韩国商业肉鸡养殖场减少抗菌药物使用的生物安全措施。

IF 1.8 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Journal of Poultry Science Pub Date : 2025-01-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2141/jpsa.2025001
Min Beom Kim, Young Ju Lee
{"title":"韩国商业肉鸡养殖场减少抗菌药物使用的生物安全措施。","authors":"Min Beom Kim, Young Ju Lee","doi":"10.2141/jpsa.2025001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Farm biosecurity is valuable for reducing the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials. However, its relationship with antimicrobial usage can be difficult to assess because of multiple factors. This study evaluated the impact of biosecurity practices on productivity, frequency of antimicrobial use, and development of antimicrobial resistance. Among factors related to biosecurity, mortality rate <2% within one week of age, survival rate >98%, and production index >350 in farms in which: bedding was not reused or only reused once, regular advice and biosecurity training was provided by poultry veterinarians, distinctions between clean and dirty areas were strictly enforced at all times, workers used farm biosecurity manuals, or disinfection guidelines were fully implemented, including cleaning before introducing new flocks and daily disinfection throughout growth, were significantly higher than those in farms without these measures (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The absence of biosecurity practices increased antimicrobial use to one (25.7%), two (39.2%), and three (25.7%) times (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In farms that implemented biosecurity practices, the antimicrobial administration was significantly increased to two times (44.2%) (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with only 17.4% of farms using antimicrobials three times. The prevalence of environmental <i>Escherichia coli</i> resistant to multiple cephalosporins and chloramphenicol, which are not used on broiler farms, was significantly reduced by biosecurity practices (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Our findings indicate that improved biosecurity practices decrease antimicrobial use, decrease the incidence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, and help to eliminate resistant bacteria in farm environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":16883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Poultry Science","volume":"62 ","pages":"2025001"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11700789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biosecurity Practices for Reducing Antimicrobial Use in Commercial Broiler Farms in Korea.\",\"authors\":\"Min Beom Kim, Young Ju Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2141/jpsa.2025001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Farm biosecurity is valuable for reducing the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials. However, its relationship with antimicrobial usage can be difficult to assess because of multiple factors. This study evaluated the impact of biosecurity practices on productivity, frequency of antimicrobial use, and development of antimicrobial resistance. Among factors related to biosecurity, mortality rate <2% within one week of age, survival rate >98%, and production index >350 in farms in which: bedding was not reused or only reused once, regular advice and biosecurity training was provided by poultry veterinarians, distinctions between clean and dirty areas were strictly enforced at all times, workers used farm biosecurity manuals, or disinfection guidelines were fully implemented, including cleaning before introducing new flocks and daily disinfection throughout growth, were significantly higher than those in farms without these measures (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The absence of biosecurity practices increased antimicrobial use to one (25.7%), two (39.2%), and three (25.7%) times (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In farms that implemented biosecurity practices, the antimicrobial administration was significantly increased to two times (44.2%) (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with only 17.4% of farms using antimicrobials three times. The prevalence of environmental <i>Escherichia coli</i> resistant to multiple cephalosporins and chloramphenicol, which are not used on broiler farms, was significantly reduced by biosecurity practices (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Our findings indicate that improved biosecurity practices decrease antimicrobial use, decrease the incidence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, and help to eliminate resistant bacteria in farm environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Poultry Science\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"2025001\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11700789/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Poultry Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.2025001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Poultry Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.2025001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农场生物安全对于减少滥用抗菌素具有重要意义。然而,由于多种因素,其与抗菌药物使用的关系可能难以评估。本研究评估了生物安全措施对生产力、抗菌药物使用频率和抗菌药物耐药性发展的影响。在与生物安全有关的因素中,死亡率为98%,生产指数为350,其中:床上用品不重复使用或只重复使用一次,家禽兽医提供定期建议和生物安全培训,始终严格执行清洁区和脏区,工人使用农场生物安全手册,或全面执行消毒指南,包括在引入新禽群之前进行清洁和在整个生长过程中每天进行消毒,这些措施显著高于未采取这些措施的农场(p < 0.05)。缺乏生物安全措施使抗菌药物使用增加了1倍(25.7%)、2倍(39.2%)和3倍(25.7%)(p < 0.05)。在实施生物安全措施的养殖场,抗菌药物使用次数显著增加至2次(44.2%)(p < 0.05),只有17.4%的养殖场使用了3次抗菌药物。未在肉鸡养殖场中使用的对多种头孢菌素和氯霉素耐药的环境大肠杆菌的流行率通过生物安全措施显著降低(p < 0.05)。我们的研究结果表明,改进的生物安全措施减少了抗菌素的使用,降低了耐药细菌的发生率,并有助于消除农场环境中的耐药细菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biosecurity Practices for Reducing Antimicrobial Use in Commercial Broiler Farms in Korea.

Farm biosecurity is valuable for reducing the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials. However, its relationship with antimicrobial usage can be difficult to assess because of multiple factors. This study evaluated the impact of biosecurity practices on productivity, frequency of antimicrobial use, and development of antimicrobial resistance. Among factors related to biosecurity, mortality rate <2% within one week of age, survival rate >98%, and production index >350 in farms in which: bedding was not reused or only reused once, regular advice and biosecurity training was provided by poultry veterinarians, distinctions between clean and dirty areas were strictly enforced at all times, workers used farm biosecurity manuals, or disinfection guidelines were fully implemented, including cleaning before introducing new flocks and daily disinfection throughout growth, were significantly higher than those in farms without these measures (p < 0.05). The absence of biosecurity practices increased antimicrobial use to one (25.7%), two (39.2%), and three (25.7%) times (p < 0.05). In farms that implemented biosecurity practices, the antimicrobial administration was significantly increased to two times (44.2%) (p < 0.05), with only 17.4% of farms using antimicrobials three times. The prevalence of environmental Escherichia coli resistant to multiple cephalosporins and chloramphenicol, which are not used on broiler farms, was significantly reduced by biosecurity practices (p < 0.05). Our findings indicate that improved biosecurity practices decrease antimicrobial use, decrease the incidence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, and help to eliminate resistant bacteria in farm environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Poultry Science
Journal of Poultry Science AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Poultry Science will publish original reports and reviews which either make an original contribution to fundamental science or are of obvious application to the industry. Subjects which are covered include: breeding and genetics, nutrition and feeds, physiology, reproduction, immunology, behavior, environmental science, management and housing welfare, processing and products, and health in poultry. Submission of original articles to the Journal is open to all poultry researchers. The review articles are invited papers written by international outstanding researchers. Articles will be published in English, American style.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信