{"title":"评估下肢义肢窝内的界面压力:在翻转模拟器上的有限元和实验测量的比较。","authors":"Maïalen Matray, Xavier Bonnet, Pierre-Yves Rohan, Laurine Calistri, Hélène Pillet","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Improper socket fitting in lower-limb prostheses can lead to significant complications, including pain, skin lesions, and pressure ulcers. Current suspension and socket design practices rely predominantly on visual inspection of the residual limb and patient feedback. Monitoring stress distribution at the residual limb/socket interface offers a more objective approach. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) enables to estimate interface pressure distribution prior to manufacture to provide the orthoprosthetist with quantitative data during socket rectification and interface prosthetic components selection. However, although numerous FEA models are available, few have undergone rigorous validation against experimental pressure data. Indeed, limitations of commercial pressure sensors typically include cumbersomeness or imprecision, thereby hindering systematic measurements within the socket. In this study, we introduce a low-cost, accurate pressure sensing system integrated into 3D-printed sockets for FEA validation. The system is implemented on a roll-over simulator that uses a mock limb to mimic the interaction between a transtibial residual limb and socket during the unipodal stance phase. A FEA of the simulator was then conducted, and predicted interface pressures were compared to experimental measurements at seven discrete locations. The model demonstrated a high degree of sensitivity to the geometry of the mock limb; however, with an accurate shape description, it was able to predict pressure with an average absolute error of 12 kPa. This work advances the validation of residual limb FEA for estimating residual limb/socket interface pressures. It highlights the potential of FEA for designing data-driven sockets and ultimately improve the comfort of prosthesis users.</p>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"180 ","pages":"112513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating interface pressure in a lower-limb prosthetic socket: Comparison of FEM and experimental measurements on a roll-over simulator.\",\"authors\":\"Maïalen Matray, Xavier Bonnet, Pierre-Yves Rohan, Laurine Calistri, Hélène Pillet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Improper socket fitting in lower-limb prostheses can lead to significant complications, including pain, skin lesions, and pressure ulcers. Current suspension and socket design practices rely predominantly on visual inspection of the residual limb and patient feedback. Monitoring stress distribution at the residual limb/socket interface offers a more objective approach. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) enables to estimate interface pressure distribution prior to manufacture to provide the orthoprosthetist with quantitative data during socket rectification and interface prosthetic components selection. However, although numerous FEA models are available, few have undergone rigorous validation against experimental pressure data. Indeed, limitations of commercial pressure sensors typically include cumbersomeness or imprecision, thereby hindering systematic measurements within the socket. In this study, we introduce a low-cost, accurate pressure sensing system integrated into 3D-printed sockets for FEA validation. The system is implemented on a roll-over simulator that uses a mock limb to mimic the interaction between a transtibial residual limb and socket during the unipodal stance phase. A FEA of the simulator was then conducted, and predicted interface pressures were compared to experimental measurements at seven discrete locations. The model demonstrated a high degree of sensitivity to the geometry of the mock limb; however, with an accurate shape description, it was able to predict pressure with an average absolute error of 12 kPa. This work advances the validation of residual limb FEA for estimating residual limb/socket interface pressures. It highlights the potential of FEA for designing data-driven sockets and ultimately improve the comfort of prosthesis users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"180 \",\"pages\":\"112513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112513\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating interface pressure in a lower-limb prosthetic socket: Comparison of FEM and experimental measurements on a roll-over simulator.
Improper socket fitting in lower-limb prostheses can lead to significant complications, including pain, skin lesions, and pressure ulcers. Current suspension and socket design practices rely predominantly on visual inspection of the residual limb and patient feedback. Monitoring stress distribution at the residual limb/socket interface offers a more objective approach. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) enables to estimate interface pressure distribution prior to manufacture to provide the orthoprosthetist with quantitative data during socket rectification and interface prosthetic components selection. However, although numerous FEA models are available, few have undergone rigorous validation against experimental pressure data. Indeed, limitations of commercial pressure sensors typically include cumbersomeness or imprecision, thereby hindering systematic measurements within the socket. In this study, we introduce a low-cost, accurate pressure sensing system integrated into 3D-printed sockets for FEA validation. The system is implemented on a roll-over simulator that uses a mock limb to mimic the interaction between a transtibial residual limb and socket during the unipodal stance phase. A FEA of the simulator was then conducted, and predicted interface pressures were compared to experimental measurements at seven discrete locations. The model demonstrated a high degree of sensitivity to the geometry of the mock limb; however, with an accurate shape description, it was able to predict pressure with an average absolute error of 12 kPa. This work advances the validation of residual limb FEA for estimating residual limb/socket interface pressures. It highlights the potential of FEA for designing data-driven sockets and ultimately improve the comfort of prosthesis users.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.