调强放疗治疗早期乳腺癌:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sao Paulo Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0324.R1.03072024
Samir Abdallah Hanna, Bruna Salani Mota, Fabio Ynoe de Moraes, Gustavo Nader Marta, Heloísa de Andrade Carvalho, Rachel Riera
{"title":"调强放疗治疗早期乳腺癌:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Samir Abdallah Hanna, Bruna Salani Mota, Fabio Ynoe de Moraes, Gustavo Nader Marta, Heloísa de Andrade Carvalho, Rachel Riera","doi":"10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0324.R1.03072024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation therapy (RT) is a standard treatment for non-metastatic breast cancer and is associated with acute and late toxicities. Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) may decrease toxicity and is convenient for patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of IMRT in women with early stage breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Systematic review study; Multi-institutional centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing IMRT with any \"non-IMRT\" strategies were included. Primary outcomes were local control and acute toxicity. Cochrane Handbook was use to plan and conduct the review, and PRISMA 2020 was used to report results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCT involving 2,556 women (n = 1,283 IMRT; n = 1,274 control arm) were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between trials and arms. Local relapse-free survival rates were not different (hazard-ratio [HR] 0.62; 95%confidence interval [CI] -0.38 to 1.62; P > 0.05); however, IMRT reduced the overall acute toxicity (RR 0.69, 95%CI 0.58 to 0.82; P < 0.00001) and acute moist desquamation (risk-ratio [RR] 0.71, 95%CI 0.60 to 0.82; P < 0.00001). Lymphedema and pneumonitis rates, and survival outcomes were not affected by IMRT. The 2-year telangiectasia rate was decreased with IMRT (RR 0.66, 95%CI 0.47 to 0.93; P = 0.02); however, edema, pain, pigmentation, or fibrosis remained unaffected. IMRT did not improve cosmesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IMRT improved acute toxicity and lowered telangiectasia rates, without affecting oncological and aesthetic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>This review was registered at Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD010420. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010420.</p>","PeriodicalId":49574,"journal":{"name":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","volume":"143 1","pages":"e2023324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Samir Abdallah Hanna, Bruna Salani Mota, Fabio Ynoe de Moraes, Gustavo Nader Marta, Heloísa de Andrade Carvalho, Rachel Riera\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0324.R1.03072024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation therapy (RT) is a standard treatment for non-metastatic breast cancer and is associated with acute and late toxicities. Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) may decrease toxicity and is convenient for patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of IMRT in women with early stage breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Systematic review study; Multi-institutional centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing IMRT with any \\\"non-IMRT\\\" strategies were included. Primary outcomes were local control and acute toxicity. Cochrane Handbook was use to plan and conduct the review, and PRISMA 2020 was used to report results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCT involving 2,556 women (n = 1,283 IMRT; n = 1,274 control arm) were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between trials and arms. Local relapse-free survival rates were not different (hazard-ratio [HR] 0.62; 95%confidence interval [CI] -0.38 to 1.62; P > 0.05); however, IMRT reduced the overall acute toxicity (RR 0.69, 95%CI 0.58 to 0.82; P < 0.00001) and acute moist desquamation (risk-ratio [RR] 0.71, 95%CI 0.60 to 0.82; P < 0.00001). Lymphedema and pneumonitis rates, and survival outcomes were not affected by IMRT. The 2-year telangiectasia rate was decreased with IMRT (RR 0.66, 95%CI 0.47 to 0.93; P = 0.02); however, edema, pain, pigmentation, or fibrosis remained unaffected. IMRT did not improve cosmesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IMRT improved acute toxicity and lowered telangiectasia rates, without affecting oncological and aesthetic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>This review was registered at Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD010420. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010420.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sao Paulo Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"143 1\",\"pages\":\"e2023324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655040/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sao Paulo Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0324.R1.03072024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0324.R1.03072024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:放疗(RT)是非转移性乳腺癌的标准治疗方法,与急性和晚期毒性有关。强度调节放射治疗(IMRT)可降低毒性,对患者方便。目的:评价IMRT治疗早期乳腺癌的疗效和安全性。设计与设置:系统评价研究;多机构研究中心。方法:检索7个数据库。随机对照试验(RCT)将IMRT与任何“非IMRT”策略进行比较。主要结果为局部控制和急性毒性。Cochrane Handbook用于计划和实施评价,PRISMA 2020用于报告结果。结果:5项随机对照试验涉及2,556名妇女(n = 1,283名IMRT;N = 1,274例(对照组)。试验和组间的基线特征相似。两组局部无复发生存率差异无统计学意义(危险比[HR] 0.62;95%置信区间[CI] -0.38 ~ 1.62;P < 0.05);然而,IMRT降低了总体急性毒性(RR 0.69, 95%CI 0.58 ~ 0.82;P < 0.00001)和急性湿性脱屑(风险比[RR] 0.71, 95%CI 0.60 ~ 0.82;P < 0.00001)。淋巴水肿和肺炎发生率以及生存结果不受IMRT的影响。IMRT降低了2年毛细血管扩张率(RR 0.66, 95%CI 0.47 ~ 0.93;P = 0.02);然而,水肿、疼痛、色素沉着或纤维化未受影响。IMRT并没有改善美容。结论:IMRT改善了急性毒性,降低了毛细血管扩张率,不影响肿瘤和美学结果。系统综述注册:本综述已在Cochrane系统综述数据库2013年第3期注册。艺术。否。: CD010420。https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010420。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Radiation therapy (RT) is a standard treatment for non-metastatic breast cancer and is associated with acute and late toxicities. Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) may decrease toxicity and is convenient for patients.

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of IMRT in women with early stage breast cancer.

Design and setting: Systematic review study; Multi-institutional centers.

Methods: Seven databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing IMRT with any "non-IMRT" strategies were included. Primary outcomes were local control and acute toxicity. Cochrane Handbook was use to plan and conduct the review, and PRISMA 2020 was used to report results.

Results: Five RCT involving 2,556 women (n = 1,283 IMRT; n = 1,274 control arm) were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between trials and arms. Local relapse-free survival rates were not different (hazard-ratio [HR] 0.62; 95%confidence interval [CI] -0.38 to 1.62; P > 0.05); however, IMRT reduced the overall acute toxicity (RR 0.69, 95%CI 0.58 to 0.82; P < 0.00001) and acute moist desquamation (risk-ratio [RR] 0.71, 95%CI 0.60 to 0.82; P < 0.00001). Lymphedema and pneumonitis rates, and survival outcomes were not affected by IMRT. The 2-year telangiectasia rate was decreased with IMRT (RR 0.66, 95%CI 0.47 to 0.93; P = 0.02); however, edema, pain, pigmentation, or fibrosis remained unaffected. IMRT did not improve cosmesis.

Conclusions: IMRT improved acute toxicity and lowered telangiectasia rates, without affecting oncological and aesthetic outcomes.

Systematic review registration: This review was registered at Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD010420. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010420.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sao Paulo Medical Journal
Sao Paulo Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published bimonthly by the Associação Paulista de Medicina, the journal accepts articles in the fields of clinical health science (internal medicine, gynecology and obstetrics, mental health, surgery, pediatrics and public health). Articles will be accepted in the form of original articles (clinical trials, cohort, case-control, prevalence, incidence, accuracy and cost-effectiveness studies and systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis), narrative reviews of the literature, case reports, short communications and letters to the editor. Papers with a commercial objective will not be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信