{"title":"改良牵张装置用于颅面小畸形患者下颌牵张成骨的生物力学特性:模拟有限元分析研究。","authors":"Anna Liu, Changjin Huang, Wei Liu, Xiaojun Tang","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Finite element analysis (FEA) of the biomechanical properties of the modified extraoral distractor device used in the mandibular distraction of craniofacial microsomia patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Finite element analysis (FEA) models of 5 patients under 2 working conditions, the instance when the distractor is activated and when the distractor participates in mastication, were included in the current study. To conduct the FEA, load boundary conditions (35.6 N on the distractor for the first working condition and 50 N on the unoperated side, 100 N and 200 N on both sides for the second working condition) were applied. Besides, constraint boundary conditions and contact conditions were also applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With 5 or 3 bioabsorbable screws fixing the upper fixing plate, the maximal displacement of the mandible was <3 mm and the maximal stress distributed on distractor and bioabsorbable screws was less than the yield strength of corresponding materials under the 2 working conditions when setting 50 N on the unoperated side and 100 N on both sides for the second working condition. However, when setting 200 N on both sides for the second working condition, the maximal displacement of the mandible slightly increased, and stress distributed on distractor and bioabsorbable screws exceeded the yield strength of corresponding materials in some patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In most cases, both 5 and 3 poly-L-lactic acidscrews could firmly fix the distractor on the mandible without plastic deformation, although the situation would be different when the mastication force was too powerful.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Biomechanical Properties of A Modified Distraction Device Used in Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis for Craniofacial Microsomia Patients: A Simulation Finite Element Analysis Study.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Liu, Changjin Huang, Wei Liu, Xiaojun Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Finite element analysis (FEA) of the biomechanical properties of the modified extraoral distractor device used in the mandibular distraction of craniofacial microsomia patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Finite element analysis (FEA) models of 5 patients under 2 working conditions, the instance when the distractor is activated and when the distractor participates in mastication, were included in the current study. To conduct the FEA, load boundary conditions (35.6 N on the distractor for the first working condition and 50 N on the unoperated side, 100 N and 200 N on both sides for the second working condition) were applied. Besides, constraint boundary conditions and contact conditions were also applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With 5 or 3 bioabsorbable screws fixing the upper fixing plate, the maximal displacement of the mandible was <3 mm and the maximal stress distributed on distractor and bioabsorbable screws was less than the yield strength of corresponding materials under the 2 working conditions when setting 50 N on the unoperated side and 100 N on both sides for the second working condition. However, when setting 200 N on both sides for the second working condition, the maximal displacement of the mandible slightly increased, and stress distributed on distractor and bioabsorbable screws exceeded the yield strength of corresponding materials in some patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In most cases, both 5 and 3 poly-L-lactic acidscrews could firmly fix the distractor on the mandible without plastic deformation, although the situation would be different when the mastication force was too powerful.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Biomechanical Properties of A Modified Distraction Device Used in Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis for Craniofacial Microsomia Patients: A Simulation Finite Element Analysis Study.
Objective: Finite element analysis (FEA) of the biomechanical properties of the modified extraoral distractor device used in the mandibular distraction of craniofacial microsomia patients.
Materials and methods: Finite element analysis (FEA) models of 5 patients under 2 working conditions, the instance when the distractor is activated and when the distractor participates in mastication, were included in the current study. To conduct the FEA, load boundary conditions (35.6 N on the distractor for the first working condition and 50 N on the unoperated side, 100 N and 200 N on both sides for the second working condition) were applied. Besides, constraint boundary conditions and contact conditions were also applied.
Results: With 5 or 3 bioabsorbable screws fixing the upper fixing plate, the maximal displacement of the mandible was <3 mm and the maximal stress distributed on distractor and bioabsorbable screws was less than the yield strength of corresponding materials under the 2 working conditions when setting 50 N on the unoperated side and 100 N on both sides for the second working condition. However, when setting 200 N on both sides for the second working condition, the maximal displacement of the mandible slightly increased, and stress distributed on distractor and bioabsorbable screws exceeded the yield strength of corresponding materials in some patients.
Conclusion: In most cases, both 5 and 3 poly-L-lactic acidscrews could firmly fix the distractor on the mandible without plastic deformation, although the situation would be different when the mastication force was too powerful.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.