急性a型主动脉夹层近端吻合前胶毡法修复主动脉腔。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Muhammed Varol, Berk Arapi, Çiğdem Tel Üstünışık, Deniz Göksedef, Suat Nail Ömeroğlu, Gökhan İpek, Ozan Onur Balkanay
{"title":"急性a型主动脉夹层近端吻合前胶毡法修复主动脉腔。","authors":"Muhammed Varol, Berk Arapi, Çiğdem Tel Üstünışık, Deniz Göksedef, Suat Nail Ömeroğlu, Gökhan İpek, Ozan Onur Balkanay","doi":"10.1186/s13019-024-03227-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the advances in medicine, aortic dissection remains a cardiac surgery emergency with high mortality and morbidity rates. This study examined the effects of the Glue + Felt technique, which uses biological glue and felt to repair the proximal anastomotic site, on the outcomes of patients with acute type A aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 108 patients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection at our clinic between 2007 and 2020 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: the \"Glue + Felt Technique\" and the \"Bentall-De Bono\" groups, based on the surgical technique used for the aortic root. The effects of these two techniques on the development of intraoperative and postoperative complications and survival rates were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Glue + Felt technique was used for 76 patients, while the Bentall-De Bono technique was used for 32 patients. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in survival rates between the two groups over the entire follow-up period, both with and without propensity score matching (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively). However, no significant differences were observed in comparisons beyond the first 30 days of follow-up, either with or without propensity score matching (p = 0.573 and p = 0.561, respectively). The main factors contributing to this difference were the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp time (p < 0.05). During the average follow-up period of 46.2 ± 31.6 months, no re-intervention was required in patients from the Glue-Felt technique group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mortality rate in aortic dissection surgery is higher with more extensive surgical intervention as the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp time increases. Repairing the lumen and reducing operation time in suitable patients using the Glue-Felt technique for the proximal anastomotic site positively impacts postoperative complications and improves in-hospital and 30-day survival rates, without increasing long-term re-intervention rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aortic lumen repair with glue-felt technique before proximal anastomosis in acute type a aortic dissection surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammed Varol, Berk Arapi, Çiğdem Tel Üstünışık, Deniz Göksedef, Suat Nail Ömeroğlu, Gökhan İpek, Ozan Onur Balkanay\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13019-024-03227-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the advances in medicine, aortic dissection remains a cardiac surgery emergency with high mortality and morbidity rates. This study examined the effects of the Glue + Felt technique, which uses biological glue and felt to repair the proximal anastomotic site, on the outcomes of patients with acute type A aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 108 patients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection at our clinic between 2007 and 2020 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: the \\\"Glue + Felt Technique\\\" and the \\\"Bentall-De Bono\\\" groups, based on the surgical technique used for the aortic root. The effects of these two techniques on the development of intraoperative and postoperative complications and survival rates were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Glue + Felt technique was used for 76 patients, while the Bentall-De Bono technique was used for 32 patients. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in survival rates between the two groups over the entire follow-up period, both with and without propensity score matching (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively). However, no significant differences were observed in comparisons beyond the first 30 days of follow-up, either with or without propensity score matching (p = 0.573 and p = 0.561, respectively). The main factors contributing to this difference were the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp time (p < 0.05). During the average follow-up period of 46.2 ± 31.6 months, no re-intervention was required in patients from the Glue-Felt technique group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mortality rate in aortic dissection surgery is higher with more extensive surgical intervention as the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp time increases. Repairing the lumen and reducing operation time in suitable patients using the Glue-Felt technique for the proximal anastomotic site positively impacts postoperative complications and improves in-hospital and 30-day survival rates, without increasing long-term re-intervention rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707941/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-03227-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-03227-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管医学进步,主动脉夹层仍然是心脏外科急症,死亡率和发病率高。本研究探讨了Glue + Felt技术对急性A型主动脉夹层患者预后的影响,该技术使用生物胶和毡修复近端吻合口。方法:本研究纳入2007年至2020年在我院行急性A型主动脉夹层手术治疗的108例患者。根据主动脉根部的手术技术,将患者分为两组:“Glue + Felt technology”组和“Bentall-De Bono”组。统计分析两种技术对术中、术后并发症发生及生存率的影响。结果:76例采用Glue + Felt技术,32例采用Bentall-De Bono技术。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,在整个随访期间,两组患者的生存率存在显著差异,无论倾向评分是否匹配(p)。结论:随着体外循环和主动脉交叉夹持时间的增加,手术干预时间越长,主动脉夹层手术的死亡率越高。在合适的患者中,使用Glue-Felt技术修复近端吻合口,减少手术时间,对术后并发症有积极影响,提高了住院和30天生存率,而不增加长期再干预率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aortic lumen repair with glue-felt technique before proximal anastomosis in acute type a aortic dissection surgery.

Objectives: Despite the advances in medicine, aortic dissection remains a cardiac surgery emergency with high mortality and morbidity rates. This study examined the effects of the Glue + Felt technique, which uses biological glue and felt to repair the proximal anastomotic site, on the outcomes of patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

Methods: A total of 108 patients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection at our clinic between 2007 and 2020 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: the "Glue + Felt Technique" and the "Bentall-De Bono" groups, based on the surgical technique used for the aortic root. The effects of these two techniques on the development of intraoperative and postoperative complications and survival rates were statistically analyzed.

Results: The Glue + Felt technique was used for 76 patients, while the Bentall-De Bono technique was used for 32 patients. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in survival rates between the two groups over the entire follow-up period, both with and without propensity score matching (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively). However, no significant differences were observed in comparisons beyond the first 30 days of follow-up, either with or without propensity score matching (p = 0.573 and p = 0.561, respectively). The main factors contributing to this difference were the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp time (p < 0.05). During the average follow-up period of 46.2 ± 31.6 months, no re-intervention was required in patients from the Glue-Felt technique group.

Conclusions: The mortality rate in aortic dissection surgery is higher with more extensive surgical intervention as the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp time increases. Repairing the lumen and reducing operation time in suitable patients using the Glue-Felt technique for the proximal anastomotic site positively impacts postoperative complications and improves in-hospital and 30-day survival rates, without increasing long-term re-intervention rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
286
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields. Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信