长期电子烟使用者对戒烟和使用戒烟热线服务的兴趣。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Matthew Carrillo, Jessica Yingst, Gail Carmen D'Souza, Sitasnu Dahal, Sophia I Allen, Jonathan Foulds
{"title":"长期电子烟使用者对戒烟和使用戒烟热线服务的兴趣。","authors":"Matthew Carrillo, Jessica Yingst, Gail Carmen D'Souza, Sitasnu Dahal, Sophia I Allen, Jonathan Foulds","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2447420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) contain fewer hazardous ingredients than traditional cigarettes, yet they still pose health hazards. This study evaluates experienced e-cig users' quitting interest and Quitline utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a 2012 (Wave 1) baseline survey, 1875 (28.9%) provided consent consented to future study contact. This study focused on a follow-up survey sent in 2022 (4). The main indicators assessed were participants' were participants awareness, willingness, and motivations to utilize Quitlines to quit e-cigs. The Penn State Electronic Cigarette Nicotine Dependence Index (PSECDI) was used to assess the level of dependence on e-cigs. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the outcomes of interest. Additionally, a thematic analysis was performed to evaluate qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 195) had a mean age of 52.4 (SD = 12.1) years, 64.6% (<i>n</i> = 126) were male, and the majority were Caucasian/White (88.2%, <i>n</i> = 172). About 42% (<i>n</i> = 82/195) of respondents had previously tried to quit e-cig use. Of these, more than half (63.4%, <i>n</i> = 52/82); had heard of Quitline; however, very few (9.8%, <i>n</i> = 8/82) were interested in utilizing Quitline services for assistance with quitting e-cigs. The themes that emerged included the impersonal nature of telephone counseling, lack of trust in external assistance, belief in participants' ability to quit without help, and skepticism about the effectiveness of Quitline interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was widespread reluctance to utilize Quitline cessation services among experienced e-cig users. To enhance engagement in cessation programs, such as Quitline, it may be helpful to consider specialized counseling and support tailored to the unique challenges among e-cig users.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interest in Quitting and Utilizing Quitline Services Among Long-Term E-Cigarette Users.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Carrillo, Jessica Yingst, Gail Carmen D'Souza, Sitasnu Dahal, Sophia I Allen, Jonathan Foulds\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10826084.2024.2447420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) contain fewer hazardous ingredients than traditional cigarettes, yet they still pose health hazards. This study evaluates experienced e-cig users' quitting interest and Quitline utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a 2012 (Wave 1) baseline survey, 1875 (28.9%) provided consent consented to future study contact. This study focused on a follow-up survey sent in 2022 (4). The main indicators assessed were participants' were participants awareness, willingness, and motivations to utilize Quitlines to quit e-cigs. The Penn State Electronic Cigarette Nicotine Dependence Index (PSECDI) was used to assess the level of dependence on e-cigs. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the outcomes of interest. Additionally, a thematic analysis was performed to evaluate qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 195) had a mean age of 52.4 (SD = 12.1) years, 64.6% (<i>n</i> = 126) were male, and the majority were Caucasian/White (88.2%, <i>n</i> = 172). About 42% (<i>n</i> = 82/195) of respondents had previously tried to quit e-cig use. Of these, more than half (63.4%, <i>n</i> = 52/82); had heard of Quitline; however, very few (9.8%, <i>n</i> = 8/82) were interested in utilizing Quitline services for assistance with quitting e-cigs. The themes that emerged included the impersonal nature of telephone counseling, lack of trust in external assistance, belief in participants' ability to quit without help, and skepticism about the effectiveness of Quitline interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was widespread reluctance to utilize Quitline cessation services among experienced e-cig users. To enhance engagement in cessation programs, such as Quitline, it may be helpful to consider specialized counseling and support tailored to the unique challenges among e-cig users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2447420\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2447420","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:电子烟(e-cigs)比传统香烟含有更少的有害成分,但它们仍然对健康造成危害。本研究评估有经验的电子烟使用者的戒烟兴趣及戒烟热线使用率。方法:在2012年(第一波)基线调查中,1875人(28.9%)同意未来的研究联系。这项研究的重点是在2022年进行的一项后续调查(4)。评估的主要指标是参与者利用戒烟热线戒烟的意识、意愿和动机。宾夕法尼亚州立大学电子烟尼古丁依赖指数(PSECDI)用于评估对电子烟的依赖程度。描述性统计用于检验感兴趣的结果。此外,还进行了专题分析以评估定性数据。结果:参与者(n = 195)平均年龄为52.4岁(SD = 12.1),男性占64.6% (n = 126),多数为高加索/白人(88.2%,n = 172)。约42% (n = 82/195)的受访者曾尝试戒掉电子烟。其中,超过一半(63.4%,n = 52/82);听说过Quitline;然而,很少有人(9.8%,n = 8/82)有兴趣利用戒烟热线服务帮助戒烟。出现的主题包括电话咨询的非人情性,对外部援助缺乏信任,相信参与者有能力在没有帮助的情况下戒烟,以及对戒烟热线干预措施有效性的怀疑。结论:有经验的电子烟使用者普遍不愿使用戒烟服务。为了提高戒烟计划的参与度,比如戒烟热线,考虑针对电子烟使用者的独特挑战量身定制的专业咨询和支持可能会有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interest in Quitting and Utilizing Quitline Services Among Long-Term E-Cigarette Users.

Background: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) contain fewer hazardous ingredients than traditional cigarettes, yet they still pose health hazards. This study evaluates experienced e-cig users' quitting interest and Quitline utilization.

Methods: In a 2012 (Wave 1) baseline survey, 1875 (28.9%) provided consent consented to future study contact. This study focused on a follow-up survey sent in 2022 (4). The main indicators assessed were participants' were participants awareness, willingness, and motivations to utilize Quitlines to quit e-cigs. The Penn State Electronic Cigarette Nicotine Dependence Index (PSECDI) was used to assess the level of dependence on e-cigs. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the outcomes of interest. Additionally, a thematic analysis was performed to evaluate qualitative data.

Results: Participants (n = 195) had a mean age of 52.4 (SD = 12.1) years, 64.6% (n = 126) were male, and the majority were Caucasian/White (88.2%, n = 172). About 42% (n = 82/195) of respondents had previously tried to quit e-cig use. Of these, more than half (63.4%, n = 52/82); had heard of Quitline; however, very few (9.8%, n = 8/82) were interested in utilizing Quitline services for assistance with quitting e-cigs. The themes that emerged included the impersonal nature of telephone counseling, lack of trust in external assistance, belief in participants' ability to quit without help, and skepticism about the effectiveness of Quitline interventions.

Conclusion: There was widespread reluctance to utilize Quitline cessation services among experienced e-cig users. To enhance engagement in cessation programs, such as Quitline, it may be helpful to consider specialized counseling and support tailored to the unique challenges among e-cig users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信