运动中相对能量缺乏的筛查:女性耐力运动员临床指标的检测。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Paulina Wasserfurth, Robin Halioua, Désirée Toepffer, Zoë Lautz, Helena Engel, Anna Katarina Melin, Monica Klungland Torstveit, Malte Christian Claussen, Karsten Koehler
{"title":"运动中相对能量缺乏的筛查:女性耐力运动员临床指标的检测。","authors":"Paulina Wasserfurth, Robin Halioua, Désirée Toepffer, Zoë Lautz, Helena Engel, Anna Katarina Melin, Monica Klungland Torstveit, Malte Christian Claussen, Karsten Koehler","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose was to evaluate the individual and combined use of the Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire (LEAF-Q) and the Brief Eating Disorder in Athletes Questionnaire (BEDA-Q) to detect clinical indicators associated with Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 50 female endurance athletes training ≥4x/week completed the LEAF-Q and BEDA-Q and were assessed for presence of selected REDs indicators. Athletes meeting the criteria for mild or more severe REDs severity/risk according to the International Olympic Committee REDs Clinical Assessment Tool Version 2 (IOC REDs CAT2) were classified as REDs cases. Diagnostic properties of the German versions of the LEAF-Q and BEDA-Q were assessed at different cut-offs using receiver operating characteristics calculations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen (28%) athletes were classified as REDs cases. The LEAF-Q had a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 50%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 38% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 86%. For detection of disordered eating behaviour/eating disorder (DE/ED), the BEDA-Q showed a sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 76%, respectively, with a PPV of 68% and NPV of 79%. Out of 14 REDs cases, nine (64%) scored positive in the LEAF-Q and BEDA-Q. Two athletes (14%) scored positive only in the LEAF-Q and one athlete scored positive only in the BEDA-Q. Two REDs cases remained undetected by both questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among German female endurance athletes, the LEAF-Q and BEDA-Q are good screening tools to detect REDs cases with mild or more severe severity/risk as classified according to the IOC REDs CAT2. Further clinical assessments should be initiated when athletes score positive in at least one of the questionnaires.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport: Detection of Clinical Indicators in Female Endurance Athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Paulina Wasserfurth, Robin Halioua, Désirée Toepffer, Zoë Lautz, Helena Engel, Anna Katarina Melin, Monica Klungland Torstveit, Malte Christian Claussen, Karsten Koehler\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose was to evaluate the individual and combined use of the Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire (LEAF-Q) and the Brief Eating Disorder in Athletes Questionnaire (BEDA-Q) to detect clinical indicators associated with Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 50 female endurance athletes training ≥4x/week completed the LEAF-Q and BEDA-Q and were assessed for presence of selected REDs indicators. Athletes meeting the criteria for mild or more severe REDs severity/risk according to the International Olympic Committee REDs Clinical Assessment Tool Version 2 (IOC REDs CAT2) were classified as REDs cases. Diagnostic properties of the German versions of the LEAF-Q and BEDA-Q were assessed at different cut-offs using receiver operating characteristics calculations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen (28%) athletes were classified as REDs cases. The LEAF-Q had a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 50%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 38% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 86%. For detection of disordered eating behaviour/eating disorder (DE/ED), the BEDA-Q showed a sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 76%, respectively, with a PPV of 68% and NPV of 79%. Out of 14 REDs cases, nine (64%) scored positive in the LEAF-Q and BEDA-Q. Two athletes (14%) scored positive only in the LEAF-Q and one athlete scored positive only in the BEDA-Q. Two REDs cases remained undetected by both questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among German female endurance athletes, the LEAF-Q and BEDA-Q are good screening tools to detect REDs cases with mild or more severe severity/risk as classified according to the IOC REDs CAT2. Further clinical assessments should be initiated when athletes score positive in at least one of the questionnaires.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003644\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003644","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价女性低能量可用性问卷(LEAF-Q)和运动员短暂饮食失调问卷(BEDA-Q)在检测运动中相对能量缺乏(red)相关临床指标方面的单独和联合应用。方法:在这项横断面研究中,50名训练≥4次/周的女性耐力运动员完成了LEAF-Q和BEDA-Q,并评估了所选red指标的存在。根据国际奥委会red临床评估工具第2版(IOC REDs CAT2),符合轻度或更严重的red严重程度/风险标准的运动员被归类为red病例。德国版本的LEAF-Q和BEDA-Q的诊断特性在不同的截止点使用接收机工作特性计算进行评估。结果:14例(28%)运动员为红魔。LEAF-Q的敏感性为79%,特异性为50%,阳性预测值为38%,阴性预测值为86%。对于饮食行为紊乱/饮食失调(DE/ED)的检测,BEDA-Q的灵敏度和特异性分别为71%和76%,PPV为68%,NPV为79%。14例red患者中,9例(64%)的LEAF-Q和BEDA-Q呈阳性。两名运动员(14%)仅在LEAF-Q中呈阳性,一名运动员仅在BEDA-Q中呈阳性。两份问卷均未发现两例红魔病例。结论:在德国女性耐力运动员中,LEAF-Q和BEDA-Q是很好的筛查工具,可以检测出根据IOC REDs CAT2分类的轻度或更严重的red病例。当运动员在至少一份问卷中得分为阳性时,应开始进一步的临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening for Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport: Detection of Clinical Indicators in Female Endurance Athletes.

Purpose: The purpose was to evaluate the individual and combined use of the Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire (LEAF-Q) and the Brief Eating Disorder in Athletes Questionnaire (BEDA-Q) to detect clinical indicators associated with Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs).

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 50 female endurance athletes training ≥4x/week completed the LEAF-Q and BEDA-Q and were assessed for presence of selected REDs indicators. Athletes meeting the criteria for mild or more severe REDs severity/risk according to the International Olympic Committee REDs Clinical Assessment Tool Version 2 (IOC REDs CAT2) were classified as REDs cases. Diagnostic properties of the German versions of the LEAF-Q and BEDA-Q were assessed at different cut-offs using receiver operating characteristics calculations.

Results: Fourteen (28%) athletes were classified as REDs cases. The LEAF-Q had a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 50%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 38% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 86%. For detection of disordered eating behaviour/eating disorder (DE/ED), the BEDA-Q showed a sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 76%, respectively, with a PPV of 68% and NPV of 79%. Out of 14 REDs cases, nine (64%) scored positive in the LEAF-Q and BEDA-Q. Two athletes (14%) scored positive only in the LEAF-Q and one athlete scored positive only in the BEDA-Q. Two REDs cases remained undetected by both questionnaires.

Conclusions: Among German female endurance athletes, the LEAF-Q and BEDA-Q are good screening tools to detect REDs cases with mild or more severe severity/risk as classified according to the IOC REDs CAT2. Further clinical assessments should be initiated when athletes score positive in at least one of the questionnaires.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信