Lorenzo Marchetti, Benjamin D Rogers, Amit Patel, Daniel Sifrim, C Prakash Gyawali
{"title":"原发性蠕动是胃食管反流后反流清除的主要机制。","authors":"Lorenzo Marchetti, Benjamin D Rogers, Amit Patel, Daniel Sifrim, C Prakash Gyawali","doi":"10.1111/nmo.15001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Refluxate volume and pH drop following gastroesophageal reflux are mostly cleared by peristalsis. We evaluated the roles of primary volume clearing peristaltic wave (VCPW), secondary VCPW, post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW), and late primary peristaltic wave (LPPW) in refluxate clearance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed pH-impedance studies performed off therapy in 40 patients with typical esophageal symptoms. Mechanism of refluxate clearance was evaluated for each reflux episode (primary VCPW vs. secondary VCPW vs. none), as well as presence of PSPW, LPPW when PSPW was absent, and pH recovery with each mechanism. Per-episode and per-patient analyses determined the dominant mechanism of refluxate clearance and pH recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 958 reflux episodes, 88% were acidic. A primary VCPW was the dominant mechanism for volume clearance (48.4% acid, 47.8% non-acid reflux episodes), and ≥ 50% pH recovery (58.7%). Of reflux episodes lacking pH recovery, PSPW resulted in ≥ 50% pH recovery in 40.2%, and LPPW in 60.9%. In logistic regression models, primary peristaltic wave (primary VCPW, PSPW, or LPPW) had the highest likelihood of pH recovery in per-episode analysis (OR 2.1, CI 1.3-3.0, p < 0.001), and in per-patient analysis (OR 11.0, CI 1.5-20.5, p = 0.025), among which primary VCPW was the most effective (OR 3.4, CI 1.5-7.7, p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A primary peristaltic wave from a swallow, either in the form of a VCPW, PSPW, or LPPW, is the dominant mechanism of pH recovery after gastroesophageal reflux. When a primary VCPW does not correct pH drop, PSPW, and LPPW are equivalent salvage mechanisms for pH recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e15001"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary Peristalsis Is the Dominant Mechanism of Refluxate Clearance Following Gastroesophageal Reflux.\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Marchetti, Benjamin D Rogers, Amit Patel, Daniel Sifrim, C Prakash Gyawali\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nmo.15001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Refluxate volume and pH drop following gastroesophageal reflux are mostly cleared by peristalsis. We evaluated the roles of primary volume clearing peristaltic wave (VCPW), secondary VCPW, post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW), and late primary peristaltic wave (LPPW) in refluxate clearance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed pH-impedance studies performed off therapy in 40 patients with typical esophageal symptoms. Mechanism of refluxate clearance was evaluated for each reflux episode (primary VCPW vs. secondary VCPW vs. none), as well as presence of PSPW, LPPW when PSPW was absent, and pH recovery with each mechanism. Per-episode and per-patient analyses determined the dominant mechanism of refluxate clearance and pH recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 958 reflux episodes, 88% were acidic. A primary VCPW was the dominant mechanism for volume clearance (48.4% acid, 47.8% non-acid reflux episodes), and ≥ 50% pH recovery (58.7%). Of reflux episodes lacking pH recovery, PSPW resulted in ≥ 50% pH recovery in 40.2%, and LPPW in 60.9%. In logistic regression models, primary peristaltic wave (primary VCPW, PSPW, or LPPW) had the highest likelihood of pH recovery in per-episode analysis (OR 2.1, CI 1.3-3.0, p < 0.001), and in per-patient analysis (OR 11.0, CI 1.5-20.5, p = 0.025), among which primary VCPW was the most effective (OR 3.4, CI 1.5-7.7, p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A primary peristaltic wave from a swallow, either in the form of a VCPW, PSPW, or LPPW, is the dominant mechanism of pH recovery after gastroesophageal reflux. When a primary VCPW does not correct pH drop, PSPW, and LPPW are equivalent salvage mechanisms for pH recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e15001\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.15001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.15001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:胃食管反流后的反流体积和pH值下降大多通过蠕动清除。我们评估了初级容积清除蠕动波(VCPW)、次级VCPW、反流后吞咽诱导蠕动波(PSPW)和晚期初级蠕动波(LPPW)在反流清除中的作用。方法:我们回顾性分析了40例有典型食管症状的患者在治疗结束后进行的ph阻抗研究。评估每次反流发作的反流清除机制(原发性VCPW、继发性VCPW、无VCPW)、PSPW的存在、PSPW不存在时的LPPW,以及每种机制下的pH恢复。每次发作和每个患者的分析确定了反流清除和pH恢复的主要机制。结果:958例反流发作中,88%为酸性。原发性VCPW是体积清除率(48.4%的胃酸倒流,47.8%的非胃酸倒流)和≥50%的pH恢复(58.7%)的主要机制。在缺乏pH恢复的反流发作中,PSPW导致pH恢复≥50%的占40.2%,LPPW导致pH恢复的占60.9%。在logistic回归模型中,每次发作分析中,原发性蠕动波(原发性VCPW、PSPW或LPPW)具有最高的pH恢复可能性(or 2.1, CI 1.3-3.0, p)。结论:吞咽产生的原发性蠕动波,无论是VCPW、PSPW还是LPPW,都是胃食管反流后pH恢复的主要机制。当初级VCPW不能纠正pH下降时,PSPW和LPPW是等效的pH恢复救助机制。
Primary Peristalsis Is the Dominant Mechanism of Refluxate Clearance Following Gastroesophageal Reflux.
Background: Refluxate volume and pH drop following gastroesophageal reflux are mostly cleared by peristalsis. We evaluated the roles of primary volume clearing peristaltic wave (VCPW), secondary VCPW, post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW), and late primary peristaltic wave (LPPW) in refluxate clearance.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed pH-impedance studies performed off therapy in 40 patients with typical esophageal symptoms. Mechanism of refluxate clearance was evaluated for each reflux episode (primary VCPW vs. secondary VCPW vs. none), as well as presence of PSPW, LPPW when PSPW was absent, and pH recovery with each mechanism. Per-episode and per-patient analyses determined the dominant mechanism of refluxate clearance and pH recovery.
Results: Of 958 reflux episodes, 88% were acidic. A primary VCPW was the dominant mechanism for volume clearance (48.4% acid, 47.8% non-acid reflux episodes), and ≥ 50% pH recovery (58.7%). Of reflux episodes lacking pH recovery, PSPW resulted in ≥ 50% pH recovery in 40.2%, and LPPW in 60.9%. In logistic regression models, primary peristaltic wave (primary VCPW, PSPW, or LPPW) had the highest likelihood of pH recovery in per-episode analysis (OR 2.1, CI 1.3-3.0, p < 0.001), and in per-patient analysis (OR 11.0, CI 1.5-20.5, p = 0.025), among which primary VCPW was the most effective (OR 3.4, CI 1.5-7.7, p = 0.003).
Conclusions: A primary peristaltic wave from a swallow, either in the form of a VCPW, PSPW, or LPPW, is the dominant mechanism of pH recovery after gastroesophageal reflux. When a primary VCPW does not correct pH drop, PSPW, and LPPW are equivalent salvage mechanisms for pH recovery.
期刊介绍:
Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.