中国九种常用实验动物多重RNA病毒感染流行情况

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Qiyu He, Jingyi Shu, Zhaochao Liang, Manyu Li, Shuangshuang Li, Tianxu Liu, Xinyue Yang, Qinghui Lu, Ling Wang, Lin Wang
{"title":"中国九种常用实验动物多重RNA病毒感染流行情况","authors":"Qiyu He,&nbsp;Jingyi Shu,&nbsp;Zhaochao Liang,&nbsp;Manyu Li,&nbsp;Shuangshuang Li,&nbsp;Tianxu Liu,&nbsp;Xinyue Yang,&nbsp;Qinghui Lu,&nbsp;Ling Wang,&nbsp;Lin Wang","doi":"10.1111/zph.13207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Laboratory animals are widely used in biomedical research. Surveillance of naturally occurring virus in laboratory animals is important to fully understand the results of animal experiment, control laboratory-acquired infections among research personnel and manage viral transmission within laboratory animal populations. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of multiple RNA viruses in laboratory animals commonly used in China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We screened viral RNA for five different potentially zoonotic RNA viruses (astrovirus, coronavirus, hepevirus, hepatovirus and picornavirus) that can be transmitted via the faecal-oral route in 759 faecal samples collected from nine commonly used laboratory animals (mice, rats, monkeys, rabbits, pigs, dogs, ferrets, goats and tree shrews) in China. Viral RNA was screened by broad-spectrum reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using primers annealing in genome-conserved regions. The laboratory mice and rats used in this study were specific-pathogen-free. The other laboratory animals were conventional animals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>At least one selected virus was detected in each of the nine sampled laboratory animal types, except tree shrews. The total positive rates of viral RNA for astroviruses, coronaviruses, hepeviruses and picornaviruses in the selected laboratory animals were 4.3%, 7.6%, 8.0% and 1.1%, respectively. Among these, the positivity rates for hepevirus RNA in laboratory ferrets (41.3%) and rabbits (17.8%), astrovirus RNA in laboratory pigs (75.0%) and coronavirus RNA in laboratory ferrets (45.7%) were relatively high. Viral RNA for hepatovirus was negative in all selected laboratory animals. Co-infection with multiple viruses has also been observed in laboratory dogs, pigs, ferrets and rabbits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings highlight the need for the surveillance of natural viral infections in laboratory animals.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":24025,"journal":{"name":"Zoonoses and Public Health","volume":"72 3","pages":"301-312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Multiple RNA Virus Infections in Nine Types of Commonly Used Laboratory Animals in China\",\"authors\":\"Qiyu He,&nbsp;Jingyi Shu,&nbsp;Zhaochao Liang,&nbsp;Manyu Li,&nbsp;Shuangshuang Li,&nbsp;Tianxu Liu,&nbsp;Xinyue Yang,&nbsp;Qinghui Lu,&nbsp;Ling Wang,&nbsp;Lin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/zph.13207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Laboratory animals are widely used in biomedical research. Surveillance of naturally occurring virus in laboratory animals is important to fully understand the results of animal experiment, control laboratory-acquired infections among research personnel and manage viral transmission within laboratory animal populations. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of multiple RNA viruses in laboratory animals commonly used in China.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We screened viral RNA for five different potentially zoonotic RNA viruses (astrovirus, coronavirus, hepevirus, hepatovirus and picornavirus) that can be transmitted via the faecal-oral route in 759 faecal samples collected from nine commonly used laboratory animals (mice, rats, monkeys, rabbits, pigs, dogs, ferrets, goats and tree shrews) in China. Viral RNA was screened by broad-spectrum reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using primers annealing in genome-conserved regions. The laboratory mice and rats used in this study were specific-pathogen-free. The other laboratory animals were conventional animals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>At least one selected virus was detected in each of the nine sampled laboratory animal types, except tree shrews. The total positive rates of viral RNA for astroviruses, coronaviruses, hepeviruses and picornaviruses in the selected laboratory animals were 4.3%, 7.6%, 8.0% and 1.1%, respectively. Among these, the positivity rates for hepevirus RNA in laboratory ferrets (41.3%) and rabbits (17.8%), astrovirus RNA in laboratory pigs (75.0%) and coronavirus RNA in laboratory ferrets (45.7%) were relatively high. Viral RNA for hepatovirus was negative in all selected laboratory animals. Co-infection with multiple viruses has also been observed in laboratory dogs, pigs, ferrets and rabbits.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings highlight the need for the surveillance of natural viral infections in laboratory animals.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zoonoses and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"301-312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zoonoses and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zph.13207\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoonoses and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zph.13207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实验动物广泛应用于生物医学研究。对实验室动物中自然发生的病毒进行监测对于充分了解动物实验结果、控制研究人员之间的实验室获得性感染和管理实验室动物种群内的病毒传播具有重要意义。本研究旨在调查中国常用实验动物中多种RNA病毒的流行情况。方法:从中国9种常用实验动物(小鼠、大鼠、猴子、家兔、猪、狗、雪貂、山羊和树鼩)的759份粪便样本中筛选可通过粪-口途径传播的5种潜在人畜共患RNA病毒(星状病毒、冠状病毒、肝炎病毒、肝病毒和小核糖核酸病毒)。利用广谱逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)在基因组保守区进行引物退火筛选病毒RNA。本研究使用的实验小鼠和大鼠均无特异性病原体。其他实验动物都是常规动物。结果:除树鼩外,在9种实验动物中均检测到至少一种选定病毒。在所选实验动物中,星状病毒、冠状病毒、肝炎病毒和小核糖核酸病毒的RNA总阳性率分别为4.3%、7.6%、8.0%和1.1%。其中,实验雪貂的肝炎病毒RNA(41.3%)和家兔(17.8%)、实验猪的星状病毒RNA(75.0%)和实验雪貂的冠状病毒RNA(45.7%)的阳性率较高。在所有选定的实验动物中,肝病毒RNA均为阴性。在实验犬、猪、雪貂和家兔中也观察到多种病毒的共同感染。结论:我们的发现强调了在实验动物中监测自然病毒感染的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Multiple RNA Virus Infections in Nine Types of Commonly Used Laboratory Animals in China

Introduction

Laboratory animals are widely used in biomedical research. Surveillance of naturally occurring virus in laboratory animals is important to fully understand the results of animal experiment, control laboratory-acquired infections among research personnel and manage viral transmission within laboratory animal populations. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of multiple RNA viruses in laboratory animals commonly used in China.

Methods

We screened viral RNA for five different potentially zoonotic RNA viruses (astrovirus, coronavirus, hepevirus, hepatovirus and picornavirus) that can be transmitted via the faecal-oral route in 759 faecal samples collected from nine commonly used laboratory animals (mice, rats, monkeys, rabbits, pigs, dogs, ferrets, goats and tree shrews) in China. Viral RNA was screened by broad-spectrum reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using primers annealing in genome-conserved regions. The laboratory mice and rats used in this study were specific-pathogen-free. The other laboratory animals were conventional animals.

Results

At least one selected virus was detected in each of the nine sampled laboratory animal types, except tree shrews. The total positive rates of viral RNA for astroviruses, coronaviruses, hepeviruses and picornaviruses in the selected laboratory animals were 4.3%, 7.6%, 8.0% and 1.1%, respectively. Among these, the positivity rates for hepevirus RNA in laboratory ferrets (41.3%) and rabbits (17.8%), astrovirus RNA in laboratory pigs (75.0%) and coronavirus RNA in laboratory ferrets (45.7%) were relatively high. Viral RNA for hepatovirus was negative in all selected laboratory animals. Co-infection with multiple viruses has also been observed in laboratory dogs, pigs, ferrets and rabbits.

Conclusions

Our findings highlight the need for the surveillance of natural viral infections in laboratory animals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zoonoses and Public Health
Zoonoses and Public Health 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
115
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zoonoses and Public Health brings together veterinary and human health researchers and policy-makers by providing a venue for publishing integrated and global approaches to zoonoses and public health. The Editors will consider papers that focus on timely collaborative and multi-disciplinary research in zoonoses and public health. This journal provides rapid publication of original papers, reviews, and potential discussion papers embracing this collaborative spirit. Papers should advance the scientific knowledge of the sources, transmission, prevention and control of zoonoses and be authored by scientists with expertise in areas such as microbiology, virology, parasitology and epidemiology. Articles that incorporate recent data into new methods, applications, or approaches (e.g. statistical modeling) which enhance public health are strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信