家庭医学科室多样性、公平性和包容性活动的变化。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Family Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI:10.22454/FamMed.2024.917355
Alexa R Lindley, Colbey Ricklefs, Amanda Kost, Davis G Patterson, David V Evans, Daytheon Sturges, Ian M Bennett, Jeanne Cawse-Lucas
{"title":"家庭医学科室多样性、公平性和包容性活动的变化。","authors":"Alexa R Lindley, Colbey Ricklefs, Amanda Kost, Davis G Patterson, David V Evans, Daytheon Sturges, Ian M Bennett, Jeanne Cawse-Lucas","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2024.917355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Institutional racism causes worse health outcomes for patients of racial/ethnic minority groups via limited access to health care, disparities in quality of care delivered, and lack of physician diversity. Increased attention to racism in 2020 led many medical institutions to examine their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts. In the context of increased national attention to health equity, this study sought to investigate the current status of DEI infrastructure by evaluating leadership and support related to DEI in family medicine departments in 2020 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed department and chair characteristics as well as departmental DEI infrastructure (ie, leadership and actions) from Association of Departments of Family Medicine survey data in 2020 (data collected from June to September 2020) and 2021 (data collected from September to December 2021). We performed multiple regression analyses to evaluate whether department characteristics or specific DEI activities were associated with increased DEI infrastructure in 2021 compared to 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 165 department chairs sent the survey in both 2020 and 2021, 56 (33.9%) responded both years. Departments with a designated DEI leader increased from 42.9% in 2020 to 60.7% in 2021, but about 40% of departments lacked key supports for this position (ie, funding, staff support, and a pathway for advancement). Regression analysis did not demonstrate associations between independent variables and three measures of departmental DEI activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that designated leadership for DEI work increased in family medicine departments between 2020 and 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"20-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Activities of Family Medicine Departments.\",\"authors\":\"Alexa R Lindley, Colbey Ricklefs, Amanda Kost, Davis G Patterson, David V Evans, Daytheon Sturges, Ian M Bennett, Jeanne Cawse-Lucas\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/FamMed.2024.917355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Institutional racism causes worse health outcomes for patients of racial/ethnic minority groups via limited access to health care, disparities in quality of care delivered, and lack of physician diversity. Increased attention to racism in 2020 led many medical institutions to examine their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts. In the context of increased national attention to health equity, this study sought to investigate the current status of DEI infrastructure by evaluating leadership and support related to DEI in family medicine departments in 2020 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed department and chair characteristics as well as departmental DEI infrastructure (ie, leadership and actions) from Association of Departments of Family Medicine survey data in 2020 (data collected from June to September 2020) and 2021 (data collected from September to December 2021). We performed multiple regression analyses to evaluate whether department characteristics or specific DEI activities were associated with increased DEI infrastructure in 2021 compared to 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 165 department chairs sent the survey in both 2020 and 2021, 56 (33.9%) responded both years. Departments with a designated DEI leader increased from 42.9% in 2020 to 60.7% in 2021, but about 40% of departments lacked key supports for this position (ie, funding, staff support, and a pathway for advancement). Regression analysis did not demonstrate associations between independent variables and three measures of departmental DEI activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that designated leadership for DEI work increased in family medicine departments between 2020 and 2021.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"20-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745523/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2024.917355\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2024.917355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:制度性种族主义通过限制获得医疗保健的机会、提供的医疗质量的差异和医生多样性的缺乏,导致种族/少数民族患者的健康结果更差。2020年,对种族主义的日益关注导致许多医疗机构审查其多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)工作。在国家对卫生公平日益关注的背景下,本研究试图通过评估家庭医学部门在2020年和2021年与DEI相关的领导和支持来调查DEI基础设施的现状。方法:从2020年(2020年6月至9月)和2021年(2021年9月至12月)美国家庭医学部门协会调查数据中,分析科室和主席特征以及科室DEI基础设施(即领导和行动)。我们进行了多元回归分析,以评估与2020年相比,2021年部门特征或特定DEI活动是否与DEI基础设施的增加有关。结果:在165位系主任中,有56位(33.9%)在2020年和2021年都进行了调查。指定DEI负责人的部门从2020年的42.9%增加到2021年的60.7%,但约40%的部门缺乏对该职位的关键支持(即资金、人员支持和晋升途径)。回归分析没有证明自变量和部门DEI活动的三个措施之间的关联。结论:本研究表明,2020年至2021年,家庭医学部门DEI工作的指定领导增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Activities of Family Medicine Departments.

Background and objectives: Institutional racism causes worse health outcomes for patients of racial/ethnic minority groups via limited access to health care, disparities in quality of care delivered, and lack of physician diversity. Increased attention to racism in 2020 led many medical institutions to examine their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts. In the context of increased national attention to health equity, this study sought to investigate the current status of DEI infrastructure by evaluating leadership and support related to DEI in family medicine departments in 2020 and 2021.

Methods: We analyzed department and chair characteristics as well as departmental DEI infrastructure (ie, leadership and actions) from Association of Departments of Family Medicine survey data in 2020 (data collected from June to September 2020) and 2021 (data collected from September to December 2021). We performed multiple regression analyses to evaluate whether department characteristics or specific DEI activities were associated with increased DEI infrastructure in 2021 compared to 2020.

Results: Of the 165 department chairs sent the survey in both 2020 and 2021, 56 (33.9%) responded both years. Departments with a designated DEI leader increased from 42.9% in 2020 to 60.7% in 2021, but about 40% of departments lacked key supports for this position (ie, funding, staff support, and a pathway for advancement). Regression analysis did not demonstrate associations between independent variables and three measures of departmental DEI activities.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that designated leadership for DEI work increased in family medicine departments between 2020 and 2021.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信