富血小板血浆与皮质类固醇治疗足底筋膜炎:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Ankai Zuo, Chengfei Gao, Qiufeng Jia, Meirong Zhang, Ting Fu, Tieshan Li, Lin Wang
{"title":"富血小板血浆与皮质类固醇治疗足底筋膜炎:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ankai Zuo, Chengfei Gao, Qiufeng Jia, Meirong Zhang, Ting Fu, Tieshan Li, Lin Wang","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and corticosteroids (CS) in treating plantar fasciitis, focusing on pain relief, foot function, and plantar fascia thickness to identify the optimal treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A comprehensive search of medical databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, utilizing an extensive keyword strategy. Inclusion criteria encompassed prospective RCTs involving adult patients with plantar fasciitis treated with local PRP or CS injections, specifically assessing outcomes such as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and plantar fascia thickness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 24 RCTs with 1653 participants. PRP injections yielded significantly better VAS scores compared to CS injections at 3 months (P = 0.03) and 6 months (P < 0.001), with no significant differences at 1 month (P = 0.12) and 12 months (P = 0.08). AOFAS scores demonstrated that PRP was superior to CS at 3 (P = 0.05), 6 (P < 0.001), and 12 months (P < 0.001), with no significant differences at 1 month (P = 0.31). Regarding plantar fascia thickness, there were no significant differences between PRP and CS at 1-1.5 months (P = 0.18), 3 months (P = 0.64), and 6 months (P = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRP injections offer superior pain control compared to corticosteroids in the medium term (3-6 months) but not in the short term or at one year.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ankai Zuo, Chengfei Gao, Qiufeng Jia, Meirong Zhang, Ting Fu, Tieshan Li, Lin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and corticosteroids (CS) in treating plantar fasciitis, focusing on pain relief, foot function, and plantar fascia thickness to identify the optimal treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A comprehensive search of medical databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, utilizing an extensive keyword strategy. Inclusion criteria encompassed prospective RCTs involving adult patients with plantar fasciitis treated with local PRP or CS injections, specifically assessing outcomes such as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and plantar fascia thickness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 24 RCTs with 1653 participants. PRP injections yielded significantly better VAS scores compared to CS injections at 3 months (P = 0.03) and 6 months (P < 0.001), with no significant differences at 1 month (P = 0.12) and 12 months (P = 0.08). AOFAS scores demonstrated that PRP was superior to CS at 3 (P = 0.05), 6 (P < 0.001), and 12 months (P < 0.001), with no significant differences at 1 month (P = 0.31). Regarding plantar fascia thickness, there were no significant differences between PRP and CS at 1-1.5 months (P = 0.18), 3 months (P = 0.64), and 6 months (P = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRP injections offer superior pain control compared to corticosteroids in the medium term (3-6 months) but not in the short term or at one year.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002677\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002677","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较富血小板血浆(PRP)和皮质类固醇(CS)治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效,重点关注疼痛缓解、足部功能和足底筋膜厚度,以确定最佳治疗方法。设计:根据PRISMA指南,利用广泛的关键字策略,对医学数据库进行了全面搜索。纳入标准包括前瞻性随机对照试验,涉及接受局部PRP或CS注射治疗的成年足底筋膜炎患者,具体评估结果如视觉模拟评分(VAS)、美国骨科足踝学会(AOFAS)评分和足底筋膜厚度。结果:meta分析纳入24项随机对照试验,共1653名受试者。PRP注射在3个月(P = 0.03)和6个月(P < 0.001)时的VAS评分明显高于CS注射(P = 0.08),而在1个月(P = 0.12)和12个月(P = 0.08)时无显著差异。AOFAS评分显示PRP在3个月(P = 0.05)、6个月(P < 0.001)和12个月(P < 0.001)时优于CS, 1个月时差异无统计学意义(P = 0.31)。在足底筋膜厚度方面,PRP与CS在1-1.5个月(P = 0.18)、3个月(P = 0.64)、6个月(P = 0.05)时差异无统计学意义。结论:与皮质类固醇相比,PRP注射在中期(3-6个月)提供了更好的疼痛控制,但在短期或一年内则没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: This study aims to compare the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and corticosteroids (CS) in treating plantar fasciitis, focusing on pain relief, foot function, and plantar fascia thickness to identify the optimal treatment approach.

Design: A comprehensive search of medical databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, utilizing an extensive keyword strategy. Inclusion criteria encompassed prospective RCTs involving adult patients with plantar fasciitis treated with local PRP or CS injections, specifically assessing outcomes such as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and plantar fascia thickness.

Results: The meta-analysis included 24 RCTs with 1653 participants. PRP injections yielded significantly better VAS scores compared to CS injections at 3 months (P = 0.03) and 6 months (P < 0.001), with no significant differences at 1 month (P = 0.12) and 12 months (P = 0.08). AOFAS scores demonstrated that PRP was superior to CS at 3 (P = 0.05), 6 (P < 0.001), and 12 months (P < 0.001), with no significant differences at 1 month (P = 0.31). Regarding plantar fascia thickness, there were no significant differences between PRP and CS at 1-1.5 months (P = 0.18), 3 months (P = 0.64), and 6 months (P = 0.05).

Conclusions: PRP injections offer superior pain control compared to corticosteroids in the medium term (3-6 months) but not in the short term or at one year.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信