{"title":"皮肤紧致的客观化:300名女性与年龄相关的体内评价。","authors":"Alena Roessle, Martina Kerscher","doi":"10.1111/jocd.16773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The concept of “skin quality” (SQ) has gained widespread attention, with a recent international consensus defining it and outlining four “emergent perceptual categories” (EPCs), each accompanied by specific parameters and associated measurement methods. No research has confirmed whether the parameters linked to these EPCs vary objectively with age. This gap in data is significant, as understanding how these parameters correlate with age could be essential for creating an objective, age-adjusted classification of SQ.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to investigate the EPC skin firmness in female facial and non-facial skin in relation to age using biophysical measurements. Reference ranges for objective assessment were determined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients/Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Three hundred healthy women (20–69 years) were divided into five age groups. The correlation between age and skin firmness measured by Cutometer and Corneometer (Courage+Khazaka electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany) devices was evaluated across five anatomical sites: forehead, cheek, neck, décolleté, and the hand. Percentiles were used to generate reference ranges.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Statistical analysis discloses that R2 (<i>U</i><sub>a</sub>/<i>U</i><sub>f</sub>), R5 (<i>U</i><sub>r</sub>/<i>U</i><sub>e</sub>), and R7 (<i>U</i><sub>r</sub>/<i>U</i><sub>f</sub>) correlated with age for all five sites and are preferably assigned to the EPC skin firmness, whereby R2 and R7 showed the strongest correlation. For the neck, significant age-related changes were found in most of the Cutometer parameters. The stratum corneum (SC) hydration showed only low correlations with age.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>R2, R5, and R7 are reliable indicators of age-related changes in skin firmness, with established reference ranges that can aid in treatment decisions and SQ assessments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11712028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Objectification of Skin Firmness: In Vivo Evaluation of 300 Women in Relation to Age\",\"authors\":\"Alena Roessle, Martina Kerscher\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocd.16773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The concept of “skin quality” (SQ) has gained widespread attention, with a recent international consensus defining it and outlining four “emergent perceptual categories” (EPCs), each accompanied by specific parameters and associated measurement methods. No research has confirmed whether the parameters linked to these EPCs vary objectively with age. This gap in data is significant, as understanding how these parameters correlate with age could be essential for creating an objective, age-adjusted classification of SQ.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study was to investigate the EPC skin firmness in female facial and non-facial skin in relation to age using biophysical measurements. Reference ranges for objective assessment were determined.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patients/Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Three hundred healthy women (20–69 years) were divided into five age groups. The correlation between age and skin firmness measured by Cutometer and Corneometer (Courage+Khazaka electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany) devices was evaluated across five anatomical sites: forehead, cheek, neck, décolleté, and the hand. Percentiles were used to generate reference ranges.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Statistical analysis discloses that R2 (<i>U</i><sub>a</sub>/<i>U</i><sub>f</sub>), R5 (<i>U</i><sub>r</sub>/<i>U</i><sub>e</sub>), and R7 (<i>U</i><sub>r</sub>/<i>U</i><sub>f</sub>) correlated with age for all five sites and are preferably assigned to the EPC skin firmness, whereby R2 and R7 showed the strongest correlation. For the neck, significant age-related changes were found in most of the Cutometer parameters. The stratum corneum (SC) hydration showed only low correlations with age.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>R2, R5, and R7 are reliable indicators of age-related changes in skin firmness, with established reference ranges that can aid in treatment decisions and SQ assessments.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11712028/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.16773\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.16773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectification of Skin Firmness: In Vivo Evaluation of 300 Women in Relation to Age
Background
The concept of “skin quality” (SQ) has gained widespread attention, with a recent international consensus defining it and outlining four “emergent perceptual categories” (EPCs), each accompanied by specific parameters and associated measurement methods. No research has confirmed whether the parameters linked to these EPCs vary objectively with age. This gap in data is significant, as understanding how these parameters correlate with age could be essential for creating an objective, age-adjusted classification of SQ.
Aim
The aim of this study was to investigate the EPC skin firmness in female facial and non-facial skin in relation to age using biophysical measurements. Reference ranges for objective assessment were determined.
Patients/Methods
Three hundred healthy women (20–69 years) were divided into five age groups. The correlation between age and skin firmness measured by Cutometer and Corneometer (Courage+Khazaka electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany) devices was evaluated across five anatomical sites: forehead, cheek, neck, décolleté, and the hand. Percentiles were used to generate reference ranges.
Results
Statistical analysis discloses that R2 (Ua/Uf), R5 (Ur/Ue), and R7 (Ur/Uf) correlated with age for all five sites and are preferably assigned to the EPC skin firmness, whereby R2 and R7 showed the strongest correlation. For the neck, significant age-related changes were found in most of the Cutometer parameters. The stratum corneum (SC) hydration showed only low correlations with age.
Conclusions
R2, R5, and R7 are reliable indicators of age-related changes in skin firmness, with established reference ranges that can aid in treatment decisions and SQ assessments.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cosmetic dermatology with the aim to foster the highest standards of patient care in cosmetic dermatology. Published quarterly, the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology facilitates continuing professional development and provides a forum for the exchange of scientific research and innovative techniques.
The scope of coverage includes, but will not be limited to: healthy skin; skin maintenance; ageing skin; photodamage and photoprotection; rejuvenation; biochemistry, endocrinology and neuroimmunology of healthy skin; imaging; skin measurement; quality of life; skin types; sensitive skin; rosacea and acne; sebum; sweat; fat; phlebology; hair conservation, restoration and removal; nails and nail surgery; pigment; psychological and medicolegal issues; retinoids; cosmetic chemistry; dermopharmacy; cosmeceuticals; toiletries; striae; cellulite; cosmetic dermatological surgery; blepharoplasty; liposuction; surgical complications; botulinum; fillers, peels and dermabrasion; local and tumescent anaesthesia; electrosurgery; lasers, including laser physics, laser research and safety, vascular lasers, pigment lasers, hair removal lasers, tattoo removal lasers, resurfacing lasers, dermal remodelling lasers and laser complications.