不同结肠节段腺瘤检出率与各自切除时间的关系:一项回顾性单中心研究。

IF 1.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
JGH Open Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70095
Xujin Chen, Bingxin Xu, Bingni Wei, Lin Ji, Cheng Yang, Qiang Zhan
{"title":"不同结肠节段腺瘤检出率与各自切除时间的关系:一项回顾性单中心研究。","authors":"Xujin Chen,&nbsp;Bingxin Xu,&nbsp;Bingni Wei,&nbsp;Lin Ji,&nbsp;Cheng Yang,&nbsp;Qiang Zhan","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The 6-min withdrawal time for colonoscopy is widely considered the standard of care. However, there may not be appropriate if the 6-min is equally divided into various colon segments. Since the adenoma detection in each colon segment is not the same, there may be differences with the withdrawal time in different colon segments. Our objective was to evaluate the relationships between adenoma detection rate (ADR) and respective withdrawal time in different colon segments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Outpatients, age range 18–75 years, undertaking complete colonoscopy were enrolled in this study from November 2019 to November 2020 in the digestive endoscopy center. The entire colon was divided into four different segments: ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon and rectosigmoid colon. The respective withdrawal time and ADR in each colon segment were recorded respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 586 outpatients (279 males, 307 females) enrolled in this study and the general ADR was 38.2%. The positive withdrawal time (adenomas detected) was longer than negative withdrawal time (non-adenomas detected) (334.04 ± 24.21 s vs. 303.65 ± 5.20 s, t = 1.26, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). ADR in ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon and rectosigmoid colon were respectively 30.5%, 2.9%, 3.1% and 7.5%. While all of their positive withdrawal time were longer than negative withdrawal time (94.34 ± 33.76 s vs. 70.40 ± 41.84 s, <i>t</i> = 3.31, <i>p</i> = 0.001; 85.40 ± 49.76 s vs. 71.66 ± 36.87 s, <i>t</i> = 1.95, <i>p</i> = 0.025; 80.29 ± 39.85 s vs. 69.73 ± 35.96 s, <i>t</i> = 1.40, <i>p</i> = 0.016;100.95 ± 55.92 s vs. 80.96 ± 42.87 s, <i>t</i> = 3.61; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively). The withdrawal time threshold in the ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, rectosigmoid colon determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 77, 61, 56 and 109 s, respectively. In the ascending colon, ADR was significantly higher (47.0% vs. 33.1%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) when the colonoscopy withdrawal time was ≥ 77 s. When the withdrawal time was ≥ 61 s in the transverse colon (42.7% vs. 32.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.013), ≥ 59 s in the descending colon (42.3% vs. 29.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and ≥ 109 s in rectosigmoid colon (52.2% vs. 33.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), ADR was also significantly higher. After adjusting for age, sex and BMI, Logistic regression analysis showed that withdrawal time ≥ 77 s in the ascending colon (OR, 1.796; 95% CI, 1.273–2.532; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), ≥ 61 s in the transverse colon (OR, 1.535; 95% CI, 1.094–2.155; <i>p</i> = 0.013), ≥ 56 s in the descending colon (OR, 1.722; 95% CI, 1.193–2.486; <i>p</i> = 0.004) and ≥ 109 s in the rectosigmoid colon (OR, 2.134; 95% CI, 1.446–2.350; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) were independent risk factors for the increase of ADR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>ADR and withdrawal time are all various in individual colon segments. During the operation of colonoscopy, withdrawal time in the ascending colon may be shortened appropriately. The adenomas in the rectosigmoid colon are more likely to be detected and do not take longer withdrawal times. We need to choose the appropriate time according to different colon segments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship Between Adenoma Detection Rate and Respective Withdrawal Time in Different Colon Segments: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study\",\"authors\":\"Xujin Chen,&nbsp;Bingxin Xu,&nbsp;Bingni Wei,&nbsp;Lin Ji,&nbsp;Cheng Yang,&nbsp;Qiang Zhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgh3.70095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>The 6-min withdrawal time for colonoscopy is widely considered the standard of care. However, there may not be appropriate if the 6-min is equally divided into various colon segments. Since the adenoma detection in each colon segment is not the same, there may be differences with the withdrawal time in different colon segments. Our objective was to evaluate the relationships between adenoma detection rate (ADR) and respective withdrawal time in different colon segments.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Outpatients, age range 18–75 years, undertaking complete colonoscopy were enrolled in this study from November 2019 to November 2020 in the digestive endoscopy center. The entire colon was divided into four different segments: ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon and rectosigmoid colon. The respective withdrawal time and ADR in each colon segment were recorded respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 586 outpatients (279 males, 307 females) enrolled in this study and the general ADR was 38.2%. The positive withdrawal time (adenomas detected) was longer than negative withdrawal time (non-adenomas detected) (334.04 ± 24.21 s vs. 303.65 ± 5.20 s, t = 1.26, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). ADR in ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon and rectosigmoid colon were respectively 30.5%, 2.9%, 3.1% and 7.5%. While all of their positive withdrawal time were longer than negative withdrawal time (94.34 ± 33.76 s vs. 70.40 ± 41.84 s, <i>t</i> = 3.31, <i>p</i> = 0.001; 85.40 ± 49.76 s vs. 71.66 ± 36.87 s, <i>t</i> = 1.95, <i>p</i> = 0.025; 80.29 ± 39.85 s vs. 69.73 ± 35.96 s, <i>t</i> = 1.40, <i>p</i> = 0.016;100.95 ± 55.92 s vs. 80.96 ± 42.87 s, <i>t</i> = 3.61; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively). The withdrawal time threshold in the ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, rectosigmoid colon determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 77, 61, 56 and 109 s, respectively. In the ascending colon, ADR was significantly higher (47.0% vs. 33.1%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) when the colonoscopy withdrawal time was ≥ 77 s. When the withdrawal time was ≥ 61 s in the transverse colon (42.7% vs. 32.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.013), ≥ 59 s in the descending colon (42.3% vs. 29.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and ≥ 109 s in rectosigmoid colon (52.2% vs. 33.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), ADR was also significantly higher. After adjusting for age, sex and BMI, Logistic regression analysis showed that withdrawal time ≥ 77 s in the ascending colon (OR, 1.796; 95% CI, 1.273–2.532; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), ≥ 61 s in the transverse colon (OR, 1.535; 95% CI, 1.094–2.155; <i>p</i> = 0.013), ≥ 56 s in the descending colon (OR, 1.722; 95% CI, 1.193–2.486; <i>p</i> = 0.004) and ≥ 109 s in the rectosigmoid colon (OR, 2.134; 95% CI, 1.446–2.350; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) were independent risk factors for the increase of ADR.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>ADR and withdrawal time are all various in individual colon segments. During the operation of colonoscopy, withdrawal time in the ascending colon may be shortened appropriately. The adenomas in the rectosigmoid colon are more likely to be detected and do not take longer withdrawal times. We need to choose the appropriate time according to different colon segments.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JGH Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708806/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JGH Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:结肠镜检查的6分钟停药时间被广泛认为是标准的护理。然而,如果将6分钟平均划分为各个结肠段,则可能不合适。由于每个结肠段的腺瘤检测不相同,不同结肠段的切除时间可能存在差异。我们的目的是评估不同结肠段的腺瘤检出率(ADR)与各自的停药时间之间的关系。方法:于2019年11月至2020年11月在消化内镜中心接受完整结肠镜检查的门诊患者,年龄18-75岁。整个结肠分为四个不同的节段:升结肠、横结肠、降结肠和直肠乙状结肠。分别记录各结肠段停药时间及不良反应。结果:共纳入586例门诊患者(男性279例,女性307例),总体不良反应发生率为38.2%。阳性停药时间(检出腺瘤)长于阴性停药时间(未检出腺瘤)(334.04±24.21 s∶303.65±5.20 s, t = 1.26, p t = 3.31, p = 0.001;85.40±49.76和71.66±36.87年代,t = 1.95, p = 0.025;80.29±39.85和69.73±35.96年代,t = 1.40, p = 0.016; 100.95±55.92和80.96±42.87年代,t = 3.61;p p p = 0.013),降结肠≥59 s (42.3% vs. 29.9%, p = 0.004),直肠乙状结肠≥109 s (52.2% vs. 33.9%, p p p = 0.013),降结肠≥56 s (OR, 1.722;95% ci, 1.193-2.486;p = 0.004),直肠乙状结肠≥109 s (OR, 2.134;95% ci, 1.446-2.350;p结论:不同结肠段的不良反应及停药时间存在差异。结肠镜手术时,可适当缩短升结肠停药时间。直肠乙状结肠的腺瘤更容易被发现,并且不需要更长的停药时间。我们需要根据不同的结肠段选择合适的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Relationship Between Adenoma Detection Rate and Respective Withdrawal Time in Different Colon Segments: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study

Relationship Between Adenoma Detection Rate and Respective Withdrawal Time in Different Colon Segments: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study

Background and Aims

The 6-min withdrawal time for colonoscopy is widely considered the standard of care. However, there may not be appropriate if the 6-min is equally divided into various colon segments. Since the adenoma detection in each colon segment is not the same, there may be differences with the withdrawal time in different colon segments. Our objective was to evaluate the relationships between adenoma detection rate (ADR) and respective withdrawal time in different colon segments.

Methods

Outpatients, age range 18–75 years, undertaking complete colonoscopy were enrolled in this study from November 2019 to November 2020 in the digestive endoscopy center. The entire colon was divided into four different segments: ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon and rectosigmoid colon. The respective withdrawal time and ADR in each colon segment were recorded respectively.

Results

A total of 586 outpatients (279 males, 307 females) enrolled in this study and the general ADR was 38.2%. The positive withdrawal time (adenomas detected) was longer than negative withdrawal time (non-adenomas detected) (334.04 ± 24.21 s vs. 303.65 ± 5.20 s, t = 1.26, p < 0.001). ADR in ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon and rectosigmoid colon were respectively 30.5%, 2.9%, 3.1% and 7.5%. While all of their positive withdrawal time were longer than negative withdrawal time (94.34 ± 33.76 s vs. 70.40 ± 41.84 s, t = 3.31, p = 0.001; 85.40 ± 49.76 s vs. 71.66 ± 36.87 s, t = 1.95, p = 0.025; 80.29 ± 39.85 s vs. 69.73 ± 35.96 s, t = 1.40, p = 0.016;100.95 ± 55.92 s vs. 80.96 ± 42.87 s, t = 3.61; p < 0.001, respectively). The withdrawal time threshold in the ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, rectosigmoid colon determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 77, 61, 56 and 109 s, respectively. In the ascending colon, ADR was significantly higher (47.0% vs. 33.1%, p < 0.001) when the colonoscopy withdrawal time was ≥ 77 s. When the withdrawal time was ≥ 61 s in the transverse colon (42.7% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.013), ≥ 59 s in the descending colon (42.3% vs. 29.9%, p = 0.004) and ≥ 109 s in rectosigmoid colon (52.2% vs. 33.9%, p < 0.001), ADR was also significantly higher. After adjusting for age, sex and BMI, Logistic regression analysis showed that withdrawal time ≥ 77 s in the ascending colon (OR, 1.796; 95% CI, 1.273–2.532; p < 0.001), ≥ 61 s in the transverse colon (OR, 1.535; 95% CI, 1.094–2.155; p = 0.013), ≥ 56 s in the descending colon (OR, 1.722; 95% CI, 1.193–2.486; p = 0.004) and ≥ 109 s in the rectosigmoid colon (OR, 2.134; 95% CI, 1.446–2.350; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for the increase of ADR.

Conclusions

ADR and withdrawal time are all various in individual colon segments. During the operation of colonoscopy, withdrawal time in the ascending colon may be shortened appropriately. The adenomas in the rectosigmoid colon are more likely to be detected and do not take longer withdrawal times. We need to choose the appropriate time according to different colon segments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信