早期高危乳腺癌患者远程监测区域性辅助Abemaciclib服务的开发与评价

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Nicole L Brown, Ann Tivey, Suzanne Frank, Siow Chin Phua, Jack E Johnson, Anne Armstrong, Caroline Wilson, Sophie Raby, Sophie Low, Yvonne Hulmes, Fiona Britton, Sacha J Howell
{"title":"早期高危乳腺癌患者远程监测区域性辅助Abemaciclib服务的开发与评价","authors":"Nicole L Brown, Ann Tivey, Suzanne Frank, Siow Chin Phua, Jack E Johnson, Anne Armstrong, Caroline Wilson, Sophie Raby, Sophie Low, Yvonne Hulmes, Fiona Britton, Sacha J Howell","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adjuvant abemaciclib was recently approved in high-risk early breast cancer, leading to an increase in oncology resource utilisation. We thus developed a regional, remote monitoring clinical service. The set-up, delivery processes and outcomes from the first 6 months' consecutive patients are presented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A regional delivery model with remote monitoring using optional electronic patient outcome measures (ePROMs) and bloods closer to home (BCTH) was implemented. Electronic patient records of patients entering the service (October 31, 2022 to May 31, 2023) were reviewed. Time-in-motion and on-line patient satisfaction surveys were conducted with questions adapted from prior questionnaires used by our cancer center. An independent t-test was used to assess differences in creatinine levels whilst on abemaciclib and a Mann-Whitney test to determine whether the time taken to complete follow-up appointments differed with and without ePROMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first 103 patients to commence abemaciclib (median age 58 [range, 27-85], 66.0% White) had completed a median of 6 cycles (range, 0-9). 51.5% had treatment interruption, 52.4% a dose reduction and 15.5% discontinued therapy. Diarrhoea (90.3%), fatigue (84.9%) and anorexia (73.1%) were the most commonly reported toxicities on ePROMs. 10.8% of patients reported grade 3-4 toxicities. Neutropenia was also common and low grade. 89.5% of patients would recommend ePROMs and 98.0% found the BCTH service easy to use. Review appointments with ePROMs were a similar length to those without (P = .138).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have successfully implemented a remote, regional adjuvant clinical service which could serve as a blueprint for other NHS trusts for this and other cancer drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Evaluation of a Remote Monitoring Regional Adjuvant Abemaciclib Service for Patients With High-Risk Early Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole L Brown, Ann Tivey, Suzanne Frank, Siow Chin Phua, Jack E Johnson, Anne Armstrong, Caroline Wilson, Sophie Raby, Sophie Low, Yvonne Hulmes, Fiona Britton, Sacha J Howell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adjuvant abemaciclib was recently approved in high-risk early breast cancer, leading to an increase in oncology resource utilisation. We thus developed a regional, remote monitoring clinical service. The set-up, delivery processes and outcomes from the first 6 months' consecutive patients are presented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A regional delivery model with remote monitoring using optional electronic patient outcome measures (ePROMs) and bloods closer to home (BCTH) was implemented. Electronic patient records of patients entering the service (October 31, 2022 to May 31, 2023) were reviewed. Time-in-motion and on-line patient satisfaction surveys were conducted with questions adapted from prior questionnaires used by our cancer center. An independent t-test was used to assess differences in creatinine levels whilst on abemaciclib and a Mann-Whitney test to determine whether the time taken to complete follow-up appointments differed with and without ePROMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first 103 patients to commence abemaciclib (median age 58 [range, 27-85], 66.0% White) had completed a median of 6 cycles (range, 0-9). 51.5% had treatment interruption, 52.4% a dose reduction and 15.5% discontinued therapy. Diarrhoea (90.3%), fatigue (84.9%) and anorexia (73.1%) were the most commonly reported toxicities on ePROMs. 10.8% of patients reported grade 3-4 toxicities. Neutropenia was also common and low grade. 89.5% of patients would recommend ePROMs and 98.0% found the BCTH service easy to use. Review appointments with ePROMs were a similar length to those without (P = .138).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have successfully implemented a remote, regional adjuvant clinical service which could serve as a blueprint for other NHS trusts for this and other cancer drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.12.001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.12.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导语:佐剂abemaciclib最近被批准用于高危早期乳腺癌,导致肿瘤资源利用率的增加。因此,我们开发了一种区域性的远程监测临床服务。介绍了前6个月连续患者的设置、交付过程和结果。方法:采用可选的电子患者结局测量(ePROMs)和离家更近的血液(BCTH)进行远程监测的区域分娩模式。查看2022年10月31日至2023年5月31日入院患者电子病历。实时动态和在线患者满意度调查的问题改编自我们癌症中心以前使用的问卷。采用独立t检验评估使用abemaciclib时肌酐水平的差异,并采用Mann-Whitney检验确定在使用和不使用ePROMs时完成随访预约所需的时间是否不同。结果:首103例开始使用abemaciclib的患者(中位年龄58岁[范围27-85],白人占66.0%)完成了中位6个周期(范围0-9)。51.5%的患者中断治疗,52.4%的患者减少剂量,15.5%的患者停止治疗。腹泻(90.3%)、疲劳(84.9%)和厌食(73.1%)是eprom最常见的毒性反应。10.8%的患者报告3-4级毒性。中性粒细胞减少症也很常见,但程度较低。89.5%的患者会推荐eprom, 98.0%的患者认为BCTH服务易于使用。使用eprom的随访时间与不使用eprom的随访时间相似(P = .138)。结论:我们已经成功地实施了远程,区域辅助临床服务,这可以作为其他NHS信托机构的蓝图,用于这种和其他癌症药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Evaluation of a Remote Monitoring Regional Adjuvant Abemaciclib Service for Patients With High-Risk Early Breast Cancer.

Introduction: Adjuvant abemaciclib was recently approved in high-risk early breast cancer, leading to an increase in oncology resource utilisation. We thus developed a regional, remote monitoring clinical service. The set-up, delivery processes and outcomes from the first 6 months' consecutive patients are presented.

Methods: A regional delivery model with remote monitoring using optional electronic patient outcome measures (ePROMs) and bloods closer to home (BCTH) was implemented. Electronic patient records of patients entering the service (October 31, 2022 to May 31, 2023) were reviewed. Time-in-motion and on-line patient satisfaction surveys were conducted with questions adapted from prior questionnaires used by our cancer center. An independent t-test was used to assess differences in creatinine levels whilst on abemaciclib and a Mann-Whitney test to determine whether the time taken to complete follow-up appointments differed with and without ePROMs.

Results: The first 103 patients to commence abemaciclib (median age 58 [range, 27-85], 66.0% White) had completed a median of 6 cycles (range, 0-9). 51.5% had treatment interruption, 52.4% a dose reduction and 15.5% discontinued therapy. Diarrhoea (90.3%), fatigue (84.9%) and anorexia (73.1%) were the most commonly reported toxicities on ePROMs. 10.8% of patients reported grade 3-4 toxicities. Neutropenia was also common and low grade. 89.5% of patients would recommend ePROMs and 98.0% found the BCTH service easy to use. Review appointments with ePROMs were a similar length to those without (P = .138).

Conclusions: We have successfully implemented a remote, regional adjuvant clinical service which could serve as a blueprint for other NHS trusts for this and other cancer drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信