San-Fang Chou, Chun-Yu Hsieh, Kuang-Chau Tsai, Yuan-Hung Liu, Chieh-Min Fan, Jie-Ren Mi Le, Fu-Shan Jaw, Chung-Ta Chang, Shyh-Shyong Sim, Yen-Wen Wu, Ting-Li Tai, Kuan-Chang Chen, Yuan-Hui Wu, Chien-Chieh Hsieh
{"title":"COVID-19大流行对台湾北部STEMI患者“门到设备”时间段和临床结果的影响","authors":"San-Fang Chou, Chun-Yu Hsieh, Kuang-Chau Tsai, Yuan-Hung Liu, Chieh-Min Fan, Jie-Ren Mi Le, Fu-Shan Jaw, Chung-Ta Chang, Shyh-Shyong Sim, Yen-Wen Wu, Ting-Li Tai, Kuan-Chang Chen, Yuan-Hui Wu, Chien-Chieh Hsieh","doi":"10.6515/ACS.202501_41(1).20241021A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prompt primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is crucial for the prognosis and reduction of myocardial damage in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had multifaceted impacts on healthcare. This study assessed the effects of the pandemic on pPCI procedures and clinical outcomes in emergency STEMI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study analyzed STEMI patients who underwent pPCI from February 2019 to January 2022. The COVID-19 pandemic was categorized into three periods: pre-COVID-19 (Period-I), early-pandemic (Period-II), and epidemic (Period-III). The impacts on Door-to-Device time, its segments, and clinical outcomes were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 404 STEMI patients were included, with a reduced number in Period-III. Compared to Period-I, the time intervals of Door-to-electrocardiogram (ECG), ECG-to-Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activation (CCLA), and CCLA-to-Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Door in Period III were extended by 0.62 minutes (p = 0.006), 3.30 minutes (p = 0.009), and 9.65 minutes (p < 0.001), respectively. In contrast, the Angio-to-Device time was shorter in Period- II and III by 2.60 and 4.08 minutes (p < 0.001), respectively. Overall Door-to-Device time increased by 10.06 minutes (p < 0.001) in Period-III but decreased by 3.67 minutes in Period-II (p = 0.017). The odds of achieving a Door-to-Device time ≤ 90 minutes decreased by 70% in Period-III (p = 0.002). Clinical outcomes, including intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission rate, remained stable across periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic had various effects on different segments of the Door-to-Device procedure, and they were influenced by the complex interplay between infection control measures and clinical workflow. The stability of clinical outcomes reflects the resilience and effective adaptations of the healthcare system during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":6957,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cardiologica Sinica","volume":"41 1","pages":"121-129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Door-to-Device Time Segments and Clinical Outcomes for STEMI Patients in Northern Taiwan.\",\"authors\":\"San-Fang Chou, Chun-Yu Hsieh, Kuang-Chau Tsai, Yuan-Hung Liu, Chieh-Min Fan, Jie-Ren Mi Le, Fu-Shan Jaw, Chung-Ta Chang, Shyh-Shyong Sim, Yen-Wen Wu, Ting-Li Tai, Kuan-Chang Chen, Yuan-Hui Wu, Chien-Chieh Hsieh\",\"doi\":\"10.6515/ACS.202501_41(1).20241021A\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prompt primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is crucial for the prognosis and reduction of myocardial damage in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had multifaceted impacts on healthcare. This study assessed the effects of the pandemic on pPCI procedures and clinical outcomes in emergency STEMI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study analyzed STEMI patients who underwent pPCI from February 2019 to January 2022. The COVID-19 pandemic was categorized into three periods: pre-COVID-19 (Period-I), early-pandemic (Period-II), and epidemic (Period-III). The impacts on Door-to-Device time, its segments, and clinical outcomes were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 404 STEMI patients were included, with a reduced number in Period-III. Compared to Period-I, the time intervals of Door-to-electrocardiogram (ECG), ECG-to-Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activation (CCLA), and CCLA-to-Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Door in Period III were extended by 0.62 minutes (p = 0.006), 3.30 minutes (p = 0.009), and 9.65 minutes (p < 0.001), respectively. In contrast, the Angio-to-Device time was shorter in Period- II and III by 2.60 and 4.08 minutes (p < 0.001), respectively. Overall Door-to-Device time increased by 10.06 minutes (p < 0.001) in Period-III but decreased by 3.67 minutes in Period-II (p = 0.017). The odds of achieving a Door-to-Device time ≤ 90 minutes decreased by 70% in Period-III (p = 0.002). Clinical outcomes, including intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission rate, remained stable across periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic had various effects on different segments of the Door-to-Device procedure, and they were influenced by the complex interplay between infection control measures and clinical workflow. The stability of clinical outcomes reflects the resilience and effective adaptations of the healthcare system during the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Cardiologica Sinica\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"121-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701492/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Cardiologica Sinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.202501_41(1).20241021A\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cardiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.202501_41(1).20241021A","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Door-to-Device Time Segments and Clinical Outcomes for STEMI Patients in Northern Taiwan.
Background: Prompt primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is crucial for the prognosis and reduction of myocardial damage in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had multifaceted impacts on healthcare. This study assessed the effects of the pandemic on pPCI procedures and clinical outcomes in emergency STEMI patients.
Methods: This retrospective, single-center study analyzed STEMI patients who underwent pPCI from February 2019 to January 2022. The COVID-19 pandemic was categorized into three periods: pre-COVID-19 (Period-I), early-pandemic (Period-II), and epidemic (Period-III). The impacts on Door-to-Device time, its segments, and clinical outcomes were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.
Results: A total of 404 STEMI patients were included, with a reduced number in Period-III. Compared to Period-I, the time intervals of Door-to-electrocardiogram (ECG), ECG-to-Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activation (CCLA), and CCLA-to-Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Door in Period III were extended by 0.62 minutes (p = 0.006), 3.30 minutes (p = 0.009), and 9.65 minutes (p < 0.001), respectively. In contrast, the Angio-to-Device time was shorter in Period- II and III by 2.60 and 4.08 minutes (p < 0.001), respectively. Overall Door-to-Device time increased by 10.06 minutes (p < 0.001) in Period-III but decreased by 3.67 minutes in Period-II (p = 0.017). The odds of achieving a Door-to-Device time ≤ 90 minutes decreased by 70% in Period-III (p = 0.002). Clinical outcomes, including intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission rate, remained stable across periods.
Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic had various effects on different segments of the Door-to-Device procedure, and they were influenced by the complex interplay between infection control measures and clinical workflow. The stability of clinical outcomes reflects the resilience and effective adaptations of the healthcare system during the pandemic.
期刊介绍：
Acta Cardiologica Sinica welcomes all the papers in the fields related to cardiovascular medicine including basic research, vascular biology, clinical pharmacology, clinical trial, critical care medicine, coronary artery disease, interventional cardiology, arrythmia and electrophysiology, atherosclerosis, hypertension, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, valvular and structure cardiac disease, pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, and so on. We received papers from more than 20 countries and areas of the world. Currently, 40% of the papers were submitted to Acta Cardiologica Sinica from Taiwan, 20% from China, and 20% from the other countries and areas in the world. The acceptance rate for publication was around 50% in general.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
