一项揭示他汀类药物依从性可改变影响的系统综述。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-01-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S502645
Javiera Rosenberg, Smaragda Lampridou, Amelia Moores, Sara Garfield, David Wingfield, Gaby Judah
{"title":"一项揭示他汀类药物依从性可改变影响的系统综述。","authors":"Javiera Rosenberg, Smaragda Lampridou, Amelia Moores, Sara Garfield, David Wingfield, Gaby Judah","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S502645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Statins are effective in reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but adherence rates remain low globally. Understanding and addressing modifiable influences on adherence is key to improving outcomes. Existing reviews have methodological limitations, often failing to integrate qualitative and quantitative data or consider specific barriers to statin adherence. This systematic review aimed to identify modifiable barriers and facilitators to statin adherence using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). A comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL was conducted, covering studies from January 1998 to November 2023. Data were coded to TDF domains and synthesized to identify specific influences on adherence. The nature of the evidence (qualitative or quantitative) was recorded for each influence, and variations among patient groups were noted. Seventy studies from 20 countries were included, with only one focused on ethnic minorities. The most commonly identified domains affecting adherence were \"Beliefs about Consequences\", \"Knowledge\", 'Environmental Context and Resources', and \"Social Influences\". Key factors included knowledge of disease, perceived disease threat, perceived benefits of statins, and patient-provider communication and trust. While side effects had inconsistent associations with adherence, forgetfulness was mainly addressed in quantitative studies, and social influences were highlighted in qualitative research. This review identified modifiable factors that could improve statin adherence. Future research should focus on addressing barriers faced by underrepresented groups to create more inclusive and effective interventions that enhance patient support and communication for better health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"29-48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review Uncovering Modifiable Influences on Statin Adherence.\",\"authors\":\"Javiera Rosenberg, Smaragda Lampridou, Amelia Moores, Sara Garfield, David Wingfield, Gaby Judah\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S502645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Statins are effective in reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but adherence rates remain low globally. Understanding and addressing modifiable influences on adherence is key to improving outcomes. Existing reviews have methodological limitations, often failing to integrate qualitative and quantitative data or consider specific barriers to statin adherence. This systematic review aimed to identify modifiable barriers and facilitators to statin adherence using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). A comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL was conducted, covering studies from January 1998 to November 2023. Data were coded to TDF domains and synthesized to identify specific influences on adherence. The nature of the evidence (qualitative or quantitative) was recorded for each influence, and variations among patient groups were noted. Seventy studies from 20 countries were included, with only one focused on ethnic minorities. The most commonly identified domains affecting adherence were \\\"Beliefs about Consequences\\\", \\\"Knowledge\\\", 'Environmental Context and Resources', and \\\"Social Influences\\\". Key factors included knowledge of disease, perceived disease threat, perceived benefits of statins, and patient-provider communication and trust. While side effects had inconsistent associations with adherence, forgetfulness was mainly addressed in quantitative studies, and social influences were highlighted in qualitative research. This review identified modifiable factors that could improve statin adherence. Future research should focus on addressing barriers faced by underrepresented groups to create more inclusive and effective interventions that enhance patient support and communication for better health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"29-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708203/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S502645\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S502645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

他汀类药物在降低心血管疾病(CVD)风险方面有效,但全球依从率仍然很低。了解和处理对依从性的可改变影响是改善结果的关键。现有的综述在方法上存在局限性,常常不能整合定性和定量数据,或考虑他汀类药物依从性的具体障碍。本系统综述旨在使用理论领域框架(TDF)确定可改变的他汀类药物依从性障碍和促进因素。对Embase、MEDLINE、PsycINFO和CINAHL进行了综合检索,涵盖了1998年1月至2023年11月的研究。将数据编码到TDF结构域并进行合成以确定对粘附性的具体影响。记录每种影响的证据性质(定性或定量),并注意到患者群体之间的差异。其中包括来自20个国家的70项研究,其中只有一项是针对少数民族的。最常见的影响依从性的领域是“关于结果的信念”、“知识”、“环境背景和资源”和“社会影响”。关键因素包括疾病知识、感知到的疾病威胁、感知到的他汀类药物的益处以及医患沟通和信任。虽然副作用与依从性的关联不一致,但定量研究主要关注健忘,而定性研究则强调社会影响。本综述确定了可以改善他汀类药物依从性的可改变因素。未来的研究应侧重于解决代表性不足群体面临的障碍,以创造更具包容性和有效的干预措施,加强患者的支持和沟通,以获得更好的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review Uncovering Modifiable Influences on Statin Adherence.

Statins are effective in reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but adherence rates remain low globally. Understanding and addressing modifiable influences on adherence is key to improving outcomes. Existing reviews have methodological limitations, often failing to integrate qualitative and quantitative data or consider specific barriers to statin adherence. This systematic review aimed to identify modifiable barriers and facilitators to statin adherence using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). A comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL was conducted, covering studies from January 1998 to November 2023. Data were coded to TDF domains and synthesized to identify specific influences on adherence. The nature of the evidence (qualitative or quantitative) was recorded for each influence, and variations among patient groups were noted. Seventy studies from 20 countries were included, with only one focused on ethnic minorities. The most commonly identified domains affecting adherence were "Beliefs about Consequences", "Knowledge", 'Environmental Context and Resources', and "Social Influences". Key factors included knowledge of disease, perceived disease threat, perceived benefits of statins, and patient-provider communication and trust. While side effects had inconsistent associations with adherence, forgetfulness was mainly addressed in quantitative studies, and social influences were highlighted in qualitative research. This review identified modifiable factors that could improve statin adherence. Future research should focus on addressing barriers faced by underrepresented groups to create more inclusive and effective interventions that enhance patient support and communication for better health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信