颞下颌障碍的简化颌功能限制量表:心理测量评估。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Oral diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1111/odi.15253
Ruonan Sun, Tiqian Liu, Yiwei Liu, Shuyuan Zhang, Yuan Yue, Nan Jiang, Liming Zhang, Xin Xiong
{"title":"颞下颌障碍的简化颌功能限制量表:心理测量评估。","authors":"Ruonan Sun, Tiqian Liu, Yiwei Liu, Shuyuan Zhang, Yuan Yue, Nan Jiang, Liming Zhang, Xin Xiong","doi":"10.1111/odi.15253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to simplify the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS) and evaluate its reliability and validity in assessing jaw function in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TMD patients and non-TMD participants were assessed using Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Demographic data and the 8-item JFLS questionnaire were collected to quantify jaw functional restriction. Confirmatory factor analysis tested the validity of JFLS-8 using chi-square, comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and root mean square residual (RMR). The study selected key items from each domain to create a 4-item JFLS for further testing. Exploratory factor analysis, reliability, and validity tests were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis included 671 valid questionnaires (502 TMD patients, 169 non-TMD participants). JFLS-8 exhibited satisfactory fit among TMD patients (RMSEA = 0.143, CFI = 0.881, RMR = 0.567). JFLS-4 retained items with high factor loadings: JFLS1 (0.935), JFLS2 (0.923), JFLS7 (0.766), and JFLS5 (0.713). The simplified JFLS-4 showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.714) and validity (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 0.558, Bartlett's test < 0.001) among TMD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 4-item JFLS was developed and validated, demonstrating good reliability and validity in assessing mandibular function in TMD patients, exhibiting the potential to streamline evaluation processes in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19615,"journal":{"name":"Oral diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplified Jaw Functional Limitation Scale for Temporomandibular Disorders: Psychometric Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Ruonan Sun, Tiqian Liu, Yiwei Liu, Shuyuan Zhang, Yuan Yue, Nan Jiang, Liming Zhang, Xin Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/odi.15253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to simplify the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS) and evaluate its reliability and validity in assessing jaw function in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TMD patients and non-TMD participants were assessed using Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Demographic data and the 8-item JFLS questionnaire were collected to quantify jaw functional restriction. Confirmatory factor analysis tested the validity of JFLS-8 using chi-square, comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and root mean square residual (RMR). The study selected key items from each domain to create a 4-item JFLS for further testing. Exploratory factor analysis, reliability, and validity tests were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis included 671 valid questionnaires (502 TMD patients, 169 non-TMD participants). JFLS-8 exhibited satisfactory fit among TMD patients (RMSEA = 0.143, CFI = 0.881, RMR = 0.567). JFLS-4 retained items with high factor loadings: JFLS1 (0.935), JFLS2 (0.923), JFLS7 (0.766), and JFLS5 (0.713). The simplified JFLS-4 showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.714) and validity (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 0.558, Bartlett's test < 0.001) among TMD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 4-item JFLS was developed and validated, demonstrating good reliability and validity in assessing mandibular function in TMD patients, exhibiting the potential to streamline evaluation processes in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.15253\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.15253","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:简化颌骨功能限制量表(JFLS),并评价其在初级保健中评估颞下颌疾病(TMD)患者颌骨功能的信度和效度。方法:采用颞下颌疾病诊断标准(DC/TMD)对TMD患者和非TMD参与者进行评估。收集人口统计数据和8项JFLS问卷来量化颌骨功能限制。验证性因子分析采用卡方、比较拟合指数(CFI)、近似均方根误差(RMSEA)和均方根残差(RMR)检验JFLS-8的效度。本研究从每个领域中选择关键项目创建一个包含4个项目的JFLS,以供进一步测试。进行探索性因素分析、信度和效度检验。结果:共收集有效问卷671份(TMD患者502份,非TMD参与者169份)。JFLS-8在TMD患者中的拟合度较好(RMSEA = 0.143, CFI = 0.881, RMR = 0.567)。JFLS-4保留了因子负荷较高的条目:JFLS1(0.935)、JFLS2(0.923)、JFLS7(0.766)和JFLS5(0.713)。简化后的JFLS-4具有良好的信度(Cronbach’s alpha 0.714)和效度(Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 0.558, Bartlett’s检验)。结论:开发并验证了一个包含4个项目的JFLS,在评估TMD患者下颌功能方面具有良好的信度和效度,在临床实践中具有简化评估流程的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simplified Jaw Functional Limitation Scale for Temporomandibular Disorders: Psychometric Evaluation.

Objective: This study aimed to simplify the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS) and evaluate its reliability and validity in assessing jaw function in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in primary care.

Methods: TMD patients and non-TMD participants were assessed using Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Demographic data and the 8-item JFLS questionnaire were collected to quantify jaw functional restriction. Confirmatory factor analysis tested the validity of JFLS-8 using chi-square, comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and root mean square residual (RMR). The study selected key items from each domain to create a 4-item JFLS for further testing. Exploratory factor analysis, reliability, and validity tests were conducted.

Results: Analysis included 671 valid questionnaires (502 TMD patients, 169 non-TMD participants). JFLS-8 exhibited satisfactory fit among TMD patients (RMSEA = 0.143, CFI = 0.881, RMR = 0.567). JFLS-4 retained items with high factor loadings: JFLS1 (0.935), JFLS2 (0.923), JFLS7 (0.766), and JFLS5 (0.713). The simplified JFLS-4 showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.714) and validity (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 0.558, Bartlett's test < 0.001) among TMD patients.

Conclusion: A 4-item JFLS was developed and validated, demonstrating good reliability and validity in assessing mandibular function in TMD patients, exhibiting the potential to streamline evaluation processes in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral diseases
Oral diseases 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
325
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Oral Diseases is a multidisciplinary and international journal with a focus on head and neck disorders, edited by leaders in the field, Professor Giovanni Lodi (Editor-in-Chief, Milan, Italy), Professor Stefano Petti (Deputy Editor, Rome, Italy) and Associate Professor Gulshan Sunavala-Dossabhoy (Deputy Editor, Shreveport, LA, USA). The journal is pre-eminent in oral medicine. Oral Diseases specifically strives to link often-isolated areas of dentistry and medicine through broad-based scholarship that includes well-designed and controlled clinical research, analytical epidemiology, and the translation of basic science in pre-clinical studies. The journal typically publishes articles relevant to many related medical specialties including especially dermatology, gastroenterology, hematology, immunology, infectious diseases, neuropsychiatry, oncology and otolaryngology. The essential requirement is that all submitted research is hypothesis-driven, with significant positive and negative results both welcomed. Equal publication emphasis is placed on etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信