局部麻醉在青少年和成人唇裂修复或翻修术中的应用:一项系统综述。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Amer Mansour, Wassim Najjar, Jose A Garcia-Garcia, Beyhan Annan, Raj M Vyas, Usama S Hamdan
{"title":"局部麻醉在青少年和成人唇裂修复或翻修术中的应用:一项系统综述。","authors":"Amer Mansour, Wassim Najjar, Jose A Garcia-Garcia, Beyhan Annan, Raj M Vyas, Usama S Hamdan","doi":"10.1177/10556656241311069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of solely using local anesthetics for cleft lip repair and/or revision in adolescent and adult patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Clinical studies describing the use of local anesthetics in cleft lip repair procedures.</p><p><strong>Patients, participants: </strong>A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase following the PRISMA 2025 guidelines. Inclusion criteria were studies focusing exclusively on local anesthetic techniques in adolescent or adult patients undergoing cleft lip procedures. Non-English studies, studies involving patients under the age of 10, or those undergoing cleft palate or other otolaryngological procedures were excluded. Risk of bias was addressed by using a modified Downs and Black checklist.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Review of local anesthetic use alone for adult and adolescent patients undergoing cleft lip repair or revision.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>The main studied outcomes were any reported general perioperative complications, the necessity of switching to general anesthesia, patients' self-reported pain during the surgery, wound dehiscence, wound infection, and the need for postoperative narcotics for pain control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The included studies demonstrated consistent evidence supporting the sole use of local anesthesia for cleft lip repair and revision, with absence of wound dehiscence or infection. Most patients reported minimal to no pain and required no general anesthesia during the procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current literature supports the safety and efficacy of local anesthesia alone for cleft lip repair and revision procedures. This modality offers a promising approach in resource-limited countries where access to general anesthesia is often limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656241311069"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Local Anesthesia in Adolescent and Adults Undergoing Cleft Lip Repair or Revision: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Amer Mansour, Wassim Najjar, Jose A Garcia-Garcia, Beyhan Annan, Raj M Vyas, Usama S Hamdan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656241311069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of solely using local anesthetics for cleft lip repair and/or revision in adolescent and adult patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Clinical studies describing the use of local anesthetics in cleft lip repair procedures.</p><p><strong>Patients, participants: </strong>A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase following the PRISMA 2025 guidelines. Inclusion criteria were studies focusing exclusively on local anesthetic techniques in adolescent or adult patients undergoing cleft lip procedures. Non-English studies, studies involving patients under the age of 10, or those undergoing cleft palate or other otolaryngological procedures were excluded. Risk of bias was addressed by using a modified Downs and Black checklist.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Review of local anesthetic use alone for adult and adolescent patients undergoing cleft lip repair or revision.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>The main studied outcomes were any reported general perioperative complications, the necessity of switching to general anesthesia, patients' self-reported pain during the surgery, wound dehiscence, wound infection, and the need for postoperative narcotics for pain control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The included studies demonstrated consistent evidence supporting the sole use of local anesthesia for cleft lip repair and revision, with absence of wound dehiscence or infection. Most patients reported minimal to no pain and required no general anesthesia during the procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current literature supports the safety and efficacy of local anesthesia alone for cleft lip repair and revision procedures. This modality offers a promising approach in resource-limited countries where access to general anesthesia is often limited.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10556656241311069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241311069\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241311069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估单纯局部麻醉用于青少年和成人唇裂修复和/或翻修的安全性和有效性。设计:系统回顾。背景:临床研究描述局部麻醉剂在唇裂修复过程中的使用。患者、参与者:根据PRISMA 2025指南,使用PubMed、谷歌Scholar和Embase进行文献检索。纳入标准是专门针对青少年或成人唇裂手术患者局部麻醉技术的研究。非英语研究,涉及10岁以下患者的研究,或接受腭裂或其他耳鼻喉手术的研究被排除在外。通过使用修改的Downs和Black检查表来解决偏倚风险。干预措施:回顾局部麻醉单独用于成人和青少年唇裂患者进行修复或翻修。主要结局:主要研究结局为围手术期任何报告的全身并发症、转全麻的必要性、患者术中自我报告的疼痛、伤口裂开、伤口感染以及术后麻醉品控制疼痛的需要。结果:纳入的研究显示一致的证据支持局部麻醉用于唇裂修复和翻修,没有伤口裂开或感染。大多数患者报告疼痛轻微或无疼痛,在手术过程中不需要全身麻醉。结论:目前的文献支持局部麻醉单独用于唇裂修复和翻修手术的安全性和有效性。这种方式为资源有限的国家提供了一种很有希望的方法,因为这些国家获得全身麻醉的机会往往有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Local Anesthesia in Adolescent and Adults Undergoing Cleft Lip Repair or Revision: A Systematic Review.

Objective: This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of solely using local anesthetics for cleft lip repair and/or revision in adolescent and adult patients.

Design: Systematic review.

Setting: Clinical studies describing the use of local anesthetics in cleft lip repair procedures.

Patients, participants: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase following the PRISMA 2025 guidelines. Inclusion criteria were studies focusing exclusively on local anesthetic techniques in adolescent or adult patients undergoing cleft lip procedures. Non-English studies, studies involving patients under the age of 10, or those undergoing cleft palate or other otolaryngological procedures were excluded. Risk of bias was addressed by using a modified Downs and Black checklist.

Interventions: Review of local anesthetic use alone for adult and adolescent patients undergoing cleft lip repair or revision.

Main outcomes: The main studied outcomes were any reported general perioperative complications, the necessity of switching to general anesthesia, patients' self-reported pain during the surgery, wound dehiscence, wound infection, and the need for postoperative narcotics for pain control.

Results: The included studies demonstrated consistent evidence supporting the sole use of local anesthesia for cleft lip repair and revision, with absence of wound dehiscence or infection. Most patients reported minimal to no pain and required no general anesthesia during the procedures.

Conclusions: The current literature supports the safety and efficacy of local anesthesia alone for cleft lip repair and revision procedures. This modality offers a promising approach in resource-limited countries where access to general anesthesia is often limited.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信