评价多巴胺激动剂和氯硝西泮对不宁腿综合征大肌群运动的差异影响。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Sleep Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsae310
Maria P Mogavero, Patrizia Congiu, Giuseppe Lanza, Sara Marelli, Alessandra Castelnuovo, Monica Puligheddu, Oliviero Bruni, Luigi Ferini Strambi, Raffaele Ferri
{"title":"评价多巴胺激动剂和氯硝西泮对不宁腿综合征大肌群运动的差异影响。","authors":"Maria P Mogavero, Patrizia Congiu, Giuseppe Lanza, Sara Marelli, Alessandra Castelnuovo, Monica Puligheddu, Oliviero Bruni, Luigi Ferini Strambi, Raffaele Ferri","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsae310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effect of dopamine agonists (DA) and Clonazepam on Large Muscle Group Movements during sleep (LMM), a distinct motor phenomenon, in Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 51 drug-free adult patients with RLS, divided into three groups: 33 received a DA (pramipexole or ropinirole), 15 received clonazepam, and 18 received a placebo. Each patient underwent two consecutive nocturnal polysomnographic (PSG) recordings: one baseline and one following treatment administration. LMM and periodic leg movements during sleep (PLMS) were scored. Differences between groups were analyzed using ANCOVA, with the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group severity scale as a covariate, and within-group changes were assessed using paired t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, no significant difference in LMM or PLMS was observed between groups. Following treatment, DA significantly reduced PLMS and periodicity indexes but did not significantly alter LMM indexes, except for a small increase in LMM duration. The placebo group exhibited a significant decrease in LMM index during the second night, potentially reflecting a first-night effect (FNE). Clonazepam did not significantly affect either PLMS or LMM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DA effectively reduced PLMS but did not significantly impact LMM, suggesting that LMM may involve different neurophysiological mechanisms. The potential FNE observed in the placebo group underscores the need for careful consideration of adaptation effects in sleep studies. Future research should explore alternative or adjunctive therapies targeting LMM and residual sleep disturbances in RLS.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Differential Effects of Dopamine Agonists and Clonazepam on Large Muscle Group Movements in Restless Legs Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Maria P Mogavero, Patrizia Congiu, Giuseppe Lanza, Sara Marelli, Alessandra Castelnuovo, Monica Puligheddu, Oliviero Bruni, Luigi Ferini Strambi, Raffaele Ferri\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sleep/zsae310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effect of dopamine agonists (DA) and Clonazepam on Large Muscle Group Movements during sleep (LMM), a distinct motor phenomenon, in Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 51 drug-free adult patients with RLS, divided into three groups: 33 received a DA (pramipexole or ropinirole), 15 received clonazepam, and 18 received a placebo. Each patient underwent two consecutive nocturnal polysomnographic (PSG) recordings: one baseline and one following treatment administration. LMM and periodic leg movements during sleep (PLMS) were scored. Differences between groups were analyzed using ANCOVA, with the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group severity scale as a covariate, and within-group changes were assessed using paired t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, no significant difference in LMM or PLMS was observed between groups. Following treatment, DA significantly reduced PLMS and periodicity indexes but did not significantly alter LMM indexes, except for a small increase in LMM duration. The placebo group exhibited a significant decrease in LMM index during the second night, potentially reflecting a first-night effect (FNE). Clonazepam did not significantly affect either PLMS or LMM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DA effectively reduced PLMS but did not significantly impact LMM, suggesting that LMM may involve different neurophysiological mechanisms. The potential FNE observed in the placebo group underscores the need for careful consideration of adaptation effects in sleep studies. Future research should explore alternative or adjunctive therapies targeting LMM and residual sleep disturbances in RLS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae310\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:本研究旨在探讨多巴胺激动剂(DA)和氯硝西泮对不宁腿综合征(RLS)中一种明显的运动现象——睡眠大肌群运动(LMM)的影响。方法:回顾性分析51例无药物的成人RLS患者,分为3组:33例给予DA(普拉克索或罗匹尼罗),15例给予氯硝西泮,18例给予安慰剂。每位患者接受两次连续的夜间多导睡眠图(PSG)记录:一次为基线记录,一次为治疗后记录。对LMM和睡眠期间的周期性腿部运动(PLMS)进行评分。使用ANCOVA分析组间差异,以国际不宁腿综合征研究组严重程度量表作为协变量,并使用配对t检验评估组内变化。结果:在基线时,两组间LMM和PLMS无显著差异。治疗后,DA显著降低了PLMS和周期性指数,但除了LMM持续时间有小幅增加外,LMM指数没有显著变化。安慰剂组在第二晚表现出LMM指数的显著下降,可能反映了第一晚效应(FNE)。氯硝西泮对PLMS和LMM均无显著影响。结论:DA可有效降低PLMS,但对LMM无显著影响,提示LMM可能涉及不同的神经生理机制。在安慰剂组中观察到的潜在FNE强调了在睡眠研究中仔细考虑适应效应的必要性。未来的研究应该探索针对LMM和RLS残留睡眠障碍的替代或辅助治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Differential Effects of Dopamine Agonists and Clonazepam on Large Muscle Group Movements in Restless Legs Syndrome.

Study objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effect of dopamine agonists (DA) and Clonazepam on Large Muscle Group Movements during sleep (LMM), a distinct motor phenomenon, in Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 51 drug-free adult patients with RLS, divided into three groups: 33 received a DA (pramipexole or ropinirole), 15 received clonazepam, and 18 received a placebo. Each patient underwent two consecutive nocturnal polysomnographic (PSG) recordings: one baseline and one following treatment administration. LMM and periodic leg movements during sleep (PLMS) were scored. Differences between groups were analyzed using ANCOVA, with the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group severity scale as a covariate, and within-group changes were assessed using paired t-tests.

Results: At baseline, no significant difference in LMM or PLMS was observed between groups. Following treatment, DA significantly reduced PLMS and periodicity indexes but did not significantly alter LMM indexes, except for a small increase in LMM duration. The placebo group exhibited a significant decrease in LMM index during the second night, potentially reflecting a first-night effect (FNE). Clonazepam did not significantly affect either PLMS or LMM.

Conclusions: DA effectively reduced PLMS but did not significantly impact LMM, suggesting that LMM may involve different neurophysiological mechanisms. The potential FNE observed in the placebo group underscores the need for careful consideration of adaptation effects in sleep studies. Future research should explore alternative or adjunctive therapies targeting LMM and residual sleep disturbances in RLS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep
Sleep Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including: Genes Molecules Cells Physiology Neural systems and circuits Behavior and cognition Self-report SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to: Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信