根据医院或医疗经验因素评估晚期胆道癌化疗结果的异质性:JCOG1113的事后分析

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Koh Fukushi, Hiroshi Imaoka, Masafumi Ikeda, Junki Mizusawa, Chigusa Morizane, Takuji Okusaka, Satoshi Kobayashi, Naoki Sasahira, Satoshi Shimizu, Kentaro Yamazaki, Naohiro Okano, Haruo Miwa, Kazuo Hara, Sohei Satoi, Keiji Sano, Kenji Sakai, Rie Sugimoto, Kazuyoshi Nakamura, Takeshi Terashima, Masato Ozaka, Makoto Ueno
{"title":"根据医院或医疗经验因素评估晚期胆道癌化疗结果的异质性:JCOG1113的事后分析","authors":"Koh Fukushi, Hiroshi Imaoka, Masafumi Ikeda, Junki Mizusawa, Chigusa Morizane, Takuji Okusaka, Satoshi Kobayashi, Naoki Sasahira, Satoshi Shimizu, Kentaro Yamazaki, Naohiro Okano, Haruo Miwa, Kazuo Hara, Sohei Satoi, Keiji Sano, Kenji Sakai, Rie Sugimoto, Kazuyoshi Nakamura, Takeshi Terashima, Masato Ozaka, Makoto Ueno","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyae188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>JCOG1113 is a randomized phase III trial that showed non-inferiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 to gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Assessment of inter-institutional heterogeneity in chemotherapy contributes to confirm generalizability and reliability of the study itself. However, there have been no studies conducted to assess the heterogeneity among participating centers in randomized phase III trials for biliary tract cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The objective of this post-hoc analysis was to assess the inter-institutional heterogeneity in the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy in the JCOG1113 trial. The heterogeneity in the overall survival and progression-free survival was assessed according to three factors: hospital volume, experience in medical oncology and experience in biliary intervention. A total of 300 advanced biliary tract cancer patients were analyzed. There were no statistically significant trends observed between hospital volume, experience in medical oncology, or experience in biliary intervention and overall survival (hospital volume: adjusted trend P value = 0.6796; experience in medical oncology: adjusted trend P value = 0.4092; experience in biliary intervention: adjusted trend P value = 0.6112). Similarly, no statistically significant trends were observed between these factors and progression-free survival (hospital volume: adjusted trend P value = 0.3000; experience in medical oncology: adjusted trend P value = 0.1108; experience in biliary intervention: adjusted trend P value = 0.2898).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed no inter-institutional heterogeneity in the overall survival and progression-free survival in the JCOG1113 study population of advanced biliary tract cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of heterogeneity according to hospital or medical experience factors in outcomes of chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: a post-hoc analysis of JCOG1113.\",\"authors\":\"Koh Fukushi, Hiroshi Imaoka, Masafumi Ikeda, Junki Mizusawa, Chigusa Morizane, Takuji Okusaka, Satoshi Kobayashi, Naoki Sasahira, Satoshi Shimizu, Kentaro Yamazaki, Naohiro Okano, Haruo Miwa, Kazuo Hara, Sohei Satoi, Keiji Sano, Kenji Sakai, Rie Sugimoto, Kazuyoshi Nakamura, Takeshi Terashima, Masato Ozaka, Makoto Ueno\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jjco/hyae188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>JCOG1113 is a randomized phase III trial that showed non-inferiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 to gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Assessment of inter-institutional heterogeneity in chemotherapy contributes to confirm generalizability and reliability of the study itself. However, there have been no studies conducted to assess the heterogeneity among participating centers in randomized phase III trials for biliary tract cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The objective of this post-hoc analysis was to assess the inter-institutional heterogeneity in the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy in the JCOG1113 trial. The heterogeneity in the overall survival and progression-free survival was assessed according to three factors: hospital volume, experience in medical oncology and experience in biliary intervention. A total of 300 advanced biliary tract cancer patients were analyzed. There were no statistically significant trends observed between hospital volume, experience in medical oncology, or experience in biliary intervention and overall survival (hospital volume: adjusted trend P value = 0.6796; experience in medical oncology: adjusted trend P value = 0.4092; experience in biliary intervention: adjusted trend P value = 0.6112). Similarly, no statistically significant trends were observed between these factors and progression-free survival (hospital volume: adjusted trend P value = 0.3000; experience in medical oncology: adjusted trend P value = 0.1108; experience in biliary intervention: adjusted trend P value = 0.2898).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed no inter-institutional heterogeneity in the overall survival and progression-free survival in the JCOG1113 study population of advanced biliary tract cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyae188\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyae188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:JCOG1113是一项随机III期试验,显示吉西他滨加S-1治疗晚期胆道癌患者比吉西他滨加顺铂治疗无劣效性。对化疗机构间异质性的评估有助于确认研究本身的普遍性和可靠性。然而,尚无研究评估胆道癌随机III期试验参与中心间的异质性。方法:本事后分析的目的是评估JCOG1113试验中接受一线化疗的晚期胆道癌患者总生存期和无进展生存期的机构间异质性。总生存期和无进展生存期的异质性根据三个因素进行评估:医院容量、内科肿瘤学经验和胆道干预经验。对300例晚期胆道肿瘤患者进行分析。住院人数、内科肿瘤学经验、胆道干预经验与总生存之间无统计学意义的变化趋势(住院人数:调整趋势P值= 0.6796;肿瘤内科经验:调整趋势P值= 0.4092;胆道干预经验:调整趋势P值= 0.6112)。同样,这些因素与无进展生存期之间也没有统计学上的显著趋势(医院容量:调整趋势P值= 0.3000;肿瘤内科经验:调整趋势P值= 0.1108;胆道干预经验:调整趋势P值= 0.2898)。结论:本研究显示JCOG1113研究人群中晚期胆道癌患者的总生存期和无进展生存期没有机构间异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of heterogeneity according to hospital or medical experience factors in outcomes of chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: a post-hoc analysis of JCOG1113.

Background: JCOG1113 is a randomized phase III trial that showed non-inferiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 to gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Assessment of inter-institutional heterogeneity in chemotherapy contributes to confirm generalizability and reliability of the study itself. However, there have been no studies conducted to assess the heterogeneity among participating centers in randomized phase III trials for biliary tract cancer.

Methods: The objective of this post-hoc analysis was to assess the inter-institutional heterogeneity in the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy in the JCOG1113 trial. The heterogeneity in the overall survival and progression-free survival was assessed according to three factors: hospital volume, experience in medical oncology and experience in biliary intervention. A total of 300 advanced biliary tract cancer patients were analyzed. There were no statistically significant trends observed between hospital volume, experience in medical oncology, or experience in biliary intervention and overall survival (hospital volume: adjusted trend P value = 0.6796; experience in medical oncology: adjusted trend P value = 0.4092; experience in biliary intervention: adjusted trend P value = 0.6112). Similarly, no statistically significant trends were observed between these factors and progression-free survival (hospital volume: adjusted trend P value = 0.3000; experience in medical oncology: adjusted trend P value = 0.1108; experience in biliary intervention: adjusted trend P value = 0.2898).

Conclusions: This study revealed no inter-institutional heterogeneity in the overall survival and progression-free survival in the JCOG1113 study population of advanced biliary tract cancer patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信