某农村教学医院7年剖宫产的Robson分类分析及趋势

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Mahathi Nadella, Shyam S Maila, Indira Nagelli, Kalpana Basany
{"title":"某农村教学医院7年剖宫产的Robson分类分析及趋势","authors":"Mahathi Nadella, Shyam S Maila, Indira Nagelli, Kalpana Basany","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_516_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A ten-group classification system of caesarean section was proposed by Michael Robson in 2001. It is helpful in comparing the rates of caesarean section between hospitals. The objective of this study was to determine the caesarean section rates to analyse trends of caesarean section and classify according to Robson's categories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted from 2016 to 2022. A total of 3176 women who underwent caesarean section were grouped under Robson's ten-group classification system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common group was Group 5 (All multiparous women with at least one previous uterine scar, with single cephalic pregnancy, ≥37 weeks gestation) followed by Group 2 (Nulliparous women, with single cephalic pregnancy, >37 weeks gestation who either had labour induced or were delivered by caesarean section before labour). Results were obtained for the specified period (from 2016 to 2022), and Group 5 contributes more to the total CS rates (45% in 2016, 46% in 2017, 46% in 2018, 57% in 2019, 49% in 2020, 52% in 2021, 54% in 2022), followed by Group 2 (20% in 2016, 17% in 2017, 18% in 2018, 19% in 2019, 26% in 2020, 24% in 2021, 24% in 2022).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnant women with prior uterine scars contribute more to caesarean section rates according to Robson's categories. Hence, strategies must be implemented to lower the primary caesarean section rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"13 12","pages":"5550-5554"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11709025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis and trends of caesarean sections using Robson's classification over 7-year period at a rural teaching hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Mahathi Nadella, Shyam S Maila, Indira Nagelli, Kalpana Basany\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_516_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A ten-group classification system of caesarean section was proposed by Michael Robson in 2001. It is helpful in comparing the rates of caesarean section between hospitals. The objective of this study was to determine the caesarean section rates to analyse trends of caesarean section and classify according to Robson's categories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted from 2016 to 2022. A total of 3176 women who underwent caesarean section were grouped under Robson's ten-group classification system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common group was Group 5 (All multiparous women with at least one previous uterine scar, with single cephalic pregnancy, ≥37 weeks gestation) followed by Group 2 (Nulliparous women, with single cephalic pregnancy, >37 weeks gestation who either had labour induced or were delivered by caesarean section before labour). Results were obtained for the specified period (from 2016 to 2022), and Group 5 contributes more to the total CS rates (45% in 2016, 46% in 2017, 46% in 2018, 57% in 2019, 49% in 2020, 52% in 2021, 54% in 2022), followed by Group 2 (20% in 2016, 17% in 2017, 18% in 2018, 19% in 2019, 26% in 2020, 24% in 2021, 24% in 2022).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnant women with prior uterine scars contribute more to caesarean section rates according to Robson's categories. Hence, strategies must be implemented to lower the primary caesarean section rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"volume\":\"13 12\",\"pages\":\"5550-5554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11709025/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_516_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_516_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Michael Robson于2001年提出了剖宫产手术的十组分类体系。比较不同医院的剖宫产率是有帮助的。本研究的目的是确定剖宫产率,分析剖宫产趋势,并根据Robson分类进行分类。方法:横断面研究时间为2016 - 2022年。共有3176名接受剖腹产手术的妇女按照罗布森的十组分类系统进行分组。结果:最常见的是第5组(所有多胎妇女,既往至少有一个子宫瘢痕,单头妊娠,妊娠≥37周),其次是第2组(未分娩妇女,单头妊娠,妊娠0 ~ 37周,引产或分娩前剖腹产)。在特定时期(2016年至2022年)得出的结果显示,第5组对总CS率的贡献更高(2016年为45%,2017年为46%,2018年为46%,2019年为57%,2020年为49%,2021年为52%,2022年为54%),其次是第2组(2016年为20%,2017年为17%,2018年为18%,2019年为19%,2020年为26%,2021年为24%,2022年为24%)。结论:根据Robson分类,既往有子宫瘢痕的孕妇剖宫产率较高。因此,必须实施降低初次剖宫产率的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis and trends of caesarean sections using Robson's classification over 7-year period at a rural teaching hospital.

Background: A ten-group classification system of caesarean section was proposed by Michael Robson in 2001. It is helpful in comparing the rates of caesarean section between hospitals. The objective of this study was to determine the caesarean section rates to analyse trends of caesarean section and classify according to Robson's categories.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from 2016 to 2022. A total of 3176 women who underwent caesarean section were grouped under Robson's ten-group classification system.

Results: The most common group was Group 5 (All multiparous women with at least one previous uterine scar, with single cephalic pregnancy, ≥37 weeks gestation) followed by Group 2 (Nulliparous women, with single cephalic pregnancy, >37 weeks gestation who either had labour induced or were delivered by caesarean section before labour). Results were obtained for the specified period (from 2016 to 2022), and Group 5 contributes more to the total CS rates (45% in 2016, 46% in 2017, 46% in 2018, 57% in 2019, 49% in 2020, 52% in 2021, 54% in 2022), followed by Group 2 (20% in 2016, 17% in 2017, 18% in 2018, 19% in 2019, 26% in 2020, 24% in 2021, 24% in 2022).

Conclusion: Pregnant women with prior uterine scars contribute more to caesarean section rates according to Robson's categories. Hence, strategies must be implemented to lower the primary caesarean section rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信