肾细胞癌转移至胰腺与胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的CT或MRI鉴别。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Marie-Joy Nduwimana, Ceylan Colak, Cem Bilgin, Blake A Kassmeyer, Candice M Bolan, Christine O Menias, Sudhakar K Venkatesh
{"title":"肾细胞癌转移至胰腺与胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的CT或MRI鉴别。","authors":"Marie-Joy Nduwimana, Ceylan Colak, Cem Bilgin, Blake A Kassmeyer, Candice M Bolan, Christine O Menias, Sudhakar K Venkatesh","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04787-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether renal cell carcinoma metastases (RCC-Mets) to the pancreas can be differentiated from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) in patients with RCC on CT or MRI at presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with biopsy-proven RCC-Mets (n = 102) or PNETs (n = 32) at diagnosis or after nephrectomy for RCC. Inter-observer agreement (Cohen kappa) was assessed in 95 patients with independent reads by two radiologists, with discrepancies resolved by consensus for final analysis. The remaining 39 cases underwent consensus reads by two different radiologists for final analysis. The CT/MRI images were reviewed for number, size, regional distribution, parenchymal location (exophytic or intrapancreatic), contrast-enhancement, and enhancement pattern of pancreatic lesions in the available phases. Statistical tests were conducted using two sample t-tests and Pearson's chi-squared test for numeric and categorical variables respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group comprised of 134 patients (90 males) with 265 lesions (229 RCC-Mets and 36 PNETs). Patients with PNETs were significantly younger (62 ± 12 years vs. 67 ± 9 years, p = 0.013). Inter-observer agreement for CT/MRI features was excellent across multiple imaging variables (k = 0.86-1.00). Most PNETs were single lesions (88 vs. 63%, p = 0.008), smaller in size (14 mm vs. 23 mm, p = 0.042), more common in the body and tail (81 vs. 57%, p = 0.01), showed homogeneous contrast enhancement (64-79% vs. 39-49%, p < 0.01-0.03), less T1-hypointense (80 vs. 99%, p = 0.002) and more DWI hyperintense (71 vs. 58%, p < 0.001) compared to RCC-Mets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PNETs are typically single, occur in distal pancreas, and enhance homogeneously compared to RCC-Mets which are often multiple, occur in the proximal pancreas, and enhance heterogeneously.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiation between renal cell carcinoma metastases to the pancreas and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in patients with renal cell carcinoma on CT or MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Joy Nduwimana, Ceylan Colak, Cem Bilgin, Blake A Kassmeyer, Candice M Bolan, Christine O Menias, Sudhakar K Venkatesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-024-04787-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether renal cell carcinoma metastases (RCC-Mets) to the pancreas can be differentiated from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) in patients with RCC on CT or MRI at presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with biopsy-proven RCC-Mets (n = 102) or PNETs (n = 32) at diagnosis or after nephrectomy for RCC. Inter-observer agreement (Cohen kappa) was assessed in 95 patients with independent reads by two radiologists, with discrepancies resolved by consensus for final analysis. The remaining 39 cases underwent consensus reads by two different radiologists for final analysis. The CT/MRI images were reviewed for number, size, regional distribution, parenchymal location (exophytic or intrapancreatic), contrast-enhancement, and enhancement pattern of pancreatic lesions in the available phases. Statistical tests were conducted using two sample t-tests and Pearson's chi-squared test for numeric and categorical variables respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group comprised of 134 patients (90 males) with 265 lesions (229 RCC-Mets and 36 PNETs). Patients with PNETs were significantly younger (62 ± 12 years vs. 67 ± 9 years, p = 0.013). Inter-observer agreement for CT/MRI features was excellent across multiple imaging variables (k = 0.86-1.00). Most PNETs were single lesions (88 vs. 63%, p = 0.008), smaller in size (14 mm vs. 23 mm, p = 0.042), more common in the body and tail (81 vs. 57%, p = 0.01), showed homogeneous contrast enhancement (64-79% vs. 39-49%, p < 0.01-0.03), less T1-hypointense (80 vs. 99%, p = 0.002) and more DWI hyperintense (71 vs. 58%, p < 0.001) compared to RCC-Mets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PNETs are typically single, occur in distal pancreas, and enhance homogeneously compared to RCC-Mets which are often multiple, occur in the proximal pancreas, and enhance heterogeneously.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04787-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04787-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨肾细胞癌(RCC- mets)向胰腺转移是否可以在CT或MRI上与胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(PNETs)区分。方法:本回顾性研究包括活检证实的肾细胞癌转移(n = 102)或肾细胞癌切除术后诊断或诊断为肾细胞癌的PNETs (n = 32)患者。两名放射科医生对95名独立阅读的患者进行了观察者间一致性(Cohen kappa)评估,差异通过共识解决并进行最终分析。其余39例由两名不同的放射科医生进行一致解读以进行最终分析。回顾CT/MRI图像的数量、大小、区域分布、实质位置(外生或胰腺内)、对比增强和胰腺病变在可用分期的增强模式。对数值变量和分类变量分别采用双样本t检验和Pearson卡方检验进行统计检验。结果:研究组包括134例患者(90例男性),共265个病变(229例RCC-Mets和36例PNETs)。PNETs患者明显年轻化(62±12岁比67±9岁,p = 0.013)。在多个成像变量中,CT/MRI特征的观察者间一致性非常好(k = 0.86-1.00)。多数PNETs为单发病变(88 vs. 63%, p = 0.008),体积较小(14 mm vs. 23 mm, p = 0.042),多发于身体和尾部(81 vs. 57%, p = 0.01),呈均匀增强(64-79% vs. 39-49%, p)。结论:PNETs通常为单发病变,多发于胰腺远端,增强均匀,而RCC-Mets常多发于胰腺近端,增强不均匀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differentiation between renal cell carcinoma metastases to the pancreas and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in patients with renal cell carcinoma on CT or MRI.

Purpose: To determine whether renal cell carcinoma metastases (RCC-Mets) to the pancreas can be differentiated from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) in patients with RCC on CT or MRI at presentation.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with biopsy-proven RCC-Mets (n = 102) or PNETs (n = 32) at diagnosis or after nephrectomy for RCC. Inter-observer agreement (Cohen kappa) was assessed in 95 patients with independent reads by two radiologists, with discrepancies resolved by consensus for final analysis. The remaining 39 cases underwent consensus reads by two different radiologists for final analysis. The CT/MRI images were reviewed for number, size, regional distribution, parenchymal location (exophytic or intrapancreatic), contrast-enhancement, and enhancement pattern of pancreatic lesions in the available phases. Statistical tests were conducted using two sample t-tests and Pearson's chi-squared test for numeric and categorical variables respectively.

Results: The study group comprised of 134 patients (90 males) with 265 lesions (229 RCC-Mets and 36 PNETs). Patients with PNETs were significantly younger (62 ± 12 years vs. 67 ± 9 years, p = 0.013). Inter-observer agreement for CT/MRI features was excellent across multiple imaging variables (k = 0.86-1.00). Most PNETs were single lesions (88 vs. 63%, p = 0.008), smaller in size (14 mm vs. 23 mm, p = 0.042), more common in the body and tail (81 vs. 57%, p = 0.01), showed homogeneous contrast enhancement (64-79% vs. 39-49%, p < 0.01-0.03), less T1-hypointense (80 vs. 99%, p = 0.002) and more DWI hyperintense (71 vs. 58%, p < 0.001) compared to RCC-Mets.

Conclusion: PNETs are typically single, occur in distal pancreas, and enhance homogeneously compared to RCC-Mets which are often multiple, occur in the proximal pancreas, and enhance heterogeneously.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信