烟草零售商密度和社区步行能力与青少年在美国加利福尼亚州开始吸电子烟的前瞻性协会。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alyssa F Harlow, Laura K Thompson, Sandrah P Eckel, Adam M Leventhal, Danielle F Haley, Megan E Roberts, Myles G Cockburn, Jessica L Barrington-Trimis
{"title":"烟草零售商密度和社区步行能力与青少年在美国加利福尼亚州开始吸电子烟的前瞻性协会。","authors":"Alyssa F Harlow, Laura K Thompson, Sandrah P Eckel, Adam M Leventhal, Danielle F Haley, Megan E Roberts, Myles G Cockburn, Jessica L Barrington-Trimis","doi":"10.1136/tc-2024-058974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tobacco retailer density might influence youth e-cigarette use due to increased access and exposure to point-of-sale marketing. There is a need for longitudinal investigations on the association of tobacco retailer density with youth e-cigarette use, with consideration of contextual factors such as neighbourhood walkability that could enhance retailer exposure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five semi-annual waves (Fall 2021-Fall 2023) of a Southern California school-based cohort of youth who never vaped at baseline (n=3401; mean baseline age=15 years [range=12-17]) were merged with spatial data on tobacco retailers corresponding to each school year. Time-varying measures of retailer exposures included count of retailers within circular home buffers (800 m/1600 m buffers) and retailer density/km<sup>2</sup> within home census tracts. Discrete-time survival analyses estimated associations of time-lagged and time-varying retailer exposures with vaping initiation at each 6-month follow-up, adjusting for race/ethnicity, parental education, neighbourhood walkability and an Area Deprivation Index. Secondary analyses examined moderation by neighbourhood walkability based on a National Walkability Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incident rate of vaping initiation was 3.8% per 6-month follow-up. After covariate adjustment, only associations with census tract retail density were statistically significant (risk ratio (RR) highest vs lowest quartile=1.36, 95% CI=1.01 to 1.84). In moderation analyses, count of retailers within 800 m home buffers was positively associated with vaping initiation for youth who lived in the most walkable neighbourhoods (RR=1.08, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.16), with no association for youth in less walkable neighbourhoods (RR=1.00, 95% CI:0.95 to 1.05; interaction p-value=0.0238).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings highlight the potential role of restricting retailer density in preventing youth vaping, particularly in areas characterised by both greater walkability and tobacco retailer density.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective association of tobacco retailer density and neighbourhood walkability with youth vaping initiation in California, USA.\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa F Harlow, Laura K Thompson, Sandrah P Eckel, Adam M Leventhal, Danielle F Haley, Megan E Roberts, Myles G Cockburn, Jessica L Barrington-Trimis\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/tc-2024-058974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tobacco retailer density might influence youth e-cigarette use due to increased access and exposure to point-of-sale marketing. There is a need for longitudinal investigations on the association of tobacco retailer density with youth e-cigarette use, with consideration of contextual factors such as neighbourhood walkability that could enhance retailer exposure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five semi-annual waves (Fall 2021-Fall 2023) of a Southern California school-based cohort of youth who never vaped at baseline (n=3401; mean baseline age=15 years [range=12-17]) were merged with spatial data on tobacco retailers corresponding to each school year. Time-varying measures of retailer exposures included count of retailers within circular home buffers (800 m/1600 m buffers) and retailer density/km<sup>2</sup> within home census tracts. Discrete-time survival analyses estimated associations of time-lagged and time-varying retailer exposures with vaping initiation at each 6-month follow-up, adjusting for race/ethnicity, parental education, neighbourhood walkability and an Area Deprivation Index. Secondary analyses examined moderation by neighbourhood walkability based on a National Walkability Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incident rate of vaping initiation was 3.8% per 6-month follow-up. After covariate adjustment, only associations with census tract retail density were statistically significant (risk ratio (RR) highest vs lowest quartile=1.36, 95% CI=1.01 to 1.84). In moderation analyses, count of retailers within 800 m home buffers was positively associated with vaping initiation for youth who lived in the most walkable neighbourhoods (RR=1.08, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.16), with no association for youth in less walkable neighbourhoods (RR=1.00, 95% CI:0.95 to 1.05; interaction p-value=0.0238).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings highlight the potential role of restricting retailer density in preventing youth vaping, particularly in areas characterised by both greater walkability and tobacco retailer density.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058974\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058974","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:烟草零售商密度可能会影响青少年电子烟的使用,因为他们更容易接触到销售点营销。有必要对烟草零售商密度与青少年电子烟使用之间的关系进行纵向调查,并考虑可能增加零售商曝光率的环境因素,如社区步行性。方法:在南加州学校为基础的基线时从不吸电子烟的青年队列中,每半年进行五次(2021年秋季至2023年秋季)(n=3401;将平均基线年龄=15岁[范围=12-17])与各学年对应的烟草零售商空间数据合并。零售商暴露的时变测量包括圆形家庭缓冲区(800米/1600米缓冲区)内的零售商数量和家庭人口普查区内每平方公里的零售商密度。离散时间生存分析估计了在每6个月的随访中,时差和时变零售商暴露与电子烟开始的关联,调整了种族/民族、父母教育、社区步行性和区域剥夺指数。第二个分析是根据国家步行指数来检验社区步行的适度性。结果:随访6个月,吸电子烟的发生率为3.8%。协变量调整后,只有与人口普查区零售密度的相关性具有统计学意义(风险比(RR)最高与最低四分位数=1.36,95% CI=1.01至1.84)。在适度分析中,800米家庭缓冲区内的零售商数量与居住在最适合步行的社区的年轻人吸电子烟呈正相关(RR=1.08, 95% CI: 1.01至1.16),而与居住在最不适合步行的社区的年轻人没有关联(RR=1.00, 95% CI:0.95至1.05;交互假定值= 0.0238)。结论:研究结果强调了限制零售商密度在防止青少年吸电子烟方面的潜在作用,特别是在可步行性和烟草零售商密度都较高的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective association of tobacco retailer density and neighbourhood walkability with youth vaping initiation in California, USA.

Background: Tobacco retailer density might influence youth e-cigarette use due to increased access and exposure to point-of-sale marketing. There is a need for longitudinal investigations on the association of tobacco retailer density with youth e-cigarette use, with consideration of contextual factors such as neighbourhood walkability that could enhance retailer exposure.

Methods: Five semi-annual waves (Fall 2021-Fall 2023) of a Southern California school-based cohort of youth who never vaped at baseline (n=3401; mean baseline age=15 years [range=12-17]) were merged with spatial data on tobacco retailers corresponding to each school year. Time-varying measures of retailer exposures included count of retailers within circular home buffers (800 m/1600 m buffers) and retailer density/km2 within home census tracts. Discrete-time survival analyses estimated associations of time-lagged and time-varying retailer exposures with vaping initiation at each 6-month follow-up, adjusting for race/ethnicity, parental education, neighbourhood walkability and an Area Deprivation Index. Secondary analyses examined moderation by neighbourhood walkability based on a National Walkability Index.

Results: The incident rate of vaping initiation was 3.8% per 6-month follow-up. After covariate adjustment, only associations with census tract retail density were statistically significant (risk ratio (RR) highest vs lowest quartile=1.36, 95% CI=1.01 to 1.84). In moderation analyses, count of retailers within 800 m home buffers was positively associated with vaping initiation for youth who lived in the most walkable neighbourhoods (RR=1.08, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.16), with no association for youth in less walkable neighbourhoods (RR=1.00, 95% CI:0.95 to 1.05; interaction p-value=0.0238).

Conclusion: Findings highlight the potential role of restricting retailer density in preventing youth vaping, particularly in areas characterised by both greater walkability and tobacco retailer density.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信