经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,控制低密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低由脂蛋白升高介导的心血管风险(a)。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ahmed K Mahmoud, Kamal Awad, Juan M Farina, Mohammed Tiseer Abbas, Nima Baba Ali, Hesham M Abdalla, Amro Badr, Muhammad A Elahi, Milagros Pereyra, Isabel G Scalia, Niloofar Javadi, Nadera N Bismee, Said Alsidawi, Steven J Lester, Chadi Ayoub, Reza Arsanjani
{"title":"经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,控制低密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低由脂蛋白升高介导的心血管风险(a)。","authors":"Ahmed K Mahmoud, Kamal Awad, Juan M Farina, Mohammed Tiseer Abbas, Nima Baba Ali, Hesham M Abdalla, Amro Badr, Muhammad A Elahi, Milagros Pereyra, Isabel G Scalia, Niloofar Javadi, Nadera N Bismee, Said Alsidawi, Steven J Lester, Chadi Ayoub, Reza Arsanjani","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent, causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, it is still unclear whether controlling low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to optimal levels can attenuate cardiovascular risk mediated by elevated Lp(a), especially in the setting of secondary prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with a baseline Lp(a) measurement who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and reached their LDL-C target levels (<70 mg/dl) at Mayo Clinic sites between 2006 and 2017 were included. Primary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to compare the survival probabilities among patients with Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl compared with Lp(a) < 50 mg/dl. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to quantify the association of elevated Lp(a) with our relevant outcomes and to control for possible confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 878 patients (median age: 68 years, and 74% males) who underwent PCI were included for analysis. Of them, 29.7% had elevated Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl. Kaplan-Meier curves did not reveal any significant difference in survival probabilities for elevated Lp(a) for any outcome including MACE (P = 0.91), all-cause mortality (P = 0.26), or the separate MACE components. Similarly, the multivariable analysis showed no significant association for MACE (hazard ratio: 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.37) or all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.30).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients who underwent PCI and have their LDL-C controlled below 70 mg/dl, no significant association was found between elevated Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl and risk for MACE or all-cause mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol attenuates cardiovascular risk mediated by elevated lipoprotein(a) after percutaneous coronary intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed K Mahmoud, Kamal Awad, Juan M Farina, Mohammed Tiseer Abbas, Nima Baba Ali, Hesham M Abdalla, Amro Badr, Muhammad A Elahi, Milagros Pereyra, Isabel G Scalia, Niloofar Javadi, Nadera N Bismee, Said Alsidawi, Steven J Lester, Chadi Ayoub, Reza Arsanjani\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent, causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, it is still unclear whether controlling low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to optimal levels can attenuate cardiovascular risk mediated by elevated Lp(a), especially in the setting of secondary prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with a baseline Lp(a) measurement who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and reached their LDL-C target levels (<70 mg/dl) at Mayo Clinic sites between 2006 and 2017 were included. Primary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to compare the survival probabilities among patients with Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl compared with Lp(a) < 50 mg/dl. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to quantify the association of elevated Lp(a) with our relevant outcomes and to control for possible confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 878 patients (median age: 68 years, and 74% males) who underwent PCI were included for analysis. Of them, 29.7% had elevated Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl. Kaplan-Meier curves did not reveal any significant difference in survival probabilities for elevated Lp(a) for any outcome including MACE (P = 0.91), all-cause mortality (P = 0.26), or the separate MACE components. Similarly, the multivariable analysis showed no significant association for MACE (hazard ratio: 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.37) or all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.30).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients who underwent PCI and have their LDL-C controlled below 70 mg/dl, no significant association was found between elevated Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl and risk for MACE or all-cause mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001460\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脂蛋白(a) [Lp(a)]是心血管疾病的独立、因果危险因素。然而,目前尚不清楚控制低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)至最佳水平是否可以降低Lp(a)升高介导的心血管风险,特别是在二级预防的情况下。方法:基线Lp(a)测量并接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)并达到LDL-C目标水平的成年患者(结果:共纳入878例接受PCI治疗的患者(中位年龄:68岁,男性占74%)进行分析。其中29.7%的患者Lp(a)升高≥50 mg/dl。Kaplan-Meier曲线未显示任何结果(包括MACE (P = 0.91)、全因死亡率(P = 0.26)或单独的MACE成分)的Lp(a)升高的生存概率有任何显著差异。同样,多变量分析显示MACE(风险比:1.07,95%置信区间:0.84-1.37)或全因死亡率(风险比:0.98,95%置信区间:0.74-1.30)无显著相关性。结论:在接受PCI且LDL-C控制在70 mg/dl以下的患者中,升高的Lp(a)≥50 mg/dl与MACE或全因死亡风险之间没有显著关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol attenuates cardiovascular risk mediated by elevated lipoprotein(a) after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent, causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, it is still unclear whether controlling low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to optimal levels can attenuate cardiovascular risk mediated by elevated Lp(a), especially in the setting of secondary prevention.

Methods: Adult patients with a baseline Lp(a) measurement who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and reached their LDL-C target levels (<70 mg/dl) at Mayo Clinic sites between 2006 and 2017 were included. Primary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to compare the survival probabilities among patients with Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl compared with Lp(a) < 50 mg/dl. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to quantify the association of elevated Lp(a) with our relevant outcomes and to control for possible confounders.

Results: In total, 878 patients (median age: 68 years, and 74% males) who underwent PCI were included for analysis. Of them, 29.7% had elevated Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl. Kaplan-Meier curves did not reveal any significant difference in survival probabilities for elevated Lp(a) for any outcome including MACE (P = 0.91), all-cause mortality (P = 0.26), or the separate MACE components. Similarly, the multivariable analysis showed no significant association for MACE (hazard ratio: 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.37) or all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.30).

Conclusion: In patients who underwent PCI and have their LDL-C controlled below 70 mg/dl, no significant association was found between elevated Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl and risk for MACE or all-cause mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coronary artery disease
Coronary artery disease 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management. Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and​ peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信