氧化锌丁香酚和内膜作为不同根管冲洗剂对乳牙微渗漏的比较研究。

Q3 Dentistry
Yogesh J Kale, Sagar Misal, Mahesh Dadpe, Prasanna T Dahake, Shrikant B Kendre
{"title":"氧化锌丁香酚和内膜作为不同根管冲洗剂对乳牙微渗漏的比较研究。","authors":"Yogesh J Kale, Sagar Misal, Mahesh Dadpe, Prasanna T Dahake, Shrikant B Kendre","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the apical microleakage of zinc oxide (ZOE) eugenol and Endoflas as obturating materials using different root canal irrigants in primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 80 extracted primary anterior teeth were divided randomly into four groups with different irrigants and obturating materials used. Group I [ZOE + sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)], group II [ZOE + NaOCI + ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)], group III (Endoflas FS + NaOCI), group IV (Endoflas FS + NaOCI + EDTA). Cleaning and shaping of the root canals were done using specified irrigants, followed by obturation with ZOE eugenol and Endoflas as per the respective groups. Specimens were then immersed in 2% methylene blue dye solution and stored for 24 hours. The specimens were split longitudinally into two halves and observed under a stereomicroscope. Apical microleakage was measured from the apex to the most coronal extent of dye penetration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest dye penetration was recorded for teeth filled with ZOE, group I (ZOE + NaOCl), with mean values of 1.924 ± 0.925. Endoflas group IV (Endoflas + NaOCI + EDTA) showed the lowest dye penetration with mean values of 0.901 ± 0.255. There was a statistically significant difference between the ZOE and Endoflas groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The result showed a statistically nonsignificant difference between the two Endoflas groups (<i>p</i> = 1.000). Minimum microleakage was found in group IV (Endoflas + NaOCI + EDTA).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoflas FS exhibits less apical microleakage than ZOE eugenol as an obturating material in primary teeth. Hence, Endoflas could be a potential alternative to ZOE eugenol with better sealing ability as an obturating material in primary teeth. Also, the addition of EDTA to irrigation protocol has shown a statistically nonsignificant improvement in microleakage reduction with both obturating materials.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Kale YJ, Misal S, Dadpe M, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Zinc Oxide Eugenol and Endoflas as Obturating Materials Using Different Root Canal Irrigants in Primary Teeth: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(11):1252-1257.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"17 11","pages":"1252-1257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Zinc Oxide Eugenol and Endoflas as Obturating Materials Using Different Root Canal Irrigants in Primary Teeth: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yogesh J Kale, Sagar Misal, Mahesh Dadpe, Prasanna T Dahake, Shrikant B Kendre\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the apical microleakage of zinc oxide (ZOE) eugenol and Endoflas as obturating materials using different root canal irrigants in primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 80 extracted primary anterior teeth were divided randomly into four groups with different irrigants and obturating materials used. Group I [ZOE + sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)], group II [ZOE + NaOCI + ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)], group III (Endoflas FS + NaOCI), group IV (Endoflas FS + NaOCI + EDTA). Cleaning and shaping of the root canals were done using specified irrigants, followed by obturation with ZOE eugenol and Endoflas as per the respective groups. Specimens were then immersed in 2% methylene blue dye solution and stored for 24 hours. The specimens were split longitudinally into two halves and observed under a stereomicroscope. Apical microleakage was measured from the apex to the most coronal extent of dye penetration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest dye penetration was recorded for teeth filled with ZOE, group I (ZOE + NaOCl), with mean values of 1.924 ± 0.925. Endoflas group IV (Endoflas + NaOCI + EDTA) showed the lowest dye penetration with mean values of 0.901 ± 0.255. There was a statistically significant difference between the ZOE and Endoflas groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The result showed a statistically nonsignificant difference between the two Endoflas groups (<i>p</i> = 1.000). Minimum microleakage was found in group IV (Endoflas + NaOCI + EDTA).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoflas FS exhibits less apical microleakage than ZOE eugenol as an obturating material in primary teeth. Hence, Endoflas could be a potential alternative to ZOE eugenol with better sealing ability as an obturating material in primary teeth. Also, the addition of EDTA to irrigation protocol has shown a statistically nonsignificant improvement in microleakage reduction with both obturating materials.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Kale YJ, Misal S, Dadpe M, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Zinc Oxide Eugenol and Endoflas as Obturating Materials Using Different Root Canal Irrigants in Primary Teeth: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(11):1252-1257.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 11\",\"pages\":\"1252-1257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703773/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2755\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价和比较氧化锌丁香酚和Endoflas作为不同根管冲洗剂对乳牙根尖微渗漏的影响。材料和方法:将拔除的80颗乳牙随机分为4组,分别使用不同的冲洗剂和充填材料。I组[ZOE +次氯酸钠(NaOCl)], II组[ZOE + NaOCI +乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)], III组(Endoflas FS + NaOCI), IV组(Endoflas FS + NaOCI + EDTA)。使用指定的冲洗剂进行根管清洁和成型,然后根据各自的组使用ZOE丁香酚和Endoflas进行封闭。将标本浸入2%亚甲基蓝染料溶液中保存24小时。标本纵向分成两半,在体视显微镜下观察。从染料渗透的尖端到最冠状面测量根尖微渗漏。结果:第一组(ZOE + NaOCl)的染料渗透度最高,平均值为1.924±0.925。Endoflas IV组(Endoflas + NaOCI + EDTA)染料穿透率最低,平均值为0.901±0.255。ZOE组和Endoflas组的差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。结果显示两组间差异无统计学意义(p = 1.000)。IV组(Endoflas + NaOCI + EDTA)微渗漏最小。结论:Endoflas FS作为乳牙封闭材料比ZOE丁香酚具有更少的根尖微渗漏。因此,Endoflas可能是ZOE丁香酚的潜在替代品,具有更好的密封能力作为乳牙的封闭材料。此外,将EDTA添加到灌溉方案中,两种封闭材料在减少微泄漏方面的改善在统计上都不显著。本文引用方式:Kale YJ, Misal S, Dadpe M等。氧化锌丁香酚和内膜作为不同根管冲洗剂对乳牙微渗漏的比较研究。中华临床儿科杂志;2009;17(11):1252-1257。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Zinc Oxide Eugenol and Endoflas as Obturating Materials Using Different Root Canal Irrigants in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the apical microleakage of zinc oxide (ZOE) eugenol and Endoflas as obturating materials using different root canal irrigants in primary teeth.

Materials and methods: A total of 80 extracted primary anterior teeth were divided randomly into four groups with different irrigants and obturating materials used. Group I [ZOE + sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)], group II [ZOE + NaOCI + ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)], group III (Endoflas FS + NaOCI), group IV (Endoflas FS + NaOCI + EDTA). Cleaning and shaping of the root canals were done using specified irrigants, followed by obturation with ZOE eugenol and Endoflas as per the respective groups. Specimens were then immersed in 2% methylene blue dye solution and stored for 24 hours. The specimens were split longitudinally into two halves and observed under a stereomicroscope. Apical microleakage was measured from the apex to the most coronal extent of dye penetration.

Results: The highest dye penetration was recorded for teeth filled with ZOE, group I (ZOE + NaOCl), with mean values of 1.924 ± 0.925. Endoflas group IV (Endoflas + NaOCI + EDTA) showed the lowest dye penetration with mean values of 0.901 ± 0.255. There was a statistically significant difference between the ZOE and Endoflas groups (p < 0.001). The result showed a statistically nonsignificant difference between the two Endoflas groups (p = 1.000). Minimum microleakage was found in group IV (Endoflas + NaOCI + EDTA).

Conclusion: Endoflas FS exhibits less apical microleakage than ZOE eugenol as an obturating material in primary teeth. Hence, Endoflas could be a potential alternative to ZOE eugenol with better sealing ability as an obturating material in primary teeth. Also, the addition of EDTA to irrigation protocol has shown a statistically nonsignificant improvement in microleakage reduction with both obturating materials.

How to cite this article: Kale YJ, Misal S, Dadpe M, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Zinc Oxide Eugenol and Endoflas as Obturating Materials Using Different Root Canal Irrigants in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(11):1252-1257.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信