确定克罗恩病评估中四个超声评分的准确性和观察者之间的一致性:与内窥镜检查的相关性

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jing Qin, Li Ma, Meng-Yuan Zhou, Wen-Bo Li, Meng-Su Xiao, Zi-Han Niu, Hong Yang, Qing-Li Zhu
{"title":"确定克罗恩病评估中四个超声评分的准确性和观察者之间的一致性:与内窥镜检查的相关性","authors":"Jing Qin, Li Ma, Meng-Yuan Zhou, Wen-Bo Li, Meng-Su Xiao, Zi-Han Niu, Hong Yang, Qing-Li Zhu","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) is recommended for monitoring Crohn's disease (CD). GIUS scores are used to quantify CD activity. Among them, IBUS-SAS (International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score), BUSS (Bowel Ultrasound Score), Simple-US (Simple Ultrasound Score), and SUS-CD (Simple Ultrasound Score for Crohn's Disease) are most commonly used. This study aimed to compare and correlate the performance of such indicators with endoscopic activity and to calculate interobserver agreement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive CD patients at our hospital between June 2015 and July 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients underwent ileocolonoscopy after medical treatment. GIUS was performed within 2 weeks and four GIUS scores were independently calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to determine a cut-off value. Cohen's kappa(κ) coefficient was calculated to estimate the agreement between GIUS findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 CD patients were enrolled. 80.2% (85/106) were endoscopic active (SES-CD≥3), and 8.49% (9/106) were severe cases (SES-CD≥9). All GIUS features (bowel wall thickness, color doppler signs, bowel wall stratification, inflammatory signals at the mesentery) were statistically significant in assessing CD activity (p<0.05). IBUS-SAS showed the highest AUC (0.98; 95% CI:0.96-1.00) and specificity (95.2%) for a cut-off value of 46.50. However, IBUS-SAS had only moderate agreement (Cohen's κ=0.427; p<0.001). BUSS had substantial interobserver agreement (Cohen's κ=0.947; p< 0.001), with a similar diagnostic value [sensitivity, 100.0%; accuracy, 95.3%; AUC of 0.96(95% CI:0.91-1.00) for a cut-off value of 4.58].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GIUS score is an efficient and reliable method to assess CD activity. BUSS achieved a high accuracy and excellent interobserver agreement, which is more suitable for treatment assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining the accuracy and interobserver agreement of four ultrasound scores in Crohn's disease assessment: correlations with endoscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Jing Qin, Li Ma, Meng-Yuan Zhou, Wen-Bo Li, Meng-Su Xiao, Zi-Han Niu, Hong Yang, Qing-Li Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) is recommended for monitoring Crohn's disease (CD). GIUS scores are used to quantify CD activity. Among them, IBUS-SAS (International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score), BUSS (Bowel Ultrasound Score), Simple-US (Simple Ultrasound Score), and SUS-CD (Simple Ultrasound Score for Crohn's Disease) are most commonly used. This study aimed to compare and correlate the performance of such indicators with endoscopic activity and to calculate interobserver agreement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive CD patients at our hospital between June 2015 and July 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients underwent ileocolonoscopy after medical treatment. GIUS was performed within 2 weeks and four GIUS scores were independently calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to determine a cut-off value. Cohen's kappa(κ) coefficient was calculated to estimate the agreement between GIUS findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 CD patients were enrolled. 80.2% (85/106) were endoscopic active (SES-CD≥3), and 8.49% (9/106) were severe cases (SES-CD≥9). All GIUS features (bowel wall thickness, color doppler signs, bowel wall stratification, inflammatory signals at the mesentery) were statistically significant in assessing CD activity (p<0.05). IBUS-SAS showed the highest AUC (0.98; 95% CI:0.96-1.00) and specificity (95.2%) for a cut-off value of 46.50. However, IBUS-SAS had only moderate agreement (Cohen's κ=0.427; p<0.001). BUSS had substantial interobserver agreement (Cohen's κ=0.947; p< 0.001), with a similar diagnostic value [sensitivity, 100.0%; accuracy, 95.3%; AUC of 0.96(95% CI:0.91-1.00) for a cut-off value of 4.58].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GIUS score is an efficient and reliable method to assess CD activity. BUSS achieved a high accuracy and excellent interobserver agreement, which is more suitable for treatment assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000812\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000812","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胃肠超声(GIUS)被推荐用于克罗恩病(CD)的监测。GIUS评分用于量化CD活动。其中,最常用的是IBUS-SAS(国际肠超声节段活动评分)、BUSS(肠超声评分)、Simple- us(简单超声评分)和SUS-CD(克罗恩病简单超声评分)。本研究旨在比较和关联这些指标的性能与内窥镜活动,并计算观察者之间的协议。方法:回顾性纳入2015年6月至2021年7月在我院连续就诊的CD患者。所有患者在治疗后均行回肠结肠镜检查。2周内进行GIUS,独立计算四次GIUS评分。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定截断值。计算Cohen's kappa(κ)系数以估计GIUS结果之间的一致性。结果:共纳入106例CD患者。80.2%(85/106)为内镜活动(SES-CD≥3),8.49%(9/106)为重症(SES-CD≥9)。所有GIUS特征(肠壁厚度、彩色多普勒征象、肠壁分层、肠系膜炎症信号)在评估CD活动方面均具有统计学意义(结论:GIUS评分是评估CD活动的有效、可靠的方法。BUSS具有较高的准确性和良好的观察者间一致性,更适合于治疗评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determining the accuracy and interobserver agreement of four ultrasound scores in Crohn's disease assessment: correlations with endoscopy.

Background: Gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) is recommended for monitoring Crohn's disease (CD). GIUS scores are used to quantify CD activity. Among them, IBUS-SAS (International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score), BUSS (Bowel Ultrasound Score), Simple-US (Simple Ultrasound Score), and SUS-CD (Simple Ultrasound Score for Crohn's Disease) are most commonly used. This study aimed to compare and correlate the performance of such indicators with endoscopic activity and to calculate interobserver agreement.

Methods: Consecutive CD patients at our hospital between June 2015 and July 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients underwent ileocolonoscopy after medical treatment. GIUS was performed within 2 weeks and four GIUS scores were independently calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to determine a cut-off value. Cohen's kappa(κ) coefficient was calculated to estimate the agreement between GIUS findings.

Results: A total of 106 CD patients were enrolled. 80.2% (85/106) were endoscopic active (SES-CD≥3), and 8.49% (9/106) were severe cases (SES-CD≥9). All GIUS features (bowel wall thickness, color doppler signs, bowel wall stratification, inflammatory signals at the mesentery) were statistically significant in assessing CD activity (p<0.05). IBUS-SAS showed the highest AUC (0.98; 95% CI:0.96-1.00) and specificity (95.2%) for a cut-off value of 46.50. However, IBUS-SAS had only moderate agreement (Cohen's κ=0.427; p<0.001). BUSS had substantial interobserver agreement (Cohen's κ=0.947; p< 0.001), with a similar diagnostic value [sensitivity, 100.0%; accuracy, 95.3%; AUC of 0.96(95% CI:0.91-1.00) for a cut-off value of 4.58].

Conclusions: GIUS score is an efficient and reliable method to assess CD activity. BUSS achieved a high accuracy and excellent interobserver agreement, which is more suitable for treatment assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (CTG), published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), is a peer-reviewed open access online journal dedicated to innovative clinical work in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. CTG hopes to fulfill an unmet need for clinicians and scientists by welcoming novel cohort studies, early-phase clinical trials, qualitative and quantitative epidemiologic research, hypothesis-generating research, studies of novel mechanisms and methodologies including public health interventions, and integration of approaches across organs and disciplines. CTG also welcomes hypothesis-generating small studies, methods papers, and translational research with clear applications to human physiology or disease. Colon and small bowel Endoscopy and novel diagnostics Esophagus Functional GI disorders Immunology of the GI tract Microbiology of the GI tract Inflammatory bowel disease Pancreas and biliary tract Liver Pathology Pediatrics Preventative medicine Nutrition/obesity Stomach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信