从统计学到深度学习:在精神病学研究中使用大型语言模型。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Yining Hua, Andrew Beam, Lori B. Chibnik, John Torous
{"title":"从统计学到深度学习:在精神病学研究中使用大型语言模型。","authors":"Yining Hua,&nbsp;Andrew Beam,&nbsp;Lori B. Chibnik,&nbsp;John Torous","doi":"10.1002/mpr.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Large Language Models (LLMs) hold promise in enhancing psychiatric research efficiency. However, concerns related to bias, computational demands, data privacy, and the reliability of LLM-generated content pose challenges.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Gap</h3>\n \n <p>Existing studies primarily focus on the clinical applications of LLMs, with limited exploration of their potentials in broader psychiatric research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study adopts a narrative review format to assess the utility of LLMs in psychiatric research, beyond clinical settings, focusing on their effectiveness in literature review, study design, subject selection, statistical modeling, and academic writing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implication</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides a clearer understanding of how LLMs can be effectively integrated in the psychiatric research process, offering guidance on mitigating the associated risks and maximizing their potential benefits. While LLMs hold promise for advancing psychiatric research, careful oversight, rigorous validation, and adherence to ethical standards are crucial to mitigating risks such as bias, data privacy concerns, and reliability issues, thereby ensuring their effective and responsible use in improving psychiatric research.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50310,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From statistics to deep learning: Using large language models in psychiatric research\",\"authors\":\"Yining Hua,&nbsp;Andrew Beam,&nbsp;Lori B. Chibnik,&nbsp;John Torous\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mpr.70007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Large Language Models (LLMs) hold promise in enhancing psychiatric research efficiency. However, concerns related to bias, computational demands, data privacy, and the reliability of LLM-generated content pose challenges.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Gap</h3>\\n \\n <p>Existing studies primarily focus on the clinical applications of LLMs, with limited exploration of their potentials in broader psychiatric research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study adopts a narrative review format to assess the utility of LLMs in psychiatric research, beyond clinical settings, focusing on their effectiveness in literature review, study design, subject selection, statistical modeling, and academic writing.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implication</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study provides a clearer understanding of how LLMs can be effectively integrated in the psychiatric research process, offering guidance on mitigating the associated risks and maximizing their potential benefits. While LLMs hold promise for advancing psychiatric research, careful oversight, rigorous validation, and adherence to ethical standards are crucial to mitigating risks such as bias, data privacy concerns, and reliability issues, thereby ensuring their effective and responsible use in improving psychiatric research.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707704/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mpr.70007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mpr.70007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大语言模型(LLMs)在提高精神病学研究效率方面具有前景。然而,与偏见、计算需求、数据隐私和法学硕士生成内容的可靠性相关的问题构成了挑战。GAP:现有的研究主要集中在法学硕士的临床应用上,对其在更广泛的精神病学研究中的潜力的探索有限。目的:本研究采用叙述性回顾的形式来评估法学硕士在精神病学研究中的应用,除了临床设置,重点关注他们在文献综述,研究设计,受试者选择,统计建模和学术写作方面的有效性。含义:本研究对法学硕士如何有效地融入精神病学研究过程提供了更清晰的理解,为减轻相关风险和最大化其潜在利益提供了指导。虽然法学硕士有望推进精神病学研究,但仔细的监督、严格的验证和遵守道德标准对于减轻偏见、数据隐私问题和可靠性问题等风险至关重要,从而确保法学硕士在改善精神病学研究方面的有效和负责任的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From statistics to deep learning: Using large language models in psychiatric research

Background

Large Language Models (LLMs) hold promise in enhancing psychiatric research efficiency. However, concerns related to bias, computational demands, data privacy, and the reliability of LLM-generated content pose challenges.

Gap

Existing studies primarily focus on the clinical applications of LLMs, with limited exploration of their potentials in broader psychiatric research.

Objective

This study adopts a narrative review format to assess the utility of LLMs in psychiatric research, beyond clinical settings, focusing on their effectiveness in literature review, study design, subject selection, statistical modeling, and academic writing.

Implication

This study provides a clearer understanding of how LLMs can be effectively integrated in the psychiatric research process, offering guidance on mitigating the associated risks and maximizing their potential benefits. While LLMs hold promise for advancing psychiatric research, careful oversight, rigorous validation, and adherence to ethical standards are crucial to mitigating risks such as bias, data privacy concerns, and reliability issues, thereby ensuring their effective and responsible use in improving psychiatric research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (MPR) publishes high-standard original research of a technical, methodological, experimental and clinical nature, contributing to the theory, methodology, practice and evaluation of mental and behavioural disorders. The journal targets in particular detailed methodological and design papers from major national and international multicentre studies. There is a close working relationship with the US National Institute of Mental Health, the World Health Organisation (WHO) Diagnostic Instruments Committees, as well as several other European and international organisations. MPR aims to publish rapidly articles of highest methodological quality in such areas as epidemiology, biostatistics, generics, psychopharmacology, psychology and the neurosciences. Articles informing about innovative and critical methodological, statistical and clinical issues, including nosology, can be submitted as regular papers and brief reports. Reviews are only occasionally accepted. MPR seeks to monitor, discuss, influence and improve the standards of mental health and behavioral neuroscience research by providing a platform for rapid publication of outstanding contributions. As a quarterly journal MPR is a major source of information and ideas and is an important medium for students, clinicians and researchers in psychiatry, clinical psychology, epidemiology and the allied disciplines in the mental health field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信