机器人辅助输尿管重建治疗肾移植患者输尿管并发症。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Dongho Shin, San Kang, Seung Ah Rhew, Chang Eil Yoon, Hyong Woo Moon, Yong Hyun Park, Hyuk Jin Cho
{"title":"机器人辅助输尿管重建治疗肾移植患者输尿管并发症。","authors":"Dongho Shin, San Kang, Seung Ah Rhew, Chang Eil Yoon, Hyong Woo Moon, Yong Hyun Park, Hyuk Jin Cho","doi":"10.4111/icu.20240308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery for managing ureteric complications in transplanted kidneys.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From January 2020 to December 2023, robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction was performed on fifteen kidney transplant patients with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) or ureteral stricture who had previously failed endoscopic treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve females and three males, with a mean age of 48.6±6.6 years, were included in the study. Nine patients (60.0%) underwent surgery due to VUR (grade III or higher) of the transplanted kidney, and six patients (40.0%) had transplanted ureteral strictures. Postoperative voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) was performed at 3.2±1.6 months. Seven patients (77.8%) became VUR-free, while two patients (22.2%) had VUR regression from grade IV to I. All six patients who underwent reconstruction due to anastomosis site stricture became stenosis-free without the need for an indwelling ureteral catheter. In cases where the ureter was too short for reimplantation, a Boari flap or end-to-end anastomosis with the native ureter was performed. The mean hospital stay was 5.9±4.5 days. The urethral catheter was removed after 15.1±5.4 days, and the ureteral catheter was removed after 4.9±1.5 weeks. The mean follow-up period was 23.9±6.8 months, with no additional interventions required after surgery. No complications above Clavien-Dindo grade I were recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic ureteral reconstruction is technically feasible and offers an effective, minimally invasive treatment for ureteric complications in kidney transplant patients, serving as an alternative to open surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":14522,"journal":{"name":"Investigative and Clinical Urology","volume":"66 1","pages":"18-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction for managing kidney transplant patients with ureteric complications.\",\"authors\":\"Dongho Shin, San Kang, Seung Ah Rhew, Chang Eil Yoon, Hyong Woo Moon, Yong Hyun Park, Hyuk Jin Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.4111/icu.20240308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery for managing ureteric complications in transplanted kidneys.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From January 2020 to December 2023, robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction was performed on fifteen kidney transplant patients with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) or ureteral stricture who had previously failed endoscopic treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve females and three males, with a mean age of 48.6±6.6 years, were included in the study. Nine patients (60.0%) underwent surgery due to VUR (grade III or higher) of the transplanted kidney, and six patients (40.0%) had transplanted ureteral strictures. Postoperative voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) was performed at 3.2±1.6 months. Seven patients (77.8%) became VUR-free, while two patients (22.2%) had VUR regression from grade IV to I. All six patients who underwent reconstruction due to anastomosis site stricture became stenosis-free without the need for an indwelling ureteral catheter. In cases where the ureter was too short for reimplantation, a Boari flap or end-to-end anastomosis with the native ureter was performed. The mean hospital stay was 5.9±4.5 days. The urethral catheter was removed after 15.1±5.4 days, and the ureteral catheter was removed after 4.9±1.5 weeks. The mean follow-up period was 23.9±6.8 months, with no additional interventions required after surgery. No complications above Clavien-Dindo grade I were recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic ureteral reconstruction is technically feasible and offers an effective, minimally invasive treatment for ureteric complications in kidney transplant patients, serving as an alternative to open surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative and Clinical Urology\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"18-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729223/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative and Clinical Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20240308\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative and Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20240308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估机器人辅助输尿管重建术作为一种微创替代开放手术治疗移植肾输尿管并发症的可行性。材料与方法:2020年1月至2023年12月,对15例既往内镜治疗失败的膀胱输尿管反流(VUR)或输尿管狭窄肾移植患者进行机器人辅助输尿管重建。结果:女性12例,男性3例,平均年龄48.6±6.6岁。9例(60.0%)患者因移植肾VUR (III级及以上)接受手术,6例(40.0%)患者因移植输尿管狭窄。术后3.2±1.6个月行膀胱输尿管造影(VCUG)。7例(77.8%)患者无VUR, 2例(22.2%)患者VUR从IV级降至i级。6例因吻合口狭窄进行重建的患者均无狭窄,无需留置输尿管导管。对于输尿管太短而不能再植入术的病例,采用Boari皮瓣或端到端与原输尿管吻合。平均住院时间5.9±4.5天。术后15.1±5.4天拔除导尿管,4.9±1.5周拔除输尿管导尿管。平均随访时间为23.9±6.8个月,术后无需额外干预。Clavien-Dindo I级以上无并发症记录。结论:机器人输尿管重建术在技术上是可行的,为肾移植患者输尿管并发症提供了一种有效的微创治疗方法,可作为开放手术的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction for managing kidney transplant patients with ureteric complications.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery for managing ureteric complications in transplanted kidneys.

Materials and methods: From January 2020 to December 2023, robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction was performed on fifteen kidney transplant patients with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) or ureteral stricture who had previously failed endoscopic treatments.

Results: Twelve females and three males, with a mean age of 48.6±6.6 years, were included in the study. Nine patients (60.0%) underwent surgery due to VUR (grade III or higher) of the transplanted kidney, and six patients (40.0%) had transplanted ureteral strictures. Postoperative voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) was performed at 3.2±1.6 months. Seven patients (77.8%) became VUR-free, while two patients (22.2%) had VUR regression from grade IV to I. All six patients who underwent reconstruction due to anastomosis site stricture became stenosis-free without the need for an indwelling ureteral catheter. In cases where the ureter was too short for reimplantation, a Boari flap or end-to-end anastomosis with the native ureter was performed. The mean hospital stay was 5.9±4.5 days. The urethral catheter was removed after 15.1±5.4 days, and the ureteral catheter was removed after 4.9±1.5 weeks. The mean follow-up period was 23.9±6.8 months, with no additional interventions required after surgery. No complications above Clavien-Dindo grade I were recorded.

Conclusions: Robotic ureteral reconstruction is technically feasible and offers an effective, minimally invasive treatment for ureteric complications in kidney transplant patients, serving as an alternative to open surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative and Clinical Urology (Investig Clin Urol, ICUrology) is an international, peer-reviewed, platinum open access journal published bimonthly. ICUrology aims to provide outstanding scientific and clinical research articles, that will advance knowledge and understanding of urological diseases and current therapeutic treatments. ICUrology publishes Original Articles, Rapid Communications, Review Articles, Special Articles, Innovations in Urology, Editorials, and Letters to the Editor, with a focus on the following areas of expertise: • Precision Medicine in Urology • Urological Oncology • Robotics/Laparoscopy • Endourology/Urolithiasis • Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction • Female Urology • Sexual Dysfunction/Infertility • Infection/Inflammation • Reconstruction/Transplantation • Geriatric Urology • Pediatric Urology • Basic/Translational Research One of the notable features of ICUrology is the application of multimedia platforms facilitating easy-to-access online video clips of newly developed surgical techniques from the journal''s website, by a QR (quick response) code located in the article, or via YouTube. ICUrology provides current and highly relevant knowledge to a broad audience at the cutting edge of urological research and clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信