两种方法:栅极法和双时间点血浆采样法估计肿瘤患者GFR及其相关性。

IF 0.4 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-18 DOI:10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_2_24
Sachin Tayal, Varun Shukla, Manikandan Venkatachalam, Ajay Kumar, Uddeshya Narayan Jha
{"title":"两种方法:栅极法和双时间点血浆采样法估计肿瘤患者GFR及其相关性。","authors":"Sachin Tayal, Varun Shukla, Manikandan Venkatachalam, Ajay Kumar, Uddeshya Narayan Jha","doi":"10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_2_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the increasing number of oncology cases and a parallel surge in chemotherapeutic drugs for treatment, the treating physicians conducts nephrotoxicity evaluation to provide a personalized dosing strategy. Of the various tests available, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) under gamma camera with help of Gates method has gained importance, being a good index of overall kidney functions. In addition to this, there has been an alternate and old method for GFR estimation: plasma sampling. We at our Institution conducted both the methods for better evaluation of GFR in cancer patient management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Comparison of Gates' camera based GFR based on kidney depth correction using Tonessen's method and CT based manual depth calculation with dual time point plasma sampling in cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective study wherein patients' database were evaluated over a period of four months after approval from our Institutional Review Board. Thirty patients were included in the study. GFR was evaluated by two methods: Gates camera based and dual time plasma sampling method. Statistical analysis was done to help evaluate a correlation coefficient between the methods (Gates' method with and without CT based manual depth correction and dual time point plasma sampling).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study showed moderate correlation between Gates' camera based GFR and dual time plasma sampling method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One need to understand the limitation of each method and see if the renal depth corrections can be done with the help of CT or lateral images of NM for near accurate GFR and in case of selecting dual plasma sampling, errors to be minimized in pipetting and sample counting. Hence, it will be better to use both the methods for coming to a conclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":45830,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"39 4","pages":"259-264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GFR Estimation and Correlation for Oncology Patients by Two Methods, Gates Method and Dual Time Point Plasma Sampling Method.\",\"authors\":\"Sachin Tayal, Varun Shukla, Manikandan Venkatachalam, Ajay Kumar, Uddeshya Narayan Jha\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_2_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the increasing number of oncology cases and a parallel surge in chemotherapeutic drugs for treatment, the treating physicians conducts nephrotoxicity evaluation to provide a personalized dosing strategy. Of the various tests available, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) under gamma camera with help of Gates method has gained importance, being a good index of overall kidney functions. In addition to this, there has been an alternate and old method for GFR estimation: plasma sampling. We at our Institution conducted both the methods for better evaluation of GFR in cancer patient management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Comparison of Gates' camera based GFR based on kidney depth correction using Tonessen's method and CT based manual depth calculation with dual time point plasma sampling in cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective study wherein patients' database were evaluated over a period of four months after approval from our Institutional Review Board. Thirty patients were included in the study. GFR was evaluated by two methods: Gates camera based and dual time plasma sampling method. Statistical analysis was done to help evaluate a correlation coefficient between the methods (Gates' method with and without CT based manual depth correction and dual time point plasma sampling).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study showed moderate correlation between Gates' camera based GFR and dual time plasma sampling method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One need to understand the limitation of each method and see if the renal depth corrections can be done with the help of CT or lateral images of NM for near accurate GFR and in case of selecting dual plasma sampling, errors to be minimized in pipetting and sample counting. Hence, it will be better to use both the methods for coming to a conclusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"259-264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708788/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_2_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_2_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着肿瘤病例数量的增加和化疗药物治疗的并行激增,治疗医生进行肾毒性评估以提供个性化的给药策略。在各种可用的检测方法中,伽马相机辅助下的肾小球滤过率(glomerular filtration rate, GFR)作为一种很好的肾功能指标,越来越受到重视。除此之外,还有另一种估算GFR的老方法:血浆采样。为了更好地评估GFR在癌症患者管理中的应用,我们在我们的研究所进行了这两种方法。目的:比较基于Tonessen方法的基于Gates相机的肾深度校正的GFR与基于CT的双时间点血浆采样的人工深度计算在癌症患者中的应用。方法:一项回顾性研究,在我们的机构审查委员会批准后,对患者数据库进行为期四个月的评估。30名患者参与了这项研究。采用两种方法评估GFR:基于盖茨相机的方法和双时间等离子体采样法。统计分析有助于评估两种方法之间的相关系数(Gates方法有或没有基于CT的人工深度校正和双时间点血浆采样)。结果:我们的研究显示基于Gates相机的GFR与双时间等离子体采样方法之间存在适度的相关性。结论:需要了解每种方法的局限性,看看是否可以在CT或NM侧位图像的帮助下进行肾脏深度校正,以获得接近准确的GFR,在选择双血浆取样的情况下,将移液和样品计数的误差降到最低。因此,最好使用这两种方法来得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GFR Estimation and Correlation for Oncology Patients by Two Methods, Gates Method and Dual Time Point Plasma Sampling Method.

Background: With the increasing number of oncology cases and a parallel surge in chemotherapeutic drugs for treatment, the treating physicians conducts nephrotoxicity evaluation to provide a personalized dosing strategy. Of the various tests available, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) under gamma camera with help of Gates method has gained importance, being a good index of overall kidney functions. In addition to this, there has been an alternate and old method for GFR estimation: plasma sampling. We at our Institution conducted both the methods for better evaluation of GFR in cancer patient management.

Aim: Comparison of Gates' camera based GFR based on kidney depth correction using Tonessen's method and CT based manual depth calculation with dual time point plasma sampling in cancer patients.

Method: A retrospective study wherein patients' database were evaluated over a period of four months after approval from our Institutional Review Board. Thirty patients were included in the study. GFR was evaluated by two methods: Gates camera based and dual time plasma sampling method. Statistical analysis was done to help evaluate a correlation coefficient between the methods (Gates' method with and without CT based manual depth correction and dual time point plasma sampling).

Results: Our study showed moderate correlation between Gates' camera based GFR and dual time plasma sampling method.

Conclusion: One need to understand the limitation of each method and see if the renal depth corrections can be done with the help of CT or lateral images of NM for near accurate GFR and in case of selecting dual plasma sampling, errors to be minimized in pipetting and sample counting. Hence, it will be better to use both the methods for coming to a conclusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信