体外冲击波治疗急性和慢性伤口——一项前瞻性、单中心临床试验,研究冲击波对伤口愈合的影响。

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Health Science Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70311
Kristina Landscheidt, Ahmed Alabdulmohsen, Markus Hübscher, Benjamin Geber, Jochen-Frederick Hernekamp, Ole Goertz
{"title":"体外冲击波治疗急性和慢性伤口——一项前瞻性、单中心临床试验,研究冲击波对伤口愈合的影响。","authors":"Kristina Landscheidt, Ahmed Alabdulmohsen, Markus Hübscher, Benjamin Geber, Jochen-Frederick Hernekamp, Ole Goertz","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of our prospective blinded clinical study was to examine a possible improvement and acceleration of epithelialization by treatment with low-energy extracorporeal shock waves on skin graft donor and recipient sites in patients with chronic wounds. In addition, several secondary parameters were investigated to evaluate the compatibility of the therapeutic method, its influence on infection occurrence and bacterial colonization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 35 patients were included in the study. Of these, 25 participants were assigned to the verum-placebo group and 10 to the sham treatment group. The study of the sham control group was done to exclude a possible \"remote effect\" of the placebo area. Depending on the group, the wound areas were treated with low-frequency shock waves, placebo, or sham. The examinations were performed immediately on Day 0 after surgical treatment and on Days 5, 7, 9, and 12 after surgery. To record long-term results, an additional evaluation of the wound situation was performed on Day 90.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Epithelialization was statistically significantly accelerated by shock wave application at both skin graft recipient sites and donor sites (0.86 vs. 0.92, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, the risk of wound infection was significantly reduced by using extracorporeal shock waves. Serious side effects were not reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A repeated application of ESWT followed by standardized wound care was shown to significantly accelerate the time to re-epithelialization at the skin graft donor and recipient site compared with re-epithelialization time in patients of the sham/placebo group.</p>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 1","pages":"e70311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracorporeal Shock Waves Therapy for the Treatment of Acute and Chronic Wounds-A Prospective, Monocentric Clinical Trial to Examine the Effect of Shock Waves on Wound Healing.\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Landscheidt, Ahmed Alabdulmohsen, Markus Hübscher, Benjamin Geber, Jochen-Frederick Hernekamp, Ole Goertz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hsr2.70311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of our prospective blinded clinical study was to examine a possible improvement and acceleration of epithelialization by treatment with low-energy extracorporeal shock waves on skin graft donor and recipient sites in patients with chronic wounds. In addition, several secondary parameters were investigated to evaluate the compatibility of the therapeutic method, its influence on infection occurrence and bacterial colonization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 35 patients were included in the study. Of these, 25 participants were assigned to the verum-placebo group and 10 to the sham treatment group. The study of the sham control group was done to exclude a possible \\\"remote effect\\\" of the placebo area. Depending on the group, the wound areas were treated with low-frequency shock waves, placebo, or sham. The examinations were performed immediately on Day 0 after surgical treatment and on Days 5, 7, 9, and 12 after surgery. To record long-term results, an additional evaluation of the wound situation was performed on Day 90.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Epithelialization was statistically significantly accelerated by shock wave application at both skin graft recipient sites and donor sites (0.86 vs. 0.92, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, the risk of wound infection was significantly reduced by using extracorporeal shock waves. Serious side effects were not reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A repeated application of ESWT followed by standardized wound care was shown to significantly accelerate the time to re-epithelialization at the skin graft donor and recipient site compared with re-epithelialization time in patients of the sham/placebo group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"e70311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711216/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本前瞻性盲法临床研究的目的是研究在慢性伤口患者中,低能量体外冲击波对皮肤移植供体和受体部位的治疗可能改善和加速上皮化。此外,研究了几个次要参数,以评估治疗方法的相容性,其对感染发生和细菌定植的影响。材料与方法:共纳入35例患者。其中,25名参与者被分配到安慰剂组,10名参与者被分配到假治疗组。对假对照组的研究是为了排除安慰剂区域可能的“远程效应”。根据组的不同,伤口部位用低频冲击波、安慰剂或假药治疗。术后第0天及术后第5、7、9、12天立即进行检查。为了记录长期结果,在第90天对伤口情况进行了额外的评估。结果:冲击波在皮肤移植受体和供体部位的应用均显著加速了皮肤移植的上皮化(0.86比0.92,p)。结论:与假/安慰剂组患者的再上皮化时间相比,重复应用ESWT并进行标准化伤口护理可显著加快皮肤移植供体和受体部位的再上皮化时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extracorporeal Shock Waves Therapy for the Treatment of Acute and Chronic Wounds-A Prospective, Monocentric Clinical Trial to Examine the Effect of Shock Waves on Wound Healing.

Introduction: The aim of our prospective blinded clinical study was to examine a possible improvement and acceleration of epithelialization by treatment with low-energy extracorporeal shock waves on skin graft donor and recipient sites in patients with chronic wounds. In addition, several secondary parameters were investigated to evaluate the compatibility of the therapeutic method, its influence on infection occurrence and bacterial colonization.

Materials and methods: A total of 35 patients were included in the study. Of these, 25 participants were assigned to the verum-placebo group and 10 to the sham treatment group. The study of the sham control group was done to exclude a possible "remote effect" of the placebo area. Depending on the group, the wound areas were treated with low-frequency shock waves, placebo, or sham. The examinations were performed immediately on Day 0 after surgical treatment and on Days 5, 7, 9, and 12 after surgery. To record long-term results, an additional evaluation of the wound situation was performed on Day 90.

Results: Epithelialization was statistically significantly accelerated by shock wave application at both skin graft recipient sites and donor sites (0.86 vs. 0.92, p < 0.05). Furthermore, the risk of wound infection was significantly reduced by using extracorporeal shock waves. Serious side effects were not reported.

Conclusion: A repeated application of ESWT followed by standardized wound care was shown to significantly accelerate the time to re-epithelialization at the skin graft donor and recipient site compared with re-epithelialization time in patients of the sham/placebo group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信