Gaik Nersesian, Abhishek Jaiswal, Julia Stein, Ashwin Pillai, Theo M M H de By, Evgenij Potapov, David A Baran
{"title":"心脏伴侣3型左心室辅助装置植入后左心室大小对结果的影响:欧洲机械循环支持(EUROMACS)患者登记的分析","authors":"Gaik Nersesian, Abhishek Jaiswal, Julia Stein, Ashwin Pillai, Theo M M H de By, Evgenij Potapov, David A Baran","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the association of preimplant left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) with outcomes after HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Patients from the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) registry who underwent HM3 implantation from August 2014 to February 2023 (n = 834) were analyzed according to preoperative LVEDD: less than or equal to 65 (n = 251), 65-80 (n = 441), and greater than or equal to 80 mm (n = 142). The mean age was 54.4 ± 12.4 years, body surface area (BSA) 2.0 ± 0.23 m2, body mass index (BMI) 27.3 ± 5.0 kg/m2; 87.9% were male and 40% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Patients with LVEDD less than or equal to 65 mm were older (56.1 ± 11.0 vs. 53.8 ± 13.0 vs. 53.0 ± 12.3 years; p = 0.015), more female (17.9% vs. 11.6% vs. 4.9%; p < 0.001), smaller BSA (1.95 ± 2.03 vs. 2.01 ± 0.22 vs. 2.08 ± 0.22 m2; p < 0.01) and lower BMI (26.6 ± 4.8 vs. 27.4 ± 5.1 vs. 28.2 ± 5.0; p = 0.01) compared to LVEDD 65-80 and greater than or equal to 80 mm, respectively. One year survival was associated with increasing LVEDD (75.7% vs. 84.6% vs. 89.5%; p = 0.003). Patients with LVEDD less than or equal to 65 mm had a higher risk of postoperative right heart failure (14.7% vs.10.4% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.03), the risk for postoperative stroke was similar (10% vs. 12.8% vs. 9.5%; p = 0.4). A small left ventricular (LV) size (LVEDD ≤ 65 mm) was associated with an increase in postoperative right heart failure and unadjusted 1 year mortality in adults who underwent HM3 LVAD implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Left Ventricular Size on Outcomes Following HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Analysis of the European Registry for Patients With Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS).\",\"authors\":\"Gaik Nersesian, Abhishek Jaiswal, Julia Stein, Ashwin Pillai, Theo M M H de By, Evgenij Potapov, David A Baran\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We investigated the association of preimplant left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) with outcomes after HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Patients from the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) registry who underwent HM3 implantation from August 2014 to February 2023 (n = 834) were analyzed according to preoperative LVEDD: less than or equal to 65 (n = 251), 65-80 (n = 441), and greater than or equal to 80 mm (n = 142). The mean age was 54.4 ± 12.4 years, body surface area (BSA) 2.0 ± 0.23 m2, body mass index (BMI) 27.3 ± 5.0 kg/m2; 87.9% were male and 40% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Patients with LVEDD less than or equal to 65 mm were older (56.1 ± 11.0 vs. 53.8 ± 13.0 vs. 53.0 ± 12.3 years; p = 0.015), more female (17.9% vs. 11.6% vs. 4.9%; p < 0.001), smaller BSA (1.95 ± 2.03 vs. 2.01 ± 0.22 vs. 2.08 ± 0.22 m2; p < 0.01) and lower BMI (26.6 ± 4.8 vs. 27.4 ± 5.1 vs. 28.2 ± 5.0; p = 0.01) compared to LVEDD 65-80 and greater than or equal to 80 mm, respectively. One year survival was associated with increasing LVEDD (75.7% vs. 84.6% vs. 89.5%; p = 0.003). Patients with LVEDD less than or equal to 65 mm had a higher risk of postoperative right heart failure (14.7% vs.10.4% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.03), the risk for postoperative stroke was similar (10% vs. 12.8% vs. 9.5%; p = 0.4). A small left ventricular (LV) size (LVEDD ≤ 65 mm) was associated with an increase in postoperative right heart failure and unadjusted 1 year mortality in adults who underwent HM3 LVAD implantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002370\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002370","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们研究了植入前左室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)与心脏伴侣3型(HM3)左室辅助装置(LVAD)植入后预后的关系。2014年8月至2023年2月,欧洲机械循环支持患者登记处(EUROMACS)登记的接受HM3植入的患者(n = 834)根据术前LVEDD进行分析:小于或等于65 (n = 251), 65-80 (n = 441),大于或等于80 mm (n = 142)。平均年龄54.4±12.4岁,体表面积(BSA) 2.0±0.23 m2,体重指数(BMI) 27.3±5.0 kg/m2;87.9%为男性,40%为缺血性心肌病。LVEDD小于或等于65 mm的患者年龄较大(56.1±11.0∶53.8±13.0∶53.0±12.3岁;P = 0.015),女性更多(17.9% vs. 11.6% vs. 4.9%;p < 0.001), BSA较小(1.95±2.03 vs. 2.01±0.22 vs. 2.08±0.22 m2;p < 0.01)和较低的BMI(26.6±4.8∶27.4±5.1∶28.2±5.0;p = 0.01),与LVEDD相比,分别为65 ~ 80 mm和大于等于80 mm。1年生存率与LVEDD增加相关(75.7% vs. 84.6% vs. 89.5%;P = 0.003)。LVEDD小于或等于65 mm的患者术后右心衰的风险较高(14.7% vs.10.4% vs. 6.8%;P = 0.03),术后卒中的风险相似(10% vs. 12.8% vs. 9.5%;P = 0.4)。小左心室(LV)尺寸(LVEDD≤65 mm)与接受HM3左心室辅助器植入的成人术后右心衰和未经调整的1年死亡率增加相关。
Impact of Left Ventricular Size on Outcomes Following HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Analysis of the European Registry for Patients With Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS).
We investigated the association of preimplant left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) with outcomes after HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Patients from the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) registry who underwent HM3 implantation from August 2014 to February 2023 (n = 834) were analyzed according to preoperative LVEDD: less than or equal to 65 (n = 251), 65-80 (n = 441), and greater than or equal to 80 mm (n = 142). The mean age was 54.4 ± 12.4 years, body surface area (BSA) 2.0 ± 0.23 m2, body mass index (BMI) 27.3 ± 5.0 kg/m2; 87.9% were male and 40% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Patients with LVEDD less than or equal to 65 mm were older (56.1 ± 11.0 vs. 53.8 ± 13.0 vs. 53.0 ± 12.3 years; p = 0.015), more female (17.9% vs. 11.6% vs. 4.9%; p < 0.001), smaller BSA (1.95 ± 2.03 vs. 2.01 ± 0.22 vs. 2.08 ± 0.22 m2; p < 0.01) and lower BMI (26.6 ± 4.8 vs. 27.4 ± 5.1 vs. 28.2 ± 5.0; p = 0.01) compared to LVEDD 65-80 and greater than or equal to 80 mm, respectively. One year survival was associated with increasing LVEDD (75.7% vs. 84.6% vs. 89.5%; p = 0.003). Patients with LVEDD less than or equal to 65 mm had a higher risk of postoperative right heart failure (14.7% vs.10.4% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.03), the risk for postoperative stroke was similar (10% vs. 12.8% vs. 9.5%; p = 0.4). A small left ventricular (LV) size (LVEDD ≤ 65 mm) was associated with an increase in postoperative right heart failure and unadjusted 1 year mortality in adults who underwent HM3 LVAD implantation.
期刊介绍:
ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world.
The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.