预筛选献血者资格以避免在献血中心延迟:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1111/trf.18107
Carley N Gemelli, Surendra Karki, Perfecto Diaz, Andrew Scott, Tanya E Davison
{"title":"预筛选献血者资格以避免在献血中心延迟:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Carley N Gemelli, Surendra Karki, Perfecto Diaz, Andrew Scott, Tanya E Davison","doi":"10.1111/trf.18107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The application of a temporary deferral when attempting to donate has a negative impact on retention. Little has been done to reduce the likelihood of a donor attending to donate, only to be found to be ineligible. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of pre-screening donors when making an appointment, to prevent in-center deferrals.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Donation attempts were collated between July and December 2020. Two segments were identified: (1) those who had a deferral applied and (2) those who successfully donated. Donor and donation characteristics examined included age, sex, prior donation history, deferral history, and appointment booking channel (pre-screened vs. not pre-screened). We also explored the impact of pre-screening on the subsequent donation behavior of those who were deferred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 3.2% of donation attempts resulted in a deferral being applied. Most donors booked an appointment via a pre-screening channel (69.9%), with the mobile app being the most popular (31.9%). Donors who booked via a pre-screening channel had lower odds of receiving a deferral (aOR: 0.86). Strongest effects were observed for new donors (aOR: 0.79), those aged ≤40 years. (aOR: 0.84) and those deferred in the past (aOR: 0.87). Deferred donors who booked by a pre-screening channel were more likely to return at 6 months (aHR: 1.09) and 12 months (aHR: 1.12) compared to those who did not book through a pre-screening channel.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Pre-screening donors is a simple and effective approach to reduce the number of donors deferred when presenting to donate in the donation center, with a longer-term impact on donor retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-screening donor eligibility to avoid a deferral in the blood donation center: A retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Carley N Gemelli, Surendra Karki, Perfecto Diaz, Andrew Scott, Tanya E Davison\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/trf.18107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The application of a temporary deferral when attempting to donate has a negative impact on retention. Little has been done to reduce the likelihood of a donor attending to donate, only to be found to be ineligible. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of pre-screening donors when making an appointment, to prevent in-center deferrals.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Donation attempts were collated between July and December 2020. Two segments were identified: (1) those who had a deferral applied and (2) those who successfully donated. Donor and donation characteristics examined included age, sex, prior donation history, deferral history, and appointment booking channel (pre-screened vs. not pre-screened). We also explored the impact of pre-screening on the subsequent donation behavior of those who were deferred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 3.2% of donation attempts resulted in a deferral being applied. Most donors booked an appointment via a pre-screening channel (69.9%), with the mobile app being the most popular (31.9%). Donors who booked via a pre-screening channel had lower odds of receiving a deferral (aOR: 0.86). Strongest effects were observed for new donors (aOR: 0.79), those aged ≤40 years. (aOR: 0.84) and those deferred in the past (aOR: 0.87). Deferred donors who booked by a pre-screening channel were more likely to return at 6 months (aHR: 1.09) and 12 months (aHR: 1.12) compared to those who did not book through a pre-screening channel.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Pre-screening donors is a simple and effective approach to reduce the number of donors deferred when presenting to donate in the donation center, with a longer-term impact on donor retention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18107\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在尝试捐赠时应用临时延期对留存率有负面影响。几乎没有采取任何措施来减少捐赠者出席捐赠的可能性,结果却被发现不符合条件。本研究的目的是确定预约时预先筛选捐赠者的有效性,以防止中心延误。研究设计和方法:对2020年7月至12月期间的捐赠尝试进行整理。确定了两个部分:(1)申请延期的人;(2)成功捐赠的人。供者和捐赠特征包括年龄、性别、既往捐赠史、延期历史和预约渠道(预筛选与未预筛选)。我们还探讨了预筛选对那些被推迟的人随后的捐赠行为的影响。结果:总体而言,3.2%的捐赠尝试导致延迟申请。大多数捐赠者通过预筛选渠道预约(69.9%),其中移动应用程序最受欢迎(31.9%)。通过预筛选渠道预约的捐赠者获得延期的几率较低(aOR: 0.86)。对于年龄≤40岁的新献血者(aOR: 0.79),效果最强。(aOR: 0.84)和过去递延的(aOR: 0.87)。与没有通过预筛选渠道预订的人相比,通过预筛选渠道预订的延迟捐赠者更有可能在6个月(aHR: 1.09)和12个月(aHR: 1.12)时返回。讨论:预筛选捐赠者是一种简单有效的方法,可以减少在捐赠中心提交捐赠时延迟的捐赠者数量,并对捐赠者的保留产生长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre-screening donor eligibility to avoid a deferral in the blood donation center: A retrospective cohort study.

Background: The application of a temporary deferral when attempting to donate has a negative impact on retention. Little has been done to reduce the likelihood of a donor attending to donate, only to be found to be ineligible. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of pre-screening donors when making an appointment, to prevent in-center deferrals.

Study design and methods: Donation attempts were collated between July and December 2020. Two segments were identified: (1) those who had a deferral applied and (2) those who successfully donated. Donor and donation characteristics examined included age, sex, prior donation history, deferral history, and appointment booking channel (pre-screened vs. not pre-screened). We also explored the impact of pre-screening on the subsequent donation behavior of those who were deferred.

Results: Overall, 3.2% of donation attempts resulted in a deferral being applied. Most donors booked an appointment via a pre-screening channel (69.9%), with the mobile app being the most popular (31.9%). Donors who booked via a pre-screening channel had lower odds of receiving a deferral (aOR: 0.86). Strongest effects were observed for new donors (aOR: 0.79), those aged ≤40 years. (aOR: 0.84) and those deferred in the past (aOR: 0.87). Deferred donors who booked by a pre-screening channel were more likely to return at 6 months (aHR: 1.09) and 12 months (aHR: 1.12) compared to those who did not book through a pre-screening channel.

Discussion: Pre-screening donors is a simple and effective approach to reduce the number of donors deferred when presenting to donate in the donation center, with a longer-term impact on donor retention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信