{"title":"一线辛替单抗加anlotinib与化疗治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:一项开放标签随机对照试验","authors":"Tianqing Chu, Hua Zhong, Zhuang Yu, Jing Wang, Yanqiu Zhao, Xiaoqian Mu, Xinmin Yu, Xun Shi, Qingming Shi, Maojing Guan, Cuimin Ding, Nan Geng, Jialin Qian, Baohui Han","doi":"10.1002/cac2.12654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with standard platinum-based chemotherapy was suboptimal, with safety concerns. Following encouraging results from a preliminary phase I study, this phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of first-line sintilimab and anlotinib in metastatic NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-label, randomized controlled trial (NCT04124731), metastatic NSCLC without epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), or proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1) mutations, and previous treatments for metastatic disease were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either sintilimab (200 mg every 3 weeks) plus anlotinib (12 mg D1-14 every 3 weeks) or a standard platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. Patients in the chemotherapy group were permitted to switch to sintilimab after disease progression. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 2019 to March 2023, 99 patients were randomized into the sintilimab plus anlotinib group (n = 49) and the chemotherapy group (n = 50). The ORR was significantly higher in the sintilimab plus anlotinib group (44.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 30.7%-59.8%) compared to the chemotherapy group (18.0%; 95% CI = 8.6%-31.4%, P = 0.003). Progression-free survival (PFS) was also notably longer (median: 14.4 vs. 5.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.23-0.67; P < 0.001). The 24-month overall survival rate was 58.4% (95% CI = 40.4%-72.6%) and 43.2% (95% CI = 26.0%-59.2%), respectively. The rate of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was lower in the sintilimab plus anlotinib group (28.0%) than in the chemotherapy group (49.0%), especially for the hematological toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First-line sintilimab plus anlotinib showed improved ORR and PFS, alongside a superior safety profile, compared to the standard platinum-based chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9495,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of first-line sintilimab plus anlotinib versus chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II, open-label, randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tianqing Chu, Hua Zhong, Zhuang Yu, Jing Wang, Yanqiu Zhao, Xiaoqian Mu, Xinmin Yu, Xun Shi, Qingming Shi, Maojing Guan, Cuimin Ding, Nan Geng, Jialin Qian, Baohui Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cac2.12654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with standard platinum-based chemotherapy was suboptimal, with safety concerns. Following encouraging results from a preliminary phase I study, this phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of first-line sintilimab and anlotinib in metastatic NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-label, randomized controlled trial (NCT04124731), metastatic NSCLC without epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), or proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1) mutations, and previous treatments for metastatic disease were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either sintilimab (200 mg every 3 weeks) plus anlotinib (12 mg D1-14 every 3 weeks) or a standard platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. Patients in the chemotherapy group were permitted to switch to sintilimab after disease progression. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 2019 to March 2023, 99 patients were randomized into the sintilimab plus anlotinib group (n = 49) and the chemotherapy group (n = 50). The ORR was significantly higher in the sintilimab plus anlotinib group (44.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 30.7%-59.8%) compared to the chemotherapy group (18.0%; 95% CI = 8.6%-31.4%, P = 0.003). Progression-free survival (PFS) was also notably longer (median: 14.4 vs. 5.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.23-0.67; P < 0.001). The 24-month overall survival rate was 58.4% (95% CI = 40.4%-72.6%) and 43.2% (95% CI = 26.0%-59.2%), respectively. The rate of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was lower in the sintilimab plus anlotinib group (28.0%) than in the chemotherapy group (49.0%), especially for the hematological toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First-line sintilimab plus anlotinib showed improved ORR and PFS, alongside a superior safety profile, compared to the standard platinum-based chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Communications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12654\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12654","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者接受标准铂基化疗的预后不理想,存在安全性问题。在初步I期研究取得令人鼓舞的结果之后,这项II期试验调查了一线sintilimab和anlotinib治疗转移性NSCLC的有效性和安全性。方法:在这项开放标签、随机对照试验(NCT04124731)中,纳入了无上皮生长因子受体(EGFR)、间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)或原癌基因酪氨酸蛋白激酶ROS (ROS1)突变的转移性NSCLC,以及既往治疗过的转移性疾病。参与者以1:1的比例随机分配到辛替单抗(每3周200毫克)加安洛替尼(每3周12毫克D1-14)或标准铂基化疗方案。化疗组的患者在疾病进展后被允许改用辛替单抗。主要终点为客观缓解率(ORR)。结果:2019年11月至2023年3月,99例患者随机分为辛替单抗联合安洛替尼组(n = 49)和化疗组(n = 50)。辛替单抗联合安洛替尼组的ORR显著更高(44.9%;95%可信区间[CI] = 30.7%-59.8%)与化疗组(18.0%;95% ci = 8.6% ~ 31.4%, p = 0.003)。无进展生存期(PFS)也明显更长(中位数:14.4个月vs. 5.6个月;风险比[HR] = 0.39;95% ci = 0.23-0.67;P < 0.001)。24个月总生存率分别为58.4% (95% CI = 40.4% ~ 72.6%)和43.2% (95% CI = 26.0% ~ 59.2%)。辛替单抗加安洛替尼组3级及以上治疗相关不良事件发生率(28.0%)低于化疗组(49.0%),特别是血液毒性。结论:与转移性NSCLC患者的标准铂基化疗相比,一线sintilimab + anlotinib显示出改善的ORR和PFS,以及优越的安全性。
Efficacy and safety of first-line sintilimab plus anlotinib versus chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II, open-label, randomized controlled trial.
Background: The prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with standard platinum-based chemotherapy was suboptimal, with safety concerns. Following encouraging results from a preliminary phase I study, this phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of first-line sintilimab and anlotinib in metastatic NSCLC.
Methods: In this open-label, randomized controlled trial (NCT04124731), metastatic NSCLC without epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), or proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1) mutations, and previous treatments for metastatic disease were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either sintilimab (200 mg every 3 weeks) plus anlotinib (12 mg D1-14 every 3 weeks) or a standard platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. Patients in the chemotherapy group were permitted to switch to sintilimab after disease progression. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR).
Results: From November 2019 to March 2023, 99 patients were randomized into the sintilimab plus anlotinib group (n = 49) and the chemotherapy group (n = 50). The ORR was significantly higher in the sintilimab plus anlotinib group (44.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 30.7%-59.8%) compared to the chemotherapy group (18.0%; 95% CI = 8.6%-31.4%, P = 0.003). Progression-free survival (PFS) was also notably longer (median: 14.4 vs. 5.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.23-0.67; P < 0.001). The 24-month overall survival rate was 58.4% (95% CI = 40.4%-72.6%) and 43.2% (95% CI = 26.0%-59.2%), respectively. The rate of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was lower in the sintilimab plus anlotinib group (28.0%) than in the chemotherapy group (49.0%), especially for the hematological toxicities.
Conclusion: First-line sintilimab plus anlotinib showed improved ORR and PFS, alongside a superior safety profile, compared to the standard platinum-based chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC patients.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Communications is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses basic, clinical, and translational cancer research. The journal welcomes submissions concerning clinical trials, epidemiology, molecular and cellular biology, and genetics.