重型肺气肿患者右上叶和中叶气道瓣联合治疗90天的疗效和安全性。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
A Susanne Dittrich, Cosimo Carlo De Pace, Judith Maria Brock, Franziska Trudzinski, Claus Peter Heussel, Ralf Eberhardt, Felix J F Herth, Konstantina Kontogianni
{"title":"重型肺气肿患者右上叶和中叶气道瓣联合治疗90天的疗效和安全性。","authors":"A Susanne Dittrich, Cosimo Carlo De Pace, Judith Maria Brock, Franziska Trudzinski, Claus Peter Heussel, Ralf Eberhardt, Felix J F Herth, Konstantina Kontogianni","doi":"10.1186/s12931-024-03069-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In COPD patients with severe right-sided emphysema, complete major and incomplete minor fissure, implantation of one-way valves in both the right upper (RUL) and middle lobes (ML) is a possible approach for endoscopic lung volume reduction. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the response to therapy and the complication rate at 90 days (90d-FU) after combined RUL-ML valve implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, monocentric study included all patients from the Thoraxklinik Heidelberg who underwent RUL-ML valve treatment between 2012 and 2023 with available follow-up data. Quantitative chest imaging, lung function, 6-minute walking distance (6-MWD), complications and indications for re-bronchoscopies until 90d-FU were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>28 patients underwent combined RUL-ML valve treatment, predominantly sequentially (92.86%, n = 26/28). Neither lung function nor 6MWD improved significantly in the overall cohort. However, in the subgroup with heterogeneous emphysema (71.4%, n = 20/28), FEV1 (Δ = 116.00 mL ± 195.77 mL, p < 0.05) and 6-MWD (Δ = 50.23 ± 69.10 m, p < 0.05) increased significantly at 90d-FU. Consistent with this, the baseline difference in emphysema volume between the RUL + ML and the right lower lobe correlated significantly with the increase in FEV1 at 90d-FU (R = 0.74, p < 0.001). Pneumothorax occurred in 5 cases in 4 patients (14.3%) following ML treatment. Severe pneumonia and/or COPD exacerbations occurred in 32.1% (9/28) of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although only studied in a small cohort, our data suggest that combined RUL and ML valve implantation appears to be a promising interventional treatment strategy in patients with severe heterogenous RUL and ML emphysema.</p>","PeriodicalId":49131,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome and safety 90 days after combined airway valve treatment of the right upper and middle lobes in patients with severe pulmonary emphysema.\",\"authors\":\"A Susanne Dittrich, Cosimo Carlo De Pace, Judith Maria Brock, Franziska Trudzinski, Claus Peter Heussel, Ralf Eberhardt, Felix J F Herth, Konstantina Kontogianni\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12931-024-03069-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In COPD patients with severe right-sided emphysema, complete major and incomplete minor fissure, implantation of one-way valves in both the right upper (RUL) and middle lobes (ML) is a possible approach for endoscopic lung volume reduction. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the response to therapy and the complication rate at 90 days (90d-FU) after combined RUL-ML valve implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, monocentric study included all patients from the Thoraxklinik Heidelberg who underwent RUL-ML valve treatment between 2012 and 2023 with available follow-up data. Quantitative chest imaging, lung function, 6-minute walking distance (6-MWD), complications and indications for re-bronchoscopies until 90d-FU were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>28 patients underwent combined RUL-ML valve treatment, predominantly sequentially (92.86%, n = 26/28). Neither lung function nor 6MWD improved significantly in the overall cohort. However, in the subgroup with heterogeneous emphysema (71.4%, n = 20/28), FEV1 (Δ = 116.00 mL ± 195.77 mL, p < 0.05) and 6-MWD (Δ = 50.23 ± 69.10 m, p < 0.05) increased significantly at 90d-FU. Consistent with this, the baseline difference in emphysema volume between the RUL + ML and the right lower lobe correlated significantly with the increase in FEV1 at 90d-FU (R = 0.74, p < 0.001). Pneumothorax occurred in 5 cases in 4 patients (14.3%) following ML treatment. Severe pneumonia and/or COPD exacerbations occurred in 32.1% (9/28) of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although only studied in a small cohort, our data suggest that combined RUL and ML valve implantation appears to be a promising interventional treatment strategy in patients with severe heterogenous RUL and ML emphysema.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706069/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-024-03069-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-024-03069-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于合并严重右侧肺气肿、完全性大裂和完全性小裂的COPD患者,在右上叶(RUL)和中叶(ML)植入单向阀是内镜下肺减容的一种可能途径。本回顾性分析的目的是评估rl - ml联合瓣膜植入术后90天(90d-FU)的治疗反应和并发症发生率。方法:这项回顾性的单中心研究纳入了2012年至2023年间接受rl - ml瓣膜治疗的所有来自海德堡Thoraxklinik的患者,并提供了随访数据。分析定量胸部影像学、肺功能、6分钟步行距离(6-MWD)、90d-FU前再次支气管镜检查的并发症及适应证。结果:28例患者行lll - ml联合瓣膜治疗,以顺序治疗为主(92.86%,n = 26/28)。在整个队列中,肺功能和6MWD都没有显著改善。然而,在异质性肺气肿亚组中(71.4%,n = 20/28), FEV1 (Δ = 116.00 mL±195.77 mL, p)。结论:虽然仅在一个小队列中进行了研究,但我们的数据表明,联合RUL和mL瓣膜植入术似乎是一种有希望的介入治疗策略,用于严重异质性RUL和mL肺气肿患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome and safety 90 days after combined airway valve treatment of the right upper and middle lobes in patients with severe pulmonary emphysema.

Background: In COPD patients with severe right-sided emphysema, complete major and incomplete minor fissure, implantation of one-way valves in both the right upper (RUL) and middle lobes (ML) is a possible approach for endoscopic lung volume reduction. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the response to therapy and the complication rate at 90 days (90d-FU) after combined RUL-ML valve implantation.

Methods: This retrospective, monocentric study included all patients from the Thoraxklinik Heidelberg who underwent RUL-ML valve treatment between 2012 and 2023 with available follow-up data. Quantitative chest imaging, lung function, 6-minute walking distance (6-MWD), complications and indications for re-bronchoscopies until 90d-FU were analysed.

Results: 28 patients underwent combined RUL-ML valve treatment, predominantly sequentially (92.86%, n = 26/28). Neither lung function nor 6MWD improved significantly in the overall cohort. However, in the subgroup with heterogeneous emphysema (71.4%, n = 20/28), FEV1 (Δ = 116.00 mL ± 195.77 mL, p < 0.05) and 6-MWD (Δ = 50.23 ± 69.10 m, p < 0.05) increased significantly at 90d-FU. Consistent with this, the baseline difference in emphysema volume between the RUL + ML and the right lower lobe correlated significantly with the increase in FEV1 at 90d-FU (R = 0.74, p < 0.001). Pneumothorax occurred in 5 cases in 4 patients (14.3%) following ML treatment. Severe pneumonia and/or COPD exacerbations occurred in 32.1% (9/28) of patients.

Conclusions: Although only studied in a small cohort, our data suggest that combined RUL and ML valve implantation appears to be a promising interventional treatment strategy in patients with severe heterogenous RUL and ML emphysema.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory Research
Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
1.70%
发文量
314
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Respiratory Research publishes high-quality clinical and basic research, review and commentary articles on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related diseases. As the leading fully open access journal in the field, Respiratory Research provides an essential resource for pulmonologists, allergists, immunologists and other physicians, researchers, healthcare workers and medical students with worldwide dissemination of articles resulting in high visibility and generating international discussion. Topics of specific interest include asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, genetics, infectious diseases, interstitial lung diseases, lung development, lung tumors, occupational and environmental factors, pulmonary circulation, pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics, respiratory immunology, respiratory physiology, and sleep-related respiratory problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信