传染病专家与ChatGPT®之间的推荐抗生素治疗协议。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Santiago Montiel-Romero, Sandra Rajme-López, Carla Marina Román-Montes, Alvaro López-Iñiguez, Héctor Orlando Rivera-Villegas, Eric Ochoa-Hein, María Fernanda González-Lara, Alfredo Ponce-de-León, Karla María Tamez-Torres, Bernardo Alfonso Martinez-Guerra
{"title":"传染病专家与ChatGPT®之间的推荐抗生素治疗协议。","authors":"Santiago Montiel-Romero, Sandra Rajme-López, Carla Marina Román-Montes, Alvaro López-Iñiguez, Héctor Orlando Rivera-Villegas, Eric Ochoa-Hein, María Fernanda González-Lara, Alfredo Ponce-de-León, Karla María Tamez-Torres, Bernardo Alfonso Martinez-Guerra","doi":"10.1186/s12879-024-10426-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance is a global threat to public health. Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT<sup>®</sup>) is a language model tool based on artificial intelligence. ChatGPT<sup>®</sup> could analyze data from antimicrobial susceptibility tests in real time, especially in places where infectious diseases (ID) specialists are not available. We aimed to evaluate the agreement between ChatGPT<sup>®</sup> and ID specialists regarding appropriate antibiotic prescription in simulated cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from microbiological isolates recovered in our center, we fabricated 100 cases of patients with different infections. Each case included age, infectious syndrome, isolated organism and complete antibiogram. Considering a precise set of instructions, the cases were introduced into ChatGPT<sup>®</sup> and presented to five ID specialists. For each case, we asked, (1) \"What is the most appropriate antibiotic that should be prescribed to the patient in the clinical case?\" and (2) \"According to the interpretation of the antibiogram, what is the most probable mechanism of resistance?\". We then calculated the agreement between ID specialists and ChatGPT<sup>®</sup>, as well as Cohen's kappa coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding the recommended antibiotic prescription, agreement between ID specialists and ChatGPT<sup>®</sup> was observed in 51/100 cases. The calculated kappa coefficient was 0.48. Agreement on antimicrobial resistance mechanisms was observed in 42/100 cases. The calculated kappa coefficient was 0.39. In a subanalysis according to infectious syndromes and microorganisms, Agreement (range 25 - 80%) and kappa coefficients (range 0.21-0.79) varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found poor agreement between ID specialists and ChatGPT<sup>®</sup> regarding the recommended antibiotic management in simulated clinical cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommended antibiotic treatment agreement between infectious diseases specialists and ChatGPT<sup>®</sup>.\",\"authors\":\"Santiago Montiel-Romero, Sandra Rajme-López, Carla Marina Román-Montes, Alvaro López-Iñiguez, Héctor Orlando Rivera-Villegas, Eric Ochoa-Hein, María Fernanda González-Lara, Alfredo Ponce-de-León, Karla María Tamez-Torres, Bernardo Alfonso Martinez-Guerra\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12879-024-10426-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance is a global threat to public health. Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT<sup>®</sup>) is a language model tool based on artificial intelligence. ChatGPT<sup>®</sup> could analyze data from antimicrobial susceptibility tests in real time, especially in places where infectious diseases (ID) specialists are not available. We aimed to evaluate the agreement between ChatGPT<sup>®</sup> and ID specialists regarding appropriate antibiotic prescription in simulated cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from microbiological isolates recovered in our center, we fabricated 100 cases of patients with different infections. Each case included age, infectious syndrome, isolated organism and complete antibiogram. Considering a precise set of instructions, the cases were introduced into ChatGPT<sup>®</sup> and presented to five ID specialists. For each case, we asked, (1) \\\"What is the most appropriate antibiotic that should be prescribed to the patient in the clinical case?\\\" and (2) \\\"According to the interpretation of the antibiogram, what is the most probable mechanism of resistance?\\\". We then calculated the agreement between ID specialists and ChatGPT<sup>®</sup>, as well as Cohen's kappa coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding the recommended antibiotic prescription, agreement between ID specialists and ChatGPT<sup>®</sup> was observed in 51/100 cases. The calculated kappa coefficient was 0.48. Agreement on antimicrobial resistance mechanisms was observed in 42/100 cases. The calculated kappa coefficient was 0.39. In a subanalysis according to infectious syndromes and microorganisms, Agreement (range 25 - 80%) and kappa coefficients (range 0.21-0.79) varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found poor agreement between ID specialists and ChatGPT<sup>®</sup> regarding the recommended antibiotic management in simulated clinical cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706082/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-10426-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-10426-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗菌素耐药性是对公共卫生的全球性威胁。聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT®)是基于人工智能的语言模型工具。ChatGPT®可以实时分析抗菌药物敏感性测试数据,特别是在没有传染病(ID)专家的地方。我们旨在评估ChatGPT®和ID专家之间关于模拟病例中适当抗生素处方的协议。方法:利用本中心回收的微生物分离株资料,虚构100例不同感染的患者。每个病例包括年龄、感染综合征、分离菌和完整的抗生素谱。考虑到一组精确的指令,这些案例被引入ChatGPT®,并提交给五位ID专家。对于每种情况,我们问,(1)“在临床病例中,应该给病人开什么最合适的抗生素?”以及(2)“根据抗生素图的解释,最可能的耐药机制是什么?”然后,我们计算了ID专家和ChatGPT®之间的协议,以及科恩的卡帕系数。结果:在推荐的抗生素处方方面,51/100的病例中,ID专家与ChatGPT®的意见一致。计算kappa系数为0.48。100例病例中有42例的耐药机制一致。计算kappa系数为0.39。在根据感染综合征和微生物进行的亚分析中,一致性(范围25 - 80%)和kappa系数(范围0.21-0.79)各不相同。结论:我们发现在模拟临床病例中,ID专家和ChatGPT®对推荐的抗生素管理意见不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recommended antibiotic treatment agreement between infectious diseases specialists and ChatGPT®.

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a global threat to public health. Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT®) is a language model tool based on artificial intelligence. ChatGPT® could analyze data from antimicrobial susceptibility tests in real time, especially in places where infectious diseases (ID) specialists are not available. We aimed to evaluate the agreement between ChatGPT® and ID specialists regarding appropriate antibiotic prescription in simulated cases.

Methods: Using data from microbiological isolates recovered in our center, we fabricated 100 cases of patients with different infections. Each case included age, infectious syndrome, isolated organism and complete antibiogram. Considering a precise set of instructions, the cases were introduced into ChatGPT® and presented to five ID specialists. For each case, we asked, (1) "What is the most appropriate antibiotic that should be prescribed to the patient in the clinical case?" and (2) "According to the interpretation of the antibiogram, what is the most probable mechanism of resistance?". We then calculated the agreement between ID specialists and ChatGPT®, as well as Cohen's kappa coefficient.

Results: Regarding the recommended antibiotic prescription, agreement between ID specialists and ChatGPT® was observed in 51/100 cases. The calculated kappa coefficient was 0.48. Agreement on antimicrobial resistance mechanisms was observed in 42/100 cases. The calculated kappa coefficient was 0.39. In a subanalysis according to infectious syndromes and microorganisms, Agreement (range 25 - 80%) and kappa coefficients (range 0.21-0.79) varied.

Conclusion: We found poor agreement between ID specialists and ChatGPT® regarding the recommended antibiotic management in simulated clinical cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信