一项回顾性多中心研究:使用一种新型鞘系统对远端胆管癌浅表导管扩散的组织学诊断进行活检的有效性。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Mitsuru Okuno, Keisuke Iwata, Tsuyoshi Mukai, Takuji Iwashita, Takuji Tanaka, Akinori Maruta, Keisuke Kawashima, Ichiro Yasuda, Hisataka Moriwaki, Masahito Shimizu
{"title":"一项回顾性多中心研究:使用一种新型鞘系统对远端胆管癌浅表导管扩散的组织学诊断进行活检的有效性。","authors":"Mitsuru Okuno, Keisuke Iwata, Tsuyoshi Mukai, Takuji Iwashita, Takuji Tanaka, Akinori Maruta, Keisuke Kawashima, Ichiro Yasuda, Hisataka Moriwaki, Masahito Shimizu","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mapping biopsy (MB) can evaluate superficial ductal spread (SDS) through the histopathological diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma, enabling the selection of an appropriate surgical procedure. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of MB using a novel sheath system in distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 199 cholangiocarcinoma cases underwent preoperative diagnosis. Among them, 40, 21, and 26 cases underwent direct, sheath, and peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) MB, respectively, for dCCA. Each group was compared regarding their technical success rate and the diagnostic accuracy for SDS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although all cases achieved technical success, the median procedure time of POCS (48-min) tended to be longer than direct (33-min) and sheath MB (30-min) (p overall = .092). Diagnostic specificity and accuracy were significantly higher in the sheath group (95.2%, 95.2%) compared to the direct (71.0%, 70.0%) and POCS (60.9%, 57.7%) MB groups (p overall = .019 and .0094). Multivariate analysis revealed that the sheath MB group was an independent significant factor for the accurate margin diagnosis (OR 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01-0.86, p = .0358).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sheath MB method provided the most accurate histopathological diagnosis of SDS in dCCA. To obtain a larger tissue sample and avoid tumor cell contamination, sheath MB is worth performing to assess the accuracy of the preoperative SDS diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of mapping biopsy using a novel sheath system for the histological diagnosis of superficial ductal spread in distal cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Mitsuru Okuno, Keisuke Iwata, Tsuyoshi Mukai, Takuji Iwashita, Takuji Tanaka, Akinori Maruta, Keisuke Kawashima, Ichiro Yasuda, Hisataka Moriwaki, Masahito Shimizu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhbp.12103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mapping biopsy (MB) can evaluate superficial ductal spread (SDS) through the histopathological diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma, enabling the selection of an appropriate surgical procedure. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of MB using a novel sheath system in distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 199 cholangiocarcinoma cases underwent preoperative diagnosis. Among them, 40, 21, and 26 cases underwent direct, sheath, and peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) MB, respectively, for dCCA. Each group was compared regarding their technical success rate and the diagnostic accuracy for SDS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although all cases achieved technical success, the median procedure time of POCS (48-min) tended to be longer than direct (33-min) and sheath MB (30-min) (p overall = .092). Diagnostic specificity and accuracy were significantly higher in the sheath group (95.2%, 95.2%) compared to the direct (71.0%, 70.0%) and POCS (60.9%, 57.7%) MB groups (p overall = .019 and .0094). Multivariate analysis revealed that the sheath MB group was an independent significant factor for the accurate margin diagnosis (OR 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01-0.86, p = .0358).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sheath MB method provided the most accurate histopathological diagnosis of SDS in dCCA. To obtain a larger tissue sample and avoid tumor cell contamination, sheath MB is worth performing to assess the accuracy of the preoperative SDS diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12103\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12103","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:定位活检(Mapping biopsy, MB)可以通过胆管癌的组织病理学诊断来评估浅表导管扩散(SDS),从而选择合适的手术方式。这项回顾性研究评估了使用一种新型鞘系统的MB在远端胆管癌(dCCA)病例中的疗效。方法:对199例胆管癌患者进行术前诊断。其中40例、21例和26例分别行直接胆道镜、鞘镜和经口胆道镜(POCS) MB进行dCCA。比较各组的技术成功率和SDS的诊断准确性。结果:虽然所有病例都取得了技术上的成功,但POCS的中位手术时间(48分钟)往往长于直接(33分钟)和鞘内MB(30分钟)(p总体= 0.092)。鞘组的诊断特异性和准确性(95.2%,95.2%)明显高于直接(71.0%,70.0%)和POCS (60.9%, 57.7%) MB组(p总体=。019和0.0094)。多因素分析显示鞘性MB组是准确边缘诊断的独立显著因素(OR 0.11;95% CI: 0.01 ~ 0.86, p = 0.0358)。结论:鞘层MB法是dCCA中SDS最准确的组织病理学诊断方法。为了获得更大的组织样本并避免肿瘤细胞污染,鞘MB值得用于评估术前SDS诊断的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of mapping biopsy using a novel sheath system for the histological diagnosis of superficial ductal spread in distal cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study.

Background: Mapping biopsy (MB) can evaluate superficial ductal spread (SDS) through the histopathological diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma, enabling the selection of an appropriate surgical procedure. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of MB using a novel sheath system in distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) cases.

Methods: A total of 199 cholangiocarcinoma cases underwent preoperative diagnosis. Among them, 40, 21, and 26 cases underwent direct, sheath, and peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) MB, respectively, for dCCA. Each group was compared regarding their technical success rate and the diagnostic accuracy for SDS.

Results: Although all cases achieved technical success, the median procedure time of POCS (48-min) tended to be longer than direct (33-min) and sheath MB (30-min) (p overall = .092). Diagnostic specificity and accuracy were significantly higher in the sheath group (95.2%, 95.2%) compared to the direct (71.0%, 70.0%) and POCS (60.9%, 57.7%) MB groups (p overall = .019 and .0094). Multivariate analysis revealed that the sheath MB group was an independent significant factor for the accurate margin diagnosis (OR 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01-0.86, p = .0358).

Conclusions: The sheath MB method provided the most accurate histopathological diagnosis of SDS in dCCA. To obtain a larger tissue sample and avoid tumor cell contamination, sheath MB is worth performing to assess the accuracy of the preoperative SDS diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信