评估危重和非危重患者万古霉素与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦或美罗培南联合使用的急性肾损伤风险和死亡率:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Abdulmajeed M Alshehri, Majed S Al Yami, Atheer Aldairem, Lama Alfehaid, Abdulaali R Almutairi, Omar A Almohammed, Amal Mohammad Badawoud
{"title":"评估危重和非危重患者万古霉素与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦或美罗培南联合使用的急性肾损伤风险和死亡率:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Abdulmajeed M Alshehri, Majed S Al Yami, Atheer Aldairem, Lama Alfehaid, Abdulaali R Almutairi, Omar A Almohammed, Amal Mohammad Badawoud","doi":"10.1186/s12879-024-10227-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are conflicting findings regarding the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality with vancomycin/piperacillin-tazobactam combination (VPT) and vancomycin/meropenem (VM). The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the risk of AKI and mortality between VPT and VM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational studies reporting the incidence of AKI and mortality in patients receiving VPT or VM between January 2017 and September 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The primary outcome of the analysis was the risk of AKI, and the secondary outcomes were the mortality rate, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and hospital length of stay (LOS). This meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for AKI, mortality, and RRT or mean difference and 95% CI for the LOS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies involving a total of 80,595 patients were included in the analysis. The odds of developing AKI were higher among patients who received the VPT versus those who received the VM combination (OR = 2.02; 95%CI 1.56-2.62). There were no differences between VPT and VM in the mortality and hospital length of stay; however, the odds of requiring RRT were higher among VPT group versus VM group (OR = 1.55; 95%CI 1.23-1.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that the use of VPT is associated with a higher risk of AKI compared to VM and highlight the need for cautious antibiotic selection and monitoring of renal function in patients receiving these combinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the risk of acute kidney injury and mortality associated with concomitant use of vancomycin with piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem in critically ill and non-critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulmajeed M Alshehri, Majed S Al Yami, Atheer Aldairem, Lama Alfehaid, Abdulaali R Almutairi, Omar A Almohammed, Amal Mohammad Badawoud\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12879-024-10227-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are conflicting findings regarding the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality with vancomycin/piperacillin-tazobactam combination (VPT) and vancomycin/meropenem (VM). The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the risk of AKI and mortality between VPT and VM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational studies reporting the incidence of AKI and mortality in patients receiving VPT or VM between January 2017 and September 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The primary outcome of the analysis was the risk of AKI, and the secondary outcomes were the mortality rate, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and hospital length of stay (LOS). This meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for AKI, mortality, and RRT or mean difference and 95% CI for the LOS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies involving a total of 80,595 patients were included in the analysis. The odds of developing AKI were higher among patients who received the VPT versus those who received the VM combination (OR = 2.02; 95%CI 1.56-2.62). There were no differences between VPT and VM in the mortality and hospital length of stay; however, the odds of requiring RRT were higher among VPT group versus VM group (OR = 1.55; 95%CI 1.23-1.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that the use of VPT is associated with a higher risk of AKI compared to VM and highlight the need for cautious antibiotic selection and monitoring of renal function in patients receiving these combinations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706157/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-10227-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-10227-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于万古霉素/哌西林-他唑巴坦联合用药(VPT)和万古霉素/美罗培南联合用药(VM)的急性肾损伤(AKI)风险和死亡率的研究结果相互矛盾。本荟萃分析的目的是比较VPT和VM之间AKI和死亡率的风险。方法:从PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science检索2017年1月至2024年9月期间报告VPT或VM患者AKI发生率和死亡率的观察性研究。分析的主要结局是AKI的风险,次要结局是死亡率、肾脏替代治疗(RRT)的需要和住院时间(LOS)。本荟萃分析采用随机效应模型来估计AKI、死亡率和RRT的比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI),或LOS的平均差异和95% CI。结果:17项研究共纳入80,595例患者。接受VPT的患者发生AKI的几率高于接受VM联合治疗的患者(OR = 2.02;95%可信区间1.56 - -2.62)。VPT和VM在死亡率和住院时间方面无差异;然而,与VM组相比,VPT组需要RRT的几率更高(OR = 1.55;95%可信区间1.23 - -1.96)。结论:研究结果表明,与VM相比,VPT的使用与AKI的风险更高相关,并强调了在接受这些联合治疗的患者中谨慎选择抗生素和监测肾功能的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the risk of acute kidney injury and mortality associated with concomitant use of vancomycin with piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem in critically ill and non-critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: There are conflicting findings regarding the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality with vancomycin/piperacillin-tazobactam combination (VPT) and vancomycin/meropenem (VM). The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the risk of AKI and mortality between VPT and VM.

Methods: Observational studies reporting the incidence of AKI and mortality in patients receiving VPT or VM between January 2017 and September 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The primary outcome of the analysis was the risk of AKI, and the secondary outcomes were the mortality rate, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and hospital length of stay (LOS). This meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for AKI, mortality, and RRT or mean difference and 95% CI for the LOS.

Results: Seventeen studies involving a total of 80,595 patients were included in the analysis. The odds of developing AKI were higher among patients who received the VPT versus those who received the VM combination (OR = 2.02; 95%CI 1.56-2.62). There were no differences between VPT and VM in the mortality and hospital length of stay; however, the odds of requiring RRT were higher among VPT group versus VM group (OR = 1.55; 95%CI 1.23-1.96).

Conclusion: The findings suggest that the use of VPT is associated with a higher risk of AKI compared to VM and highlight the need for cautious antibiotic selection and monitoring of renal function in patients receiving these combinations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信