{"title":"重要牙髓治疗的临床实践指南和立场声明的质量评估：系统回顾。","authors":"Akshat Sachdeva, Vishal Kumar, Amrita Chawla, Harsh Priya, Vijay Kumar, Sidhartha Sharma, Ajay Logani","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01104-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate different Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and Position Statements (PS) on Vital Pulp Therapy (VPT) using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-Recommendation EXcellence (AGREE-REX) tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two authors performed the initial search using a set of keywords in six databases. Only CPGs and PS on VPT published during the past five years were included. The included CPGs were appraised independently by six appraisers. AGREE II tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality, and AGREE REX was used to evaluate the quality of recommendations. Intraclass correlation coefficient was used as a reliability indicator among assessors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four published CPGs were shortlisted. Guidelines established by the European Society of Endodontology (ESE, 2019), German Society of Endodontology and Dental Traumatology (GSEDT, 2019), American Association of Endodontists (AAE, 2021), and Australian Dental Association (ADA, 2021) were analyzed. The ESE PS obtained the highest average score overall.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Endodontists must adhere to clinical practice guidelines established by specialty associations or societies. Improving the domains \"Rigour of Development\" and \"Applicability\" is necessary to enhance the overall strength of the guidelines. It is imperative to prevent discouragement and confusion among practitioners regarding VPT procedures by ensuring cohesiveness among various endodontic associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This assessment aids in determining the standard of CPGs among different specialized societies and associations. It also highlights the essential future actions and initiatives needed to establish robust evidence-based standards on VPT.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The protocol of this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023429673).</p>","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines and position statements on vital pulp therapy: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Akshat Sachdeva, Vishal Kumar, Amrita Chawla, Harsh Priya, Vijay Kumar, Sidhartha Sharma, Ajay Logani\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41432-024-01104-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate different Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and Position Statements (PS) on Vital Pulp Therapy (VPT) using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-Recommendation EXcellence (AGREE-REX) tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two authors performed the initial search using a set of keywords in six databases. Only CPGs and PS on VPT published during the past five years were included. The included CPGs were appraised independently by six appraisers. AGREE II tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality, and AGREE REX was used to evaluate the quality of recommendations. Intraclass correlation coefficient was used as a reliability indicator among assessors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four published CPGs were shortlisted. Guidelines established by the European Society of Endodontology (ESE, 2019), German Society of Endodontology and Dental Traumatology (GSEDT, 2019), American Association of Endodontists (AAE, 2021), and Australian Dental Association (ADA, 2021) were analyzed. The ESE PS obtained the highest average score overall.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Endodontists must adhere to clinical practice guidelines established by specialty associations or societies. Improving the domains \\\"Rigour of Development\\\" and \\\"Applicability\\\" is necessary to enhance the overall strength of the guidelines. It is imperative to prevent discouragement and confusion among practitioners regarding VPT procedures by ensuring cohesiveness among various endodontic associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This assessment aids in determining the standard of CPGs among different specialized societies and associations. It also highlights the essential future actions and initiatives needed to establish robust evidence-based standards on VPT.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The protocol of this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023429673).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01104-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01104-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines and position statements on vital pulp therapy: a systematic review.
Objective: To evaluate different Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and Position Statements (PS) on Vital Pulp Therapy (VPT) using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-Recommendation EXcellence (AGREE-REX) tools.
Methods: Two authors performed the initial search using a set of keywords in six databases. Only CPGs and PS on VPT published during the past five years were included. The included CPGs were appraised independently by six appraisers. AGREE II tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality, and AGREE REX was used to evaluate the quality of recommendations. Intraclass correlation coefficient was used as a reliability indicator among assessors.
Results: Four published CPGs were shortlisted. Guidelines established by the European Society of Endodontology (ESE, 2019), German Society of Endodontology and Dental Traumatology (GSEDT, 2019), American Association of Endodontists (AAE, 2021), and Australian Dental Association (ADA, 2021) were analyzed. The ESE PS obtained the highest average score overall.
Discussion: Endodontists must adhere to clinical practice guidelines established by specialty associations or societies. Improving the domains "Rigour of Development" and "Applicability" is necessary to enhance the overall strength of the guidelines. It is imperative to prevent discouragement and confusion among practitioners regarding VPT procedures by ensuring cohesiveness among various endodontic associations.
Conclusion: This assessment aids in determining the standard of CPGs among different specialized societies and associations. It also highlights the essential future actions and initiatives needed to establish robust evidence-based standards on VPT.
Registration: The protocol of this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023429673).
期刊介绍：
Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
