澳大利亚一家儿科医院的专科免疫服务干预后,免疫不良事件儿童的疫苗接种率提高。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Jialin Sabrina Yee, Rebecca Doyle, Sophie Chien-Hui Wen
{"title":"澳大利亚一家儿科医院的专科免疫服务干预后,免疫不良事件儿童的疫苗接种率提高。","authors":"Jialin Sabrina Yee, Rebecca Doyle, Sophie Chien-Hui Wen","doi":"10.1097/INF.0000000000004719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) have significant implications for public health, potentially leading to decreased immunization rates and vaccine hesitancy. Understanding the characteristics and outcomes of children experiencing AEFI is crucial for effective intervention strategies and informed decision-making. This study aimed to describe the diverse range of AEFI presentations, identify common referral sources and assess factors influencing vaccination uptake following specialist consultation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2019 to 2022, analyzing AEFI data from 191 children referred to a Specialist Immunization Service (SIS) at an Australian pediatric health service. Demographic data, referral details, vaccination history, and AEFI types were considered. Statistical analyses, including univariate and multivariate models, were employed to predict vaccination outcomes post-SIS consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of children referred was 2 years. General practitioners were the major referral source (68%). Urticarial rash was the most prevalent AEFI referred (29%). Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine was the most implicated vaccine (38%). The majority (69%) were successfully vaccinated following SIS consultation with 3% experiencing a subsequent AEFI (all mild). Older age is found to be associated with less likelihood for vaccination (odds ratio = 0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.88-0.99, P = 0.027). Formal reporting of AEFI was low (26%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Severe adverse events, including anaphylaxis, were rare, and a SIS played an important role in vaccinating children following AEFI. Vaccination following urticarial rash is likely safe, and options such as a drop-in immunization center in a hospital setting may reduce delay to the next dose in scheduled vaccinations following AEFI. AEFI reporting needs to be promoted, and a patient-initiated reporting system may enhance this.</p>","PeriodicalId":19858,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Uptake of Vaccinations in Children With Adverse Events Following Immunization After Specialist Immunization Service Intervention in an Australian Pediatric Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Jialin Sabrina Yee, Rebecca Doyle, Sophie Chien-Hui Wen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/INF.0000000000004719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) have significant implications for public health, potentially leading to decreased immunization rates and vaccine hesitancy. Understanding the characteristics and outcomes of children experiencing AEFI is crucial for effective intervention strategies and informed decision-making. This study aimed to describe the diverse range of AEFI presentations, identify common referral sources and assess factors influencing vaccination uptake following specialist consultation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2019 to 2022, analyzing AEFI data from 191 children referred to a Specialist Immunization Service (SIS) at an Australian pediatric health service. Demographic data, referral details, vaccination history, and AEFI types were considered. Statistical analyses, including univariate and multivariate models, were employed to predict vaccination outcomes post-SIS consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of children referred was 2 years. General practitioners were the major referral source (68%). Urticarial rash was the most prevalent AEFI referred (29%). Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine was the most implicated vaccine (38%). The majority (69%) were successfully vaccinated following SIS consultation with 3% experiencing a subsequent AEFI (all mild). Older age is found to be associated with less likelihood for vaccination (odds ratio = 0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.88-0.99, P = 0.027). Formal reporting of AEFI was low (26%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Severe adverse events, including anaphylaxis, were rare, and a SIS played an important role in vaccinating children following AEFI. Vaccination following urticarial rash is likely safe, and options such as a drop-in immunization center in a hospital setting may reduce delay to the next dose in scheduled vaccinations following AEFI. AEFI reporting needs to be promoted, and a patient-initiated reporting system may enhance this.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000004719\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000004719","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫不良事件(AEFI)对公共卫生具有重要影响,可能导致免疫率下降和疫苗犹豫。了解经历AEFI的儿童的特征和结果对于有效的干预策略和明智的决策至关重要。本研究旨在描述AEFI表现的不同范围,确定常见的转诊来源,并评估专家咨询后影响疫苗接种的因素。方法:从2019年到2022年进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究,分析了澳大利亚儿科卫生服务中心专科免疫服务(SIS)的191名儿童的AEFI数据。考虑了人口统计数据、转诊详细信息、疫苗接种史和AEFI类型。统计分析,包括单变量和多变量模型,用于预测sis咨询后的疫苗接种结果。结果:患儿中位年龄为2岁。全科医生是主要的转诊来源(68%)。风疹是AEFI中最常见的(29%)。肺炎球菌结合疫苗是最受影响的疫苗(38%)。大多数(69%)在SIS咨询后成功接种疫苗,3%随后经历AEFI(均为轻度)。年龄越大,接种疫苗的可能性越小(优势比= 0.93,95%可信区间:0.88-0.99,P = 0.027)。正式报告AEFI的比例较低(26%)。结论:严重不良事件,包括过敏反应,是罕见的,并且SIS在AEFI后接种儿童中发挥了重要作用。荨麻疹后接种疫苗可能是安全的,在医院设置的定点免疫中心等选择可能会减少在AEFI后计划接种下一剂疫苗的延迟。需要促进AEFI报告,而患者发起的报告系统可能会加强这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved Uptake of Vaccinations in Children With Adverse Events Following Immunization After Specialist Immunization Service Intervention in an Australian Pediatric Hospital.

Background: Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) have significant implications for public health, potentially leading to decreased immunization rates and vaccine hesitancy. Understanding the characteristics and outcomes of children experiencing AEFI is crucial for effective intervention strategies and informed decision-making. This study aimed to describe the diverse range of AEFI presentations, identify common referral sources and assess factors influencing vaccination uptake following specialist consultation.

Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2019 to 2022, analyzing AEFI data from 191 children referred to a Specialist Immunization Service (SIS) at an Australian pediatric health service. Demographic data, referral details, vaccination history, and AEFI types were considered. Statistical analyses, including univariate and multivariate models, were employed to predict vaccination outcomes post-SIS consultation.

Results: The median age of children referred was 2 years. General practitioners were the major referral source (68%). Urticarial rash was the most prevalent AEFI referred (29%). Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine was the most implicated vaccine (38%). The majority (69%) were successfully vaccinated following SIS consultation with 3% experiencing a subsequent AEFI (all mild). Older age is found to be associated with less likelihood for vaccination (odds ratio = 0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.88-0.99, P = 0.027). Formal reporting of AEFI was low (26%).

Conclusions: Severe adverse events, including anaphylaxis, were rare, and a SIS played an important role in vaccinating children following AEFI. Vaccination following urticarial rash is likely safe, and options such as a drop-in immunization center in a hospital setting may reduce delay to the next dose in scheduled vaccinations following AEFI. AEFI reporting needs to be promoted, and a patient-initiated reporting system may enhance this.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal® (PIDJ) is a complete, up-to-the-minute resource on infectious diseases in children. Through a mix of original studies, informative review articles, and unique case reports, PIDJ delivers the latest insights on combating disease in children — from state-of-the-art diagnostic techniques to the most effective drug therapies and other treatment protocols. It is a resource that can improve patient care and stimulate your personal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信