为家庭采集开发的邮寄延迟精液分析方案的验证。

Karen Racicot Ph.D. , Denny Sakkas Ph.D. , Brent C. Barrett Ph.D. , Kenneth Chiang Ph.D. , Charles Jenkins B.S.
{"title":"为家庭采集开发的邮寄延迟精液分析方案的验证。","authors":"Karen Racicot Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Denny Sakkas Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Brent C. Barrett Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Kenneth Chiang Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Charles Jenkins B.S.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To validate a mail-in delayed semen analysis service using deidentified remnant samples from a US fertility clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Double-blinded prospective validation of screening/diagnostic test.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Fertility clinic and clinical reference laboratory.</div></div><div><h3>Patient(s)</h3><div>Deidentified remnant samples from patients attending fertility clinic for fertility assessment (study A, n = 68; study B, n = 232).</div></div><div><h3>Intervention(s)</h3><div>None.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><div>Total motility, concentration, and morphology (Kruger, strict) measures were compared between split semen specimens that underwent comprehensive semen analysis at &lt;1 hour (referent) and 26 hours (experimental). The concordance between the paired measures was described using coefficient of variance and percent bias. Clinical concordance (CC) between 1- and 26-hour results for total motility, concentration, and morphology measures was also reported, using the fifth centile clinical reference ranges described in the World Health Organization manual (fifth edition).</div></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><div>In a controlled laboratory setting (study A), total motility, concentration, and morphology measures were highly consistent between the 1- and 26-hour analyses, with mean coefficients of variation (%CVs) of 9.0% for total motility, 4.0% for concentration, and 3.0% for morphology. There were also high CC rates: 94.2% for total motility; 100% for concentration; and 98.5% for morphology. In a real-world setting (study B), which included commercial shipment of specimens, the mean %CVs for total motility and concentration were 15% and 27%, respectively, which were more variable than those in study A yet still considerably less variable than that measured between laboratories using College of Anatomical Pathologist proficiency testing during the study period (motility %CV, 31%; concentration %CV, 37%). These comparisons also had high CC rates for total motility (86%) and concentration (93.1%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><div>These results demonstrate the validation of a laboratory service that provides accurate, comprehensive semen analysis on specimens collected remotely and shipped overnight to a clinical diagnostic laboratory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 378-384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a mail-in delayed semen analysis protocol developed for home collection\",\"authors\":\"Karen Racicot Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Denny Sakkas Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Brent C. Barrett Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Kenneth Chiang Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Charles Jenkins B.S.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xfre.2024.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To validate a mail-in delayed semen analysis service using deidentified remnant samples from a US fertility clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Double-blinded prospective validation of screening/diagnostic test.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Fertility clinic and clinical reference laboratory.</div></div><div><h3>Patient(s)</h3><div>Deidentified remnant samples from patients attending fertility clinic for fertility assessment (study A, n = 68; study B, n = 232).</div></div><div><h3>Intervention(s)</h3><div>None.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><div>Total motility, concentration, and morphology (Kruger, strict) measures were compared between split semen specimens that underwent comprehensive semen analysis at &lt;1 hour (referent) and 26 hours (experimental). The concordance between the paired measures was described using coefficient of variance and percent bias. Clinical concordance (CC) between 1- and 26-hour results for total motility, concentration, and morphology measures was also reported, using the fifth centile clinical reference ranges described in the World Health Organization manual (fifth edition).</div></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><div>In a controlled laboratory setting (study A), total motility, concentration, and morphology measures were highly consistent between the 1- and 26-hour analyses, with mean coefficients of variation (%CVs) of 9.0% for total motility, 4.0% for concentration, and 3.0% for morphology. There were also high CC rates: 94.2% for total motility; 100% for concentration; and 98.5% for morphology. In a real-world setting (study B), which included commercial shipment of specimens, the mean %CVs for total motility and concentration were 15% and 27%, respectively, which were more variable than those in study A yet still considerably less variable than that measured between laboratories using College of Anatomical Pathologist proficiency testing during the study period (motility %CV, 31%; concentration %CV, 37%). These comparisons also had high CC rates for total motility (86%) and concentration (93.1%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><div>These results demonstrate the validation of a laboratory service that provides accurate, comprehensive semen analysis on specimens collected remotely and shipped overnight to a clinical diagnostic laboratory.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FS Reports\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 378-384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705597/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FS Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334124001181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334124001181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证邮寄延迟精液分析服务,使用来自美国生育诊所的去识别残余样本。设计:筛选/诊断试验的双盲前瞻性验证。单位:生育诊所和临床参考实验室。患者:从参加生育诊所进行生育能力评估的患者中分离出残留样本(研究A, n = 68;研究B, n = 232)。干预措施:没有。主要结果测量:在进行全面精液分析的分离精液标本之间比较总运动性、浓度和形态(Kruger, strict)测量结果:在受控实验室环境中(研究a),总运动性、浓度和形态测量在1小时和26小时分析之间高度一致,总运动性的平均变异系数(% cv)为9.0%,浓度为4.0%,形态为3.0%。CC率也很高:总运动率为94.2%;浓度100%;98.5%为形态学。在真实世界的环境中(研究B),包括标本的商业运输,总运动性和浓度的平均%CV分别为15%和27%,这比研究a中的变化更大,但与研究期间使用解剖病理学学院熟练程度测试的实验室之间测量的变量相比(运动性%CV, 31%;浓度%CV, 37%)。这些比较在总运动性(86%)和浓度(93.1%)方面也有较高的CC率。结论:这些结果证明了实验室服务的有效性,该服务可以对远程采集的样本进行准确、全面的精液分析,并连夜运送到临床诊断实验室。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of a mail-in delayed semen analysis protocol developed for home collection

Objective

To validate a mail-in delayed semen analysis service using deidentified remnant samples from a US fertility clinic.

Design

Double-blinded prospective validation of screening/diagnostic test.

Setting

Fertility clinic and clinical reference laboratory.

Patient(s)

Deidentified remnant samples from patients attending fertility clinic for fertility assessment (study A, n = 68; study B, n = 232).

Intervention(s)

None.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Total motility, concentration, and morphology (Kruger, strict) measures were compared between split semen specimens that underwent comprehensive semen analysis at <1 hour (referent) and 26 hours (experimental). The concordance between the paired measures was described using coefficient of variance and percent bias. Clinical concordance (CC) between 1- and 26-hour results for total motility, concentration, and morphology measures was also reported, using the fifth centile clinical reference ranges described in the World Health Organization manual (fifth edition).

Result(s)

In a controlled laboratory setting (study A), total motility, concentration, and morphology measures were highly consistent between the 1- and 26-hour analyses, with mean coefficients of variation (%CVs) of 9.0% for total motility, 4.0% for concentration, and 3.0% for morphology. There were also high CC rates: 94.2% for total motility; 100% for concentration; and 98.5% for morphology. In a real-world setting (study B), which included commercial shipment of specimens, the mean %CVs for total motility and concentration were 15% and 27%, respectively, which were more variable than those in study A yet still considerably less variable than that measured between laboratories using College of Anatomical Pathologist proficiency testing during the study period (motility %CV, 31%; concentration %CV, 37%). These comparisons also had high CC rates for total motility (86%) and concentration (93.1%).

Conclusion(s)

These results demonstrate the validation of a laboratory service that provides accurate, comprehensive semen analysis on specimens collected remotely and shipped overnight to a clinical diagnostic laboratory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FS Reports
FS Reports Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信