不同护理水平的头痛诊断和ICHD-3标准之间的一致性。

IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lucas Hendrik Overeem, Marlene Ulrich, Mira Pauline Fitzek, Kristin Sophie Lange, Ja Bin Hong, Uwe Reuter, Bianca Raffaelli
{"title":"不同护理水平的头痛诊断和ICHD-3标准之间的一致性。","authors":"Lucas Hendrik Overeem, Marlene Ulrich, Mira Pauline Fitzek, Kristin Sophie Lange, Ja Bin Hong, Uwe Reuter, Bianca Raffaelli","doi":"10.1186/s10194-024-01937-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing headache disorders poses significant challenges, particularly in primary and secondary levels of care (PSLC), potentially leading to misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis. This study evaluates diagnostic agreement for migraine, tension-type headache (TTH), and cluster headache (CH) between PSLC and tertiary care (TLC) and assesses adherence to the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition (ICHD-3) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis was conducted at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin's tertiary headache center. The patients' self-reported diagnoses from the PSLC were compared with those in TLC and with ICHD-3 criteria. Cohen's kappa (κ) and R² were used to assess diagnostic agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,468 patients (43.4 ± 14.4 years; 74.5% women), 69.5% reported a diagnosis in PSLC, and 99.5% were diagnosed at their first TLC visit. Overall agreement between PSLC and TLC was 80% (κ = 0.55; R²=30%). Agreement between the PSLC and ICHD-3 was 77% for migraine, 82% for TTH, and 96% for CH (κ = 0.65; R²=41%). TLC diagnoses aligned with ICHD-3 in over 90%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate a significant degree of diagnostic agreement across different levels of care according to the ICHD-3 guidelines. However, there remains insufficient reliability in clinical diagnostics, highlighting the need for continued efforts to improve the early recognition and diagnostic accuracy and consistency of primary headaches to optimize patient care and treatment outcomes in Germany.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistency between headache diagnoses and ICHD-3 criteria across different levels of care.\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Hendrik Overeem, Marlene Ulrich, Mira Pauline Fitzek, Kristin Sophie Lange, Ja Bin Hong, Uwe Reuter, Bianca Raffaelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10194-024-01937-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing headache disorders poses significant challenges, particularly in primary and secondary levels of care (PSLC), potentially leading to misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis. This study evaluates diagnostic agreement for migraine, tension-type headache (TTH), and cluster headache (CH) between PSLC and tertiary care (TLC) and assesses adherence to the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition (ICHD-3) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis was conducted at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin's tertiary headache center. The patients' self-reported diagnoses from the PSLC were compared with those in TLC and with ICHD-3 criteria. Cohen's kappa (κ) and R² were used to assess diagnostic agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,468 patients (43.4 ± 14.4 years; 74.5% women), 69.5% reported a diagnosis in PSLC, and 99.5% were diagnosed at their first TLC visit. Overall agreement between PSLC and TLC was 80% (κ = 0.55; R²=30%). Agreement between the PSLC and ICHD-3 was 77% for migraine, 82% for TTH, and 96% for CH (κ = 0.65; R²=41%). TLC diagnoses aligned with ICHD-3 in over 90%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate a significant degree of diagnostic agreement across different levels of care according to the ICHD-3 guidelines. However, there remains insufficient reliability in clinical diagnostics, highlighting the need for continued efforts to improve the early recognition and diagnostic accuracy and consistency of primary headaches to optimize patient care and treatment outcomes in Germany.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715415/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01937-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01937-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:诊断头痛疾病面临重大挑战,特别是在初级和二级护理水平(PSLC),可能导致误诊和漏诊。本研究评估了PSLC和三级护理(TLC)之间对偏头痛、紧张性头痛(TTH)和丛集性头痛(CH)的诊断一致性,并评估了对国际头痛疾病分类第三版(ICHD-3)指南的遵守情况。方法:对柏林慈善医院(charity - Universitätsmedizin)三级头痛中心进行回顾性、横断面分析。将患者自我报告的PSLC诊断与TLC和ICHD-3标准进行比较。采用Cohen’s kappa (κ)和R²评价诊断一致性。结果:1468例患者(43.4±14.4年;74.5%的女性),69.5%的人报告了PSLC的诊断,99.5%的人在第一次TLC检查时被诊断出来。PSLC和TLC的总体一致性为80% (κ = 0.55;R²= 30%)。PSLC和ICHD-3在偏头痛中的一致性为77%,TTH的一致性为82%,CH的一致性为96% (κ = 0.65;R²= 41%)。超过90%的TLC诊断与ICHD-3相符。结论:我们的研究结果表明,根据ICHD-3指南,在不同水平的护理中诊断一致性显著。然而,临床诊断的可靠性仍然不足,这突出了德国需要继续努力提高原发性头痛的早期识别、诊断准确性和一致性,以优化患者护理和治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consistency between headache diagnoses and ICHD-3 criteria across different levels of care.

Background: Diagnosing headache disorders poses significant challenges, particularly in primary and secondary levels of care (PSLC), potentially leading to misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis. This study evaluates diagnostic agreement for migraine, tension-type headache (TTH), and cluster headache (CH) between PSLC and tertiary care (TLC) and assesses adherence to the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition (ICHD-3) guidelines.

Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis was conducted at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin's tertiary headache center. The patients' self-reported diagnoses from the PSLC were compared with those in TLC and with ICHD-3 criteria. Cohen's kappa (κ) and R² were used to assess diagnostic agreement.

Results: Among 1,468 patients (43.4 ± 14.4 years; 74.5% women), 69.5% reported a diagnosis in PSLC, and 99.5% were diagnosed at their first TLC visit. Overall agreement between PSLC and TLC was 80% (κ = 0.55; R²=30%). Agreement between the PSLC and ICHD-3 was 77% for migraine, 82% for TTH, and 96% for CH (κ = 0.65; R²=41%). TLC diagnoses aligned with ICHD-3 in over 90%.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate a significant degree of diagnostic agreement across different levels of care according to the ICHD-3 guidelines. However, there remains insufficient reliability in clinical diagnostics, highlighting the need for continued efforts to improve the early recognition and diagnostic accuracy and consistency of primary headaches to optimize patient care and treatment outcomes in Germany.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Headache and Pain
Journal of Headache and Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data. With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信