盲定位支气管阻滞剂用于单肺通气的新技术:一项前瞻性、随机、交叉研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Seihee Min, Susie Yoon, Jiwon Han, Jeong-Hwa Seo, Jae-Hyon Bahk
{"title":"盲定位支气管阻滞剂用于单肺通气的新技术:一项前瞻性、随机、交叉研究。","authors":"Seihee Min, Susie Yoon, Jiwon Han, Jeong-Hwa Seo, Jae-Hyon Bahk","doi":"10.1186/s13019-024-03276-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several methods for blindly positioning bronchial blockers (BBs) for one-lung ventilation (OLV) have been proposed. However, these methods do not reliably ensure accurate positioning and proper direction. Here, we developed a clinically applicable two-stage maneuver by modifying a previously reported one-stage maneuver for successful insertion of a BB at the appropriate depth and direction in patients requiring lung isolation where a flexible bronchoscope (FOB) is not applicable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, crossover study was conducted at a tertiary university hospital and included 94 patients requiring OLV for elective thoracic surgery under general anesthesia. The patients underwent the one-stage maneuver followed by the two-stage maneuver and vice versa, and the success rates of the two methods were compared. After tracheal intubation, the deflated rigid-angle BB was inserted into the endotracheal tube (ET) until a pre-marked point indicating that the BB was just protruding from the ET tip. To identify the carinal depth without FOB, the BB balloon was inflated and advanced toward the intended side whilst monitoring abrupt changes in peak inspiratory pressure and expiratory tidal volume to indicate placement at the carina. In one-stage maneuver, the BB balloon was deflated and advanced 3 cm further from the estimated carinal depth. During the two-stage maneuver, the same procedure was performed to determine the carinal depth, and the deflated BB was withdrawn and reinserted to a predetermined depth with its tip directed 90 degree toward the target bronchus. The accuracy of BB positioning for both maneuvers was evaluated by a 4-point scale, with grades 1 and 2 considered acceptable for providing OLV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BB placement was more accurate in the two-stage maneuver than in the one-stage maneuver [88.0% (81/92) vs. 73.9% (68/92), relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]), 0.45 (0.23-0.88), P < 0.001]. This improvement was particularly significant when targeting the left main bronchus [84.8% (39/46) vs. 58.7% (27/46), relative risk (95% CI), 0.36 (0.17-0.79), P < 0.001)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel two-stage maneuver significantly improved the success rate of blindly positioning the BB.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02981537) on December 05, 2016.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel technique of blindly positioning bronchial blockers for one-lung ventilation: a prospective, randomized, crossover study.\",\"authors\":\"Seihee Min, Susie Yoon, Jiwon Han, Jeong-Hwa Seo, Jae-Hyon Bahk\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13019-024-03276-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several methods for blindly positioning bronchial blockers (BBs) for one-lung ventilation (OLV) have been proposed. However, these methods do not reliably ensure accurate positioning and proper direction. Here, we developed a clinically applicable two-stage maneuver by modifying a previously reported one-stage maneuver for successful insertion of a BB at the appropriate depth and direction in patients requiring lung isolation where a flexible bronchoscope (FOB) is not applicable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, crossover study was conducted at a tertiary university hospital and included 94 patients requiring OLV for elective thoracic surgery under general anesthesia. The patients underwent the one-stage maneuver followed by the two-stage maneuver and vice versa, and the success rates of the two methods were compared. After tracheal intubation, the deflated rigid-angle BB was inserted into the endotracheal tube (ET) until a pre-marked point indicating that the BB was just protruding from the ET tip. To identify the carinal depth without FOB, the BB balloon was inflated and advanced toward the intended side whilst monitoring abrupt changes in peak inspiratory pressure and expiratory tidal volume to indicate placement at the carina. In one-stage maneuver, the BB balloon was deflated and advanced 3 cm further from the estimated carinal depth. During the two-stage maneuver, the same procedure was performed to determine the carinal depth, and the deflated BB was withdrawn and reinserted to a predetermined depth with its tip directed 90 degree toward the target bronchus. The accuracy of BB positioning for both maneuvers was evaluated by a 4-point scale, with grades 1 and 2 considered acceptable for providing OLV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BB placement was more accurate in the two-stage maneuver than in the one-stage maneuver [88.0% (81/92) vs. 73.9% (68/92), relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]), 0.45 (0.23-0.88), P < 0.001]. This improvement was particularly significant when targeting the left main bronchus [84.8% (39/46) vs. 58.7% (27/46), relative risk (95% CI), 0.36 (0.17-0.79), P < 0.001)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel two-stage maneuver significantly improved the success rate of blindly positioning the BB.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02981537) on December 05, 2016.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715086/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-03276-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-03276-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:针对单肺通气(OLV),已经提出了几种盲目定位支气管阻滞剂(BBs)的方法。然而,这些方法不能可靠地保证准确的定位和正确的方向。在这里,我们开发了一种临床适用的两阶段操作方法,通过修改先前报道的一阶段操作方法,在需要肺隔离且不适用柔性支气管镜(FOB)的患者中,在适当的深度和方向成功插入BB。方法:这项前瞻性、随机、交叉研究在一家三级大学医院进行,纳入94例全麻下需要OLV进行择期胸外科手术的患者。比较两种方法的成功率,分别为一期术式和二期术式。气管插管后,将放气的硬角BB插入气管内管(ET),直到一个预先标记的点表明BB刚刚从ET尖端突出。为了确定无离合的隆突深度,将BB球囊充气并向指定的一侧推进,同时监测峰值吸气压力和呼气潮气量的突然变化,以指示隆突位置。在一期操作中,BB球囊放气,并从估计的隆突深度向前推进3cm。在两阶段操作中,采用相同的程序来确定隆突深度,取出放气的BB并重新插入到预定深度,其尖端指向目标支气管90度。两种机动的BB定位精度采用4分制进行评估,其中1级和2级被认为可以提供OLV。结果:两段手法比一期手法放置BB更准确[88.0%(81/92)比73.9%(68/92),相对危险度(95%置信区间[CI]) 0.45 (0.23-0.88), P]结论:新型两段手法明显提高了BB盲目定位的成功率。试验注册:本研究已于2016年12月5日在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02981537)注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A novel technique of blindly positioning bronchial blockers for one-lung ventilation: a prospective, randomized, crossover study.

Background: Several methods for blindly positioning bronchial blockers (BBs) for one-lung ventilation (OLV) have been proposed. However, these methods do not reliably ensure accurate positioning and proper direction. Here, we developed a clinically applicable two-stage maneuver by modifying a previously reported one-stage maneuver for successful insertion of a BB at the appropriate depth and direction in patients requiring lung isolation where a flexible bronchoscope (FOB) is not applicable.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, crossover study was conducted at a tertiary university hospital and included 94 patients requiring OLV for elective thoracic surgery under general anesthesia. The patients underwent the one-stage maneuver followed by the two-stage maneuver and vice versa, and the success rates of the two methods were compared. After tracheal intubation, the deflated rigid-angle BB was inserted into the endotracheal tube (ET) until a pre-marked point indicating that the BB was just protruding from the ET tip. To identify the carinal depth without FOB, the BB balloon was inflated and advanced toward the intended side whilst monitoring abrupt changes in peak inspiratory pressure and expiratory tidal volume to indicate placement at the carina. In one-stage maneuver, the BB balloon was deflated and advanced 3 cm further from the estimated carinal depth. During the two-stage maneuver, the same procedure was performed to determine the carinal depth, and the deflated BB was withdrawn and reinserted to a predetermined depth with its tip directed 90 degree toward the target bronchus. The accuracy of BB positioning for both maneuvers was evaluated by a 4-point scale, with grades 1 and 2 considered acceptable for providing OLV.

Results: BB placement was more accurate in the two-stage maneuver than in the one-stage maneuver [88.0% (81/92) vs. 73.9% (68/92), relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]), 0.45 (0.23-0.88), P < 0.001]. This improvement was particularly significant when targeting the left main bronchus [84.8% (39/46) vs. 58.7% (27/46), relative risk (95% CI), 0.36 (0.17-0.79), P < 0.001)].

Conclusions: The novel two-stage maneuver significantly improved the success rate of blindly positioning the BB.

Trial registration: This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02981537) on December 05, 2016.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
286
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields. Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信