通过了解大型学术医疗中心医生采用远程医疗的障碍和动机来改善患者体验。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735241310961
Alessandro Luna, Taylor B Sewell
{"title":"通过了解大型学术医疗中心医生采用远程医疗的障碍和动机来改善患者体验。","authors":"Alessandro Luna, Taylor B Sewell","doi":"10.1177/23743735241310961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients benefit from and appreciate the option to use telehealth with their providers. Such patient expectations have therefore led to new questions about the factors that affect providers' willingness to adopt telehealth as part of their clinical practice. We interviewed 19 physicians across four specialties with differential rates of telehealth use (Psychiatry, Anesthesiology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation [PM&R], and Ophthalmology) to discern the barriers and incentives to telehealth adoption among physicians. We then conducted a qualitative analysis of interview transcripts, following precepts of Directed Content Analysis. Conclusions drawn from matrix building and thematic analysis were verified with negative evidence searches and if-then tests. Robust investigations for outliers and rival explanations in responses were used to disconfirm findings. The results of this analysis revealed distinct barriers and incentives to telehealth adoption for the four specialties. Physicians in psychiatry and anesthesiology are refining the strengths and applications of telehealth based on the characteristic needs of their specialties. Physicians in PM&R and ophthalmology face additional barriers to acquiring physical exam data, leading them to use telehealth as a supplement to, rather than as a replacement for, core functions of patient care. The insights stemming from these barriers and incentives can be used to build thoughtful telehealth applications for physicians, allowing them to provide effective clinical care while also improving the patient experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"12 ","pages":"23743735241310961"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Patient Experience by Understanding Barriers and Incentives to Telehealth Adoption Among Physicians at a Large Academic Medical Center.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Luna, Taylor B Sewell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23743735241310961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients benefit from and appreciate the option to use telehealth with their providers. Such patient expectations have therefore led to new questions about the factors that affect providers' willingness to adopt telehealth as part of their clinical practice. We interviewed 19 physicians across four specialties with differential rates of telehealth use (Psychiatry, Anesthesiology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation [PM&R], and Ophthalmology) to discern the barriers and incentives to telehealth adoption among physicians. We then conducted a qualitative analysis of interview transcripts, following precepts of Directed Content Analysis. Conclusions drawn from matrix building and thematic analysis were verified with negative evidence searches and if-then tests. Robust investigations for outliers and rival explanations in responses were used to disconfirm findings. The results of this analysis revealed distinct barriers and incentives to telehealth adoption for the four specialties. Physicians in psychiatry and anesthesiology are refining the strengths and applications of telehealth based on the characteristic needs of their specialties. Physicians in PM&R and ophthalmology face additional barriers to acquiring physical exam data, leading them to use telehealth as a supplement to, rather than as a replacement for, core functions of patient care. The insights stemming from these barriers and incentives can be used to build thoughtful telehealth applications for physicians, allowing them to provide effective clinical care while also improving the patient experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Experience\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"23743735241310961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705322/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241310961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241310961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者受益于并赞赏与其提供者一起使用远程保健的选择。因此,患者的这种期望导致了新的问题,即影响提供者将远程保健作为其临床实践一部分的意愿的因素。我们采访了远程医疗使用率不同的四个专业(精神病学、麻醉学、物理医学和康复[PM&R]以及眼科)的19名医生,以了解医生采用远程医疗的障碍和动机。然后,我们对采访记录进行了定性分析,遵循定向内容分析的原则。通过负面证据检索和if-then检验验证了从矩阵构建和专题分析中得出的结论。对异常值和对立解释的有力调查被用来否定调查结果。这一分析的结果揭示了四个专业采用远程医疗的明显障碍和动机。精神病学和麻醉学医生正在根据其专业的特点需求改进远程医疗的优势和应用。PM&R和眼科的医生在获取体检数据方面面临额外的障碍,这导致他们使用远程医疗作为对患者护理核心功能的补充,而不是替代。从这些障碍和激励机制中获得的见解可用于为医生构建深思熟虑的远程医疗应用程序,使他们能够提供有效的临床护理,同时改善患者体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Patient Experience by Understanding Barriers and Incentives to Telehealth Adoption Among Physicians at a Large Academic Medical Center.

Patients benefit from and appreciate the option to use telehealth with their providers. Such patient expectations have therefore led to new questions about the factors that affect providers' willingness to adopt telehealth as part of their clinical practice. We interviewed 19 physicians across four specialties with differential rates of telehealth use (Psychiatry, Anesthesiology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation [PM&R], and Ophthalmology) to discern the barriers and incentives to telehealth adoption among physicians. We then conducted a qualitative analysis of interview transcripts, following precepts of Directed Content Analysis. Conclusions drawn from matrix building and thematic analysis were verified with negative evidence searches and if-then tests. Robust investigations for outliers and rival explanations in responses were used to disconfirm findings. The results of this analysis revealed distinct barriers and incentives to telehealth adoption for the four specialties. Physicians in psychiatry and anesthesiology are refining the strengths and applications of telehealth based on the characteristic needs of their specialties. Physicians in PM&R and ophthalmology face additional barriers to acquiring physical exam data, leading them to use telehealth as a supplement to, rather than as a replacement for, core functions of patient care. The insights stemming from these barriers and incentives can be used to build thoughtful telehealth applications for physicians, allowing them to provide effective clinical care while also improving the patient experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信