利用近红外光谱测定休闲耐力和综合健身运动员的通气阈值。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Janik Arnet, Raphael Knaier, Raphael Schoch, Gommaar D'Hulst, Fabienne Bruggisser, Andri Feldmann, Rahel Leuenberger, Elena Westerhuis, Denis Infanger, Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss, Jonathan Wagner
{"title":"利用近红外光谱测定休闲耐力和综合健身运动员的通气阈值。","authors":"Janik Arnet, Raphael Knaier, Raphael Schoch, Gommaar D'Hulst, Fabienne Bruggisser, Andri Feldmann, Rahel Leuenberger, Elena Westerhuis, Denis Infanger, Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss, Jonathan Wagner","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2024-0265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To define training zones, ventilatory thresholds (VTs) are commonly established by cardiopulmonary gas-exchange analysis during incremental exercise tests. Portable near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) devices have emerged as a potential tool for detecting these thresholds by monitoring muscle oxygenation. This study evaluated the accuracy of NIRS measurements to determine VTs or critical power (CP) based on muscle oxygen saturation and assesses the device's consistency across 2 constant-load tests. Data from 2 cross-sectional studies involving trained recreational endurance athletes (26 from study 1) and CrossFit athletes (59 from study 2) were examined. Incremental ramp tests on a cycle ergometer were performed and followed by either a constant-load test (study 1) or a CP test (study 2). When comparing power output or heart rate between NIRS-derived breakpoints and VTs, weak to moderate agreement was found. Mean differences in power output and heart rate ranged from 16.8 to 22.4 W and 3.8 to 6.0 beats·min-1 at the first threshold and 27.4 to 31.2 W and 7.1 to 7.8 beats·min-1 at the second threshold. Comparing with CP, mean differences ranged from -0.4 to 0.4 W and -0.6 to 0.9 beats·min-1. Test-retest reliability showed moderate agreement, with a mean bias of 1.2 percentage points between constant-load tests. Thus, NIRS may not be accurate for determining VTs or CP during exercise due to limited agreement in power output or hear rate, notable variability on individual level, and moderate reproducibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":" ","pages":"345-354"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Ventilatory Thresholds Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Recreational Endurance and CrossFit Athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Janik Arnet, Raphael Knaier, Raphael Schoch, Gommaar D'Hulst, Fabienne Bruggisser, Andri Feldmann, Rahel Leuenberger, Elena Westerhuis, Denis Infanger, Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss, Jonathan Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/ijspp.2024-0265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To define training zones, ventilatory thresholds (VTs) are commonly established by cardiopulmonary gas-exchange analysis during incremental exercise tests. Portable near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) devices have emerged as a potential tool for detecting these thresholds by monitoring muscle oxygenation. This study evaluated the accuracy of NIRS measurements to determine VTs or critical power (CP) based on muscle oxygen saturation and assesses the device's consistency across 2 constant-load tests. Data from 2 cross-sectional studies involving trained recreational endurance athletes (26 from study 1) and CrossFit athletes (59 from study 2) were examined. Incremental ramp tests on a cycle ergometer were performed and followed by either a constant-load test (study 1) or a CP test (study 2). When comparing power output or heart rate between NIRS-derived breakpoints and VTs, weak to moderate agreement was found. Mean differences in power output and heart rate ranged from 16.8 to 22.4 W and 3.8 to 6.0 beats·min-1 at the first threshold and 27.4 to 31.2 W and 7.1 to 7.8 beats·min-1 at the second threshold. Comparing with CP, mean differences ranged from -0.4 to 0.4 W and -0.6 to 0.9 beats·min-1. Test-retest reliability showed moderate agreement, with a mean bias of 1.2 percentage points between constant-load tests. Thus, NIRS may not be accurate for determining VTs or CP during exercise due to limited agreement in power output or hear rate, notable variability on individual level, and moderate reproducibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of sports physiology and performance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"345-354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of sports physiology and performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0265\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了确定训练区域,通气量阈值(vt)通常是在增量运动试验中通过心肺气体交换分析确定的。便携式近红外光谱(NIRS)设备已经成为通过监测肌肉氧合来检测这些阈值的潜在工具。本研究评估了NIRS测量的准确性,以确定基于肌肉氧饱和度的vt或临界功率(CP),并评估了该设备在2个恒定负载测试中的一致性。研究人员对两项横断面研究的数据进行了分析,其中包括训练有素的休闲耐力运动员(研究1中的26人)和混合健身运动员(研究2中的59人)。在循环测力仪上进行增量斜坡试验,随后进行恒定负荷试验(研究1)或CP试验(研究2)。当比较nirs衍生的断点和VTs之间的功率输出或心率时,发现了弱至中度的一致性。在第一个阈值下,功率输出和心率的平均差异为16.8 ~ 22.4 W和3.8 ~ 6.0次·min-1;在第二个阈值下,功率输出和心率的平均差异为27.4 ~ 31.2 W和7.1 ~ 7.8次·min-1。与CP相比,平均差异为-0.4 ~ 0.4 W和-0.6 ~ 0.9次·min-1。测试-重测信度显示出适度的一致性,在恒定负载测试之间的平均偏差为1.2个百分点。因此,近红外光谱(NIRS)可能不能准确地确定运动过程中的vt或CP,因为在功率输出或心率方面的一致性有限,个人水平上存在显著的可变性,而且重复性不高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of Ventilatory Thresholds Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Recreational Endurance and CrossFit Athletes.

To define training zones, ventilatory thresholds (VTs) are commonly established by cardiopulmonary gas-exchange analysis during incremental exercise tests. Portable near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) devices have emerged as a potential tool for detecting these thresholds by monitoring muscle oxygenation. This study evaluated the accuracy of NIRS measurements to determine VTs or critical power (CP) based on muscle oxygen saturation and assesses the device's consistency across 2 constant-load tests. Data from 2 cross-sectional studies involving trained recreational endurance athletes (26 from study 1) and CrossFit athletes (59 from study 2) were examined. Incremental ramp tests on a cycle ergometer were performed and followed by either a constant-load test (study 1) or a CP test (study 2). When comparing power output or heart rate between NIRS-derived breakpoints and VTs, weak to moderate agreement was found. Mean differences in power output and heart rate ranged from 16.8 to 22.4 W and 3.8 to 6.0 beats·min-1 at the first threshold and 27.4 to 31.2 W and 7.1 to 7.8 beats·min-1 at the second threshold. Comparing with CP, mean differences ranged from -0.4 to 0.4 W and -0.6 to 0.9 beats·min-1. Test-retest reliability showed moderate agreement, with a mean bias of 1.2 percentage points between constant-load tests. Thus, NIRS may not be accurate for determining VTs or CP during exercise due to limited agreement in power output or hear rate, notable variability on individual level, and moderate reproducibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
199
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信