使用连续流动同位素比质谱(CF-IRMS)的碳酸盐装置对方解石,白云石和菱镁矿进行准确和精确的稳定同位素分析的指南。

IF 1.8 3区 化学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Soujung Kim, Sang-Tae Kim, Martin Knyf
{"title":"使用连续流动同位素比质谱(CF-IRMS)的碳酸盐装置对方解石,白云石和菱镁矿进行准确和精确的稳定同位素分析的指南。","authors":"Soujung Kim,&nbsp;Sang-Tae Kim,&nbsp;Martin Knyf","doi":"10.1002/rcm.9958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>Carbonate minerals are one of the most popular samples for an automated sample preparation system for CF-IRMS, such as GasBench II and iso FLOW, but no standardized analytical protocols exist. This study gives guidelines on optimal analytic conditions for carbon and oxygen isotope analysis of Ca–Mg carbonates when using the carbonate–phosphoric acid reaction method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Calcite (CaCO<sub>3</sub>–McMaster Carrara), dolomite (CaMg(CO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>–MRSI Dolomite), and magnesite (MgCO<sub>3</sub>–ROM Brazil Magnesite) with two grain size fractions (&lt; 74 and 149–250 μm) were reacted with 103% (specific gravity of 1.92) phosphoric acid under He atmosphere in 12-mL borosilicate glass vials to examine the full <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O evolution of acid-liberated CO<sub>2</sub> for an extended reaction time of up to 12–30 days at 25°C and up to 3–7 days at 72°C.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>At 25°C, the optimal reaction time of calcite is 1 day for both grain size fractions while the optimal reaction time of 2–10 day is suggested for dolomite with a grain size of &lt; 74 μm. At 72°C, 30-min to 12-h or 45-min to 12-h reaction is optimal for calcite with &lt; 74-μm or 149- to 250-μm grain size fraction, respectively, whereas dolomite requires 12-h to 1-day reaction for both grain size fractions. The only optimal condition for magnesite is 6–7 days of reaction with &lt; 74-μm grain size at 72°C.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>To determine precise and accurate <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O values of a carbonate mineral using the carbonate–phosphoric acid reaction method, an optimal reaction time must be assessed for a given analytical condition to avoid nonequilibrium isotope effects and unnecessary oxygen isotope exchange of acid-liberated CO<sub>2</sub> in the carbonate reaction vessel. Our experimental result provides a guideline for the accurate and precise stable isotope analysis of Ca–Mg carbonate minerals.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":225,"journal":{"name":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","volume":"39 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines for Accurate and Precise Stable Isotope Analysis of Calcite, Dolomite, and Magnesite Using a Carbonate Device for Continuous Flow-Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (CF-IRMS)\",\"authors\":\"Soujung Kim,&nbsp;Sang-Tae Kim,&nbsp;Martin Knyf\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rcm.9958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Rationale</h3>\\n \\n <p>Carbonate minerals are one of the most popular samples for an automated sample preparation system for CF-IRMS, such as GasBench II and iso FLOW, but no standardized analytical protocols exist. This study gives guidelines on optimal analytic conditions for carbon and oxygen isotope analysis of Ca–Mg carbonates when using the carbonate–phosphoric acid reaction method.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Calcite (CaCO<sub>3</sub>–McMaster Carrara), dolomite (CaMg(CO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>–MRSI Dolomite), and magnesite (MgCO<sub>3</sub>–ROM Brazil Magnesite) with two grain size fractions (&lt; 74 and 149–250 μm) were reacted with 103% (specific gravity of 1.92) phosphoric acid under He atmosphere in 12-mL borosilicate glass vials to examine the full <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O evolution of acid-liberated CO<sub>2</sub> for an extended reaction time of up to 12–30 days at 25°C and up to 3–7 days at 72°C.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>At 25°C, the optimal reaction time of calcite is 1 day for both grain size fractions while the optimal reaction time of 2–10 day is suggested for dolomite with a grain size of &lt; 74 μm. At 72°C, 30-min to 12-h or 45-min to 12-h reaction is optimal for calcite with &lt; 74-μm or 149- to 250-μm grain size fraction, respectively, whereas dolomite requires 12-h to 1-day reaction for both grain size fractions. The only optimal condition for magnesite is 6–7 days of reaction with &lt; 74-μm grain size at 72°C.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>To determine precise and accurate <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O values of a carbonate mineral using the carbonate–phosphoric acid reaction method, an optimal reaction time must be assessed for a given analytical condition to avoid nonequilibrium isotope effects and unnecessary oxygen isotope exchange of acid-liberated CO<sub>2</sub> in the carbonate reaction vessel. Our experimental result provides a guideline for the accurate and precise stable isotope analysis of Ca–Mg carbonate minerals.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry\",\"volume\":\"39 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715619/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcm.9958\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcm.9958","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基本原理:碳酸盐矿物是CF-IRMS自动样品制备系统(如GasBench II和iso FLOW)中最受欢迎的样品之一,但目前还没有标准化的分析方案。本研究为碳酸盐-磷酸反应法分析Ca-Mg碳酸盐碳氧同位素的最佳分析条件提供了指导。方法:方解石(CaCO3-McMaster Carrara),白云石(CaMg(CO3)2-MRSI白云石)和菱镁矿(MgCO3-ROM巴西菱镁矿)具有两种粒度分数(13C和δ18O),酸释放的CO2在25°C下延长反应时间12-30天,在72°C下延长反应时间3-7天。结果:在25℃条件下,方解石和白云石的最佳反应时间均为1 d,白云石的最佳反应时间为2 ~ 10 d。为了准确准确地测定碳酸盐岩矿物的δ13C和δ18O值,必须在给定的分析条件下确定最佳反应时间,以避免非平衡同位素效应和碳酸盐岩反应容器中酸释放CO2不必要的氧同位素交换。实验结果为准确、精细地分析碳酸钙镁矿物的稳定同位素提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Guidelines for Accurate and Precise Stable Isotope Analysis of Calcite, Dolomite, and Magnesite Using a Carbonate Device for Continuous Flow-Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (CF-IRMS)

Guidelines for Accurate and Precise Stable Isotope Analysis of Calcite, Dolomite, and Magnesite Using a Carbonate Device for Continuous Flow-Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (CF-IRMS)

Rationale

Carbonate minerals are one of the most popular samples for an automated sample preparation system for CF-IRMS, such as GasBench II and iso FLOW, but no standardized analytical protocols exist. This study gives guidelines on optimal analytic conditions for carbon and oxygen isotope analysis of Ca–Mg carbonates when using the carbonate–phosphoric acid reaction method.

Methods

Calcite (CaCO3–McMaster Carrara), dolomite (CaMg(CO3)2–MRSI Dolomite), and magnesite (MgCO3–ROM Brazil Magnesite) with two grain size fractions (< 74 and 149–250 μm) were reacted with 103% (specific gravity of 1.92) phosphoric acid under He atmosphere in 12-mL borosilicate glass vials to examine the full δ13C and δ18O evolution of acid-liberated CO2 for an extended reaction time of up to 12–30 days at 25°C and up to 3–7 days at 72°C.

Results

At 25°C, the optimal reaction time of calcite is 1 day for both grain size fractions while the optimal reaction time of 2–10 day is suggested for dolomite with a grain size of < 74 μm. At 72°C, 30-min to 12-h or 45-min to 12-h reaction is optimal for calcite with < 74-μm or 149- to 250-μm grain size fraction, respectively, whereas dolomite requires 12-h to 1-day reaction for both grain size fractions. The only optimal condition for magnesite is 6–7 days of reaction with < 74-μm grain size at 72°C.

Conclusions

To determine precise and accurate δ13C and δ18O values of a carbonate mineral using the carbonate–phosphoric acid reaction method, an optimal reaction time must be assessed for a given analytical condition to avoid nonequilibrium isotope effects and unnecessary oxygen isotope exchange of acid-liberated CO2 in the carbonate reaction vessel. Our experimental result provides a guideline for the accurate and precise stable isotope analysis of Ca–Mg carbonate minerals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
219
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry is a journal whose aim is the rapid publication of original research results and ideas on all aspects of the science of gas-phase ions; it covers all the associated scientific disciplines. There is no formal limit on paper length ("rapid" is not synonymous with "brief"), but papers should be of a length that is commensurate with the importance and complexity of the results being reported. Contributions may be theoretical or practical in nature; they may deal with methods, techniques and applications, or with the interpretation of results; they may cover any area in science that depends directly on measurements made upon gaseous ions or that is associated with such measurements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信