慢性疼痛背景下心理灵活性的全面有效评估。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Amani Lavefjord, Felicia T. A. Sundström, Dane Chia, Fara Tabrizi, Monica Buhrman, Lance M. McCracken
{"title":"慢性疼痛背景下心理灵活性的全面有效评估。","authors":"Amani Lavefjord,&nbsp;Felicia T. A. Sundström,&nbsp;Dane Chia,&nbsp;Fara Tabrizi,&nbsp;Monica Buhrman,&nbsp;Lance M. McCracken","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI) is a measure of all facets of psychological flexibility and inflexibility, potentially important processes of change in psychological treatment for chronic pain. In some contexts, it can be considered too long. The aim of this study was, therefore, to validate a short form MPFI (MPFI-24P) in a chronic pain sample.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Adults with chronic pain were recruited online (<i>N</i> = 404) for a cross-sectional survey study. They first completed pain background questions and the MPFI. For examining convergent construct validity and explained variance in pain-related outcomes, participants also completed the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference Scale, the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a depression measure. Data were collected on two occasions, 2 weeks apart. Item response theory (IRT) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used for selecting the best-performing items.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>IRT parameters were overall adequate, and hierarchical CFA demonstrated a good model fit. Network analysis of the MPFI items indicated that, in general, items intended to measure the same facets were substantially interconnected, more so for the inflexibility items. Temporal stability was adequate, and internal consistency was good. The MPFI-24P correlated with pain interference, work and social adjustment and depression, with the inflexibility scale better predicting these outcomes. The MPFI-24P correlated strongly with the full-length MPFI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The MPFI-24P for chronic pain is generally valid and reliable, especially the inflexibility scale. It performs similarly to the full-length MPFI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>This paper contributes with a measure that is both feasible to use in clinical practice and research, while being able to measure all facets of psychological flexibility and inflexibility—psychological processes of change that are important to evaluate in psychological treatment of chronic pain in order to better individualize treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive and Efficient Assessment of Psychological Flexibility in the Context of Chronic Pain\",\"authors\":\"Amani Lavefjord,&nbsp;Felicia T. A. Sundström,&nbsp;Dane Chia,&nbsp;Fara Tabrizi,&nbsp;Monica Buhrman,&nbsp;Lance M. McCracken\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejp.4781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI) is a measure of all facets of psychological flexibility and inflexibility, potentially important processes of change in psychological treatment for chronic pain. In some contexts, it can be considered too long. The aim of this study was, therefore, to validate a short form MPFI (MPFI-24P) in a chronic pain sample.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adults with chronic pain were recruited online (<i>N</i> = 404) for a cross-sectional survey study. They first completed pain background questions and the MPFI. For examining convergent construct validity and explained variance in pain-related outcomes, participants also completed the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference Scale, the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a depression measure. Data were collected on two occasions, 2 weeks apart. Item response theory (IRT) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used for selecting the best-performing items.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>IRT parameters were overall adequate, and hierarchical CFA demonstrated a good model fit. Network analysis of the MPFI items indicated that, in general, items intended to measure the same facets were substantially interconnected, more so for the inflexibility items. Temporal stability was adequate, and internal consistency was good. The MPFI-24P correlated with pain interference, work and social adjustment and depression, with the inflexibility scale better predicting these outcomes. The MPFI-24P correlated strongly with the full-length MPFI.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The MPFI-24P for chronic pain is generally valid and reliable, especially the inflexibility scale. It performs similarly to the full-length MPFI.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>This paper contributes with a measure that is both feasible to use in clinical practice and research, while being able to measure all facets of psychological flexibility and inflexibility—psychological processes of change that are important to evaluate in psychological treatment of chronic pain in order to better individualize treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704060/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.4781\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.4781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多维心理灵活性量表(MPFI)是衡量心理灵活性和不灵活性的所有方面,这是慢性疼痛心理治疗变化的潜在重要过程。在某些情况下,它可能被认为太长了。因此,本研究的目的是在慢性疼痛样本中验证MPFI的简短形式(MPFI- 24p)。方法:在线招募患有慢性疼痛的成人(N = 404)进行横断面调查研究。他们首先完成疼痛背景问题和MPFI。为了检验聚合结构效度和解释疼痛相关结果的差异,参与者还完成了简短疼痛量表(BPI)疼痛干扰量表、工作和社会适应量表(WSAS)和患者健康问卷(PHQ-9),这是一种抑郁测量。数据收集两次,间隔2周。采用项目反应理论(IRT)和验证性因子分析(CFA)来选择表现最佳的项目。结果:IRT参数总体上是足够的,分层CFA显示了良好的模型拟合。MPFI项目的网络分析表明,一般来说,用于测量相同方面的项目基本上是相互关联的,对于不灵活性项目更是如此。时间稳定性足够,内部一致性良好。MPFI-24P与疼痛干扰、工作与社会适应和抑郁相关,而僵化程度量表能更好地预测这些结果。MPFI- 24p与全长MPFI相关性强。结论:MPFI-24P对慢性疼痛的诊断总体上是有效和可靠的,尤其是不灵活性量表。它的性能类似于全长MPFI。意义:本研究提供了一种既可用于临床实践和研究的测量方法,同时又能测量心理弹性和非弹性的各个方面,这是评估慢性疼痛心理治疗中重要的心理变化过程,从而更好地进行个性化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comprehensive and Efficient Assessment of Psychological Flexibility in the Context of Chronic Pain

Comprehensive and Efficient Assessment of Psychological Flexibility in the Context of Chronic Pain

Background

The Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI) is a measure of all facets of psychological flexibility and inflexibility, potentially important processes of change in psychological treatment for chronic pain. In some contexts, it can be considered too long. The aim of this study was, therefore, to validate a short form MPFI (MPFI-24P) in a chronic pain sample.

Methods

Adults with chronic pain were recruited online (N = 404) for a cross-sectional survey study. They first completed pain background questions and the MPFI. For examining convergent construct validity and explained variance in pain-related outcomes, participants also completed the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference Scale, the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a depression measure. Data were collected on two occasions, 2 weeks apart. Item response theory (IRT) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used for selecting the best-performing items.

Results

IRT parameters were overall adequate, and hierarchical CFA demonstrated a good model fit. Network analysis of the MPFI items indicated that, in general, items intended to measure the same facets were substantially interconnected, more so for the inflexibility items. Temporal stability was adequate, and internal consistency was good. The MPFI-24P correlated with pain interference, work and social adjustment and depression, with the inflexibility scale better predicting these outcomes. The MPFI-24P correlated strongly with the full-length MPFI.

Conclusions

The MPFI-24P for chronic pain is generally valid and reliable, especially the inflexibility scale. It performs similarly to the full-length MPFI.

Significance

This paper contributes with a measure that is both feasible to use in clinical practice and research, while being able to measure all facets of psychological flexibility and inflexibility—psychological processes of change that are important to evaluate in psychological treatment of chronic pain in order to better individualize treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信