横断面调查检查加拿大兽医的经验和犬类进口的看法。

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Catherine R Belanger, J Scott Weese, Maureen E C Anderson, Kelsey L Spence, Katie M Clow
{"title":"横断面调查检查加拿大兽医的经验和犬类进口的看法。","authors":"Catherine R Belanger, J Scott Weese, Maureen E C Anderson, Kelsey L Spence, Katie M Clow","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As numbers of dogs entering Canada from abroad are increasing, it is essential to understand the scope, challenges, and risks associated with canine importation. Canadian veterinarians' collective experience with and clinical knowledge of imported dogs can provide valuable insights into this practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe Canadian veterinarians' experiences with, and perspectives of, imported dogs in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Procedure: </strong>An anonymous, online survey was circulated to Canadian veterinarians, <i>via</i> national and provincial veterinary associations, from April to June 2021. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, univariable logistic regression, and content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 524 responses were included. Veterinarians reported imported dogs mainly originating from the United States (89%) and imported <i>via</i> rescue organizations (92%). Few reported imported dogs arriving with core vaccines or parasiticides administered. Despite infectious disease concerns, only 14% routinely implemented enhanced infection-control practices with imported dogs in clinics. Resources outlining country-specific disease risks, foreign disease screening, and client education were deemed highly valuable for supporting clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and clinical relevance: </strong>Canadian veterinarians' experiences reinforced gaps in the healthcare of imported dogs, highlighted inconsistencies in clinical management of these dogs, and identified areas in which educational resources could improve animal health and the practice of importing dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9429,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Veterinary Journal-revue Veterinaire Canadienne","volume":"66 1","pages":"86-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cross-sectional survey examining Canadian veterinarians' experiences with and perceptions of canine importation.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine R Belanger, J Scott Weese, Maureen E C Anderson, Kelsey L Spence, Katie M Clow\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As numbers of dogs entering Canada from abroad are increasing, it is essential to understand the scope, challenges, and risks associated with canine importation. Canadian veterinarians' collective experience with and clinical knowledge of imported dogs can provide valuable insights into this practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe Canadian veterinarians' experiences with, and perspectives of, imported dogs in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Procedure: </strong>An anonymous, online survey was circulated to Canadian veterinarians, <i>via</i> national and provincial veterinary associations, from April to June 2021. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, univariable logistic regression, and content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 524 responses were included. Veterinarians reported imported dogs mainly originating from the United States (89%) and imported <i>via</i> rescue organizations (92%). Few reported imported dogs arriving with core vaccines or parasiticides administered. Despite infectious disease concerns, only 14% routinely implemented enhanced infection-control practices with imported dogs in clinics. Resources outlining country-specific disease risks, foreign disease screening, and client education were deemed highly valuable for supporting clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and clinical relevance: </strong>Canadian veterinarians' experiences reinforced gaps in the healthcare of imported dogs, highlighted inconsistencies in clinical management of these dogs, and identified areas in which educational resources could improve animal health and the practice of importing dogs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Veterinary Journal-revue Veterinaire Canadienne\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"86-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705182/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Veterinary Journal-revue Veterinaire Canadienne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Veterinary Journal-revue Veterinaire Canadienne","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着从国外进入加拿大的狗的数量不断增加,了解犬类进口的范围、挑战和风险是至关重要的。加拿大兽医对进口狗的集体经验和临床知识可以为这种做法提供宝贵的见解。目的:描述加拿大兽医在临床实践中对进口犬的经验和观点。程序:从2021年4月至6月,通过国家和省级兽医协会向加拿大兽医分发了一份匿名在线调查。采用描述性统计、单变量逻辑回归和内容分析对反应进行分析。结果:共纳入524份问卷。兽医报告的进口狗主要来自美国(89%)和通过救援组织进口(92%)。很少有报告说进口的狗携带了核心疫苗或杀寄生虫剂。尽管存在传染病问题,但只有14%的诊所对进口犬例行实施加强感染控制措施。概述特定国家疾病风险、国外疾病筛查和客户教育的资源被认为对支持临床实践非常有价值。结论和临床意义:加拿大兽医的经验加强了进口犬保健方面的差距,突出了这些犬的临床管理方面的不一致性,并确定了教育资源可以改善动物健康和进口犬实践的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A cross-sectional survey examining Canadian veterinarians' experiences with and perceptions of canine importation.

Background: As numbers of dogs entering Canada from abroad are increasing, it is essential to understand the scope, challenges, and risks associated with canine importation. Canadian veterinarians' collective experience with and clinical knowledge of imported dogs can provide valuable insights into this practice.

Objective: To describe Canadian veterinarians' experiences with, and perspectives of, imported dogs in clinical practice.

Procedure: An anonymous, online survey was circulated to Canadian veterinarians, via national and provincial veterinary associations, from April to June 2021. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, univariable logistic regression, and content analysis.

Results: A total of 524 responses were included. Veterinarians reported imported dogs mainly originating from the United States (89%) and imported via rescue organizations (92%). Few reported imported dogs arriving with core vaccines or parasiticides administered. Despite infectious disease concerns, only 14% routinely implemented enhanced infection-control practices with imported dogs in clinics. Resources outlining country-specific disease risks, foreign disease screening, and client education were deemed highly valuable for supporting clinical practice.

Conclusion and clinical relevance: Canadian veterinarians' experiences reinforced gaps in the healthcare of imported dogs, highlighted inconsistencies in clinical management of these dogs, and identified areas in which educational resources could improve animal health and the practice of importing dogs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Veterinary Journal (CVJ) provides a forum for the discussion of all matters relevant to the veterinary profession. The mission of the Journal is to educate by informing readers of progress in clinical veterinary medicine, clinical veterinary research, and related fields of endeavor. The key objective of The CVJ is to promote the art and science of veterinary medicine and the betterment of animal health. A report suggesting that animals have been unnecessarily subjected to adverse, stressful, or harsh conditions or treatments will not be processed for publication. Experimental studies using animals will only be considered for publication if the studies have been approved by an institutional animal care committee, or equivalent, and the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care, or equivalent, have been followed by the author(s).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信