Holly Nisbet, Nicola Lambe, Gemma A Miller, Andrea Doeschl-Wilson, David Barclay, Alexander Wheaton, Carol-Anne Duthie
{"title":"肉类产量和牛肉胴体的原始切割重量可以使用屠宰场内3D测量或EUROP分类等级以类似的精度预测。","authors":"Holly Nisbet, Nicola Lambe, Gemma A Miller, Andrea Doeschl-Wilson, David Barclay, Alexander Wheaton, Carol-Anne Duthie","doi":"10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three-dimensional (3D) measurements extracted from beef carcass images were used to predict the weight of four saleable meat yield (SMY) traits (total SMY and the SMY of the forequarter, flank, and hindquarter) and four primal cuts (sirloin, ribeye, topside and rump). Data were collected at two UK abattoirs using time-of-flight cameras and manual bone out methods. Predictions were made for 484 carcasses, using multiple linear regression (MLR) or machine learning (ML) techniques. Model inputs included breed type, sex, and abattoir as fixed effects, and cold carcass weight, visually assessed EUROP fat and conformation classes, and 3D measurements as covariates. Machine learning techniques were only used for models including 3D measurements. The CCW and fixed effects resulted in high accuracy (SMY R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72-0.90, RMSE = 2.12-3.96 kg, primal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.56-0.67, RMSE = 0.36-0.91 kg), and including the EUROP covariates increased accuracies (SMY R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75-0.96, RMSE = 2.00-3.11 kg, primal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.58-0.79, RMSE = 0.36-0.79 kg). The 3D measurement covariates and abattoir resulted in moderate accuracy (SMY MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.39-0.58, RMSE = 3.26-10.31 kg, primal MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.33-0.52, RMSE = 0.44-1.14 kg) and high accuracy when combined with CCW and all fixed effects (SMY MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72-0.95, RMSE = 1.81-3.42 kg, primal MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.52-0.74, RMSE = 0.40-0.81 kg). The best ML models resulted in similar accuracies to the MLR models. Models including 3D measurements produced similar accuracies to models built using conventional data recorded at the abattoir, indicting the potential for automated prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":389,"journal":{"name":"Meat Science","volume":"222 ","pages":"109738"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meat yields and primal cut weights from beef carcasses can be predicted with similar accuracies using in-abattoir 3D measurements or EUROP classification grade.\",\"authors\":\"Holly Nisbet, Nicola Lambe, Gemma A Miller, Andrea Doeschl-Wilson, David Barclay, Alexander Wheaton, Carol-Anne Duthie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Three-dimensional (3D) measurements extracted from beef carcass images were used to predict the weight of four saleable meat yield (SMY) traits (total SMY and the SMY of the forequarter, flank, and hindquarter) and four primal cuts (sirloin, ribeye, topside and rump). Data were collected at two UK abattoirs using time-of-flight cameras and manual bone out methods. Predictions were made for 484 carcasses, using multiple linear regression (MLR) or machine learning (ML) techniques. Model inputs included breed type, sex, and abattoir as fixed effects, and cold carcass weight, visually assessed EUROP fat and conformation classes, and 3D measurements as covariates. Machine learning techniques were only used for models including 3D measurements. The CCW and fixed effects resulted in high accuracy (SMY R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72-0.90, RMSE = 2.12-3.96 kg, primal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.56-0.67, RMSE = 0.36-0.91 kg), and including the EUROP covariates increased accuracies (SMY R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75-0.96, RMSE = 2.00-3.11 kg, primal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.58-0.79, RMSE = 0.36-0.79 kg). The 3D measurement covariates and abattoir resulted in moderate accuracy (SMY MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.39-0.58, RMSE = 3.26-10.31 kg, primal MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.33-0.52, RMSE = 0.44-1.14 kg) and high accuracy when combined with CCW and all fixed effects (SMY MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72-0.95, RMSE = 1.81-3.42 kg, primal MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.52-0.74, RMSE = 0.40-0.81 kg). The best ML models resulted in similar accuracies to the MLR models. Models including 3D measurements produced similar accuracies to models built using conventional data recorded at the abattoir, indicting the potential for automated prediction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meat Science\",\"volume\":\"222 \",\"pages\":\"109738\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meat Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109738\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109738","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Meat yields and primal cut weights from beef carcasses can be predicted with similar accuracies using in-abattoir 3D measurements or EUROP classification grade.
Three-dimensional (3D) measurements extracted from beef carcass images were used to predict the weight of four saleable meat yield (SMY) traits (total SMY and the SMY of the forequarter, flank, and hindquarter) and four primal cuts (sirloin, ribeye, topside and rump). Data were collected at two UK abattoirs using time-of-flight cameras and manual bone out methods. Predictions were made for 484 carcasses, using multiple linear regression (MLR) or machine learning (ML) techniques. Model inputs included breed type, sex, and abattoir as fixed effects, and cold carcass weight, visually assessed EUROP fat and conformation classes, and 3D measurements as covariates. Machine learning techniques were only used for models including 3D measurements. The CCW and fixed effects resulted in high accuracy (SMY R2 = 0.72-0.90, RMSE = 2.12-3.96 kg, primal R2 = 0.56-0.67, RMSE = 0.36-0.91 kg), and including the EUROP covariates increased accuracies (SMY R2 = 0.75-0.96, RMSE = 2.00-3.11 kg, primal R2 = 0.58-0.79, RMSE = 0.36-0.79 kg). The 3D measurement covariates and abattoir resulted in moderate accuracy (SMY MLR R2 = 0.39-0.58, RMSE = 3.26-10.31 kg, primal MLR R2 = 0.33-0.52, RMSE = 0.44-1.14 kg) and high accuracy when combined with CCW and all fixed effects (SMY MLR R2 = 0.72-0.95, RMSE = 1.81-3.42 kg, primal MLR R2 = 0.52-0.74, RMSE = 0.40-0.81 kg). The best ML models resulted in similar accuracies to the MLR models. Models including 3D measurements produced similar accuracies to models built using conventional data recorded at the abattoir, indicting the potential for automated prediction.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Meat Science is to serve as a suitable platform for the dissemination of interdisciplinary and international knowledge on all factors influencing the properties of meat. While the journal primarily focuses on the flesh of mammals, contributions related to poultry will be considered if they enhance the overall understanding of the relationship between muscle nature and meat quality post mortem. Additionally, papers on large birds (e.g., emus, ostriches) as well as wild-captured mammals and crocodiles will be welcomed.