与中老年人精神、认知和大脑健康相关的心理概况

David Bartrés-Faz, Harriet Demnitz-King, María Cabello-Toscano, Lídia Vaqué-Alcázar, Rob Saunders, Edelweiss Touron, Gabriele Cattaneo, Julie Gonneaud, Olga Klimecki, Núria Bargalló, Javier Sánchez-Solana, José M. Tormos, Gäel Chételat, Álvaro Pascual-Leone, Natalie L. Marchant, the Medit-Ageing Research Group
{"title":"与中老年人精神、认知和大脑健康相关的心理概况","authors":"David Bartrés-Faz, Harriet Demnitz-King, María Cabello-Toscano, Lídia Vaqué-Alcázar, Rob Saunders, Edelweiss Touron, Gabriele Cattaneo, Julie Gonneaud, Olga Klimecki, Núria Bargalló, Javier Sánchez-Solana, José M. Tormos, Gäel Chételat, Álvaro Pascual-Leone, Natalie L. Marchant, the Medit-Ageing Research Group","doi":"10.1038/s44220-024-00361-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychological characteristics are associated with varying dementia risk and protective factors. To determine whether these characteristics aggregate into psychological profiles and whether these profiles differentially relate to aging health, we conducted a cross-sectional investigation in two independent middle-aged (51.4 ± 7.0 years (mean ± s.d.); N = 750) and older adult (71.1 ± 5.9 years; N = 282) cohorts, supplemented by longitudinal analyses in the former. Using a person-centered approach, three profiles emerged in both cohorts: those with low protective characteristics (profile 1), high risk characteristics (profile 2) and well-balanced characteristics (profile 3). Profile 1 showed the worst objective cognition in older age and middle age (at follow-up), and most rapid cortical thinning. Profile 2 exhibited the worst mental health symptomology and lowest sleep quality in both older age and middle age. We identified profile-dependent divergent patterns of associations that may suggest two distinct paths for mental, cognitive and brain health, emphasizing the need for comprehensive psychological assessments in dementia prevention research to identify groups for more personalized behavior-change strategies. This cross-sectional study in two independent middle-aged and aged cohorts investigates whether psychological characteristics associated with varying dementia risk aggregate into psychological profiles and relate to aging brain health.","PeriodicalId":74247,"journal":{"name":"Nature mental health","volume":"3 1","pages":"92-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-024-00361-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological profiles associated with mental, cognitive and brain health in middle-aged and older adults\",\"authors\":\"David Bartrés-Faz, Harriet Demnitz-King, María Cabello-Toscano, Lídia Vaqué-Alcázar, Rob Saunders, Edelweiss Touron, Gabriele Cattaneo, Julie Gonneaud, Olga Klimecki, Núria Bargalló, Javier Sánchez-Solana, José M. Tormos, Gäel Chételat, Álvaro Pascual-Leone, Natalie L. Marchant, the Medit-Ageing Research Group\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44220-024-00361-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Psychological characteristics are associated with varying dementia risk and protective factors. To determine whether these characteristics aggregate into psychological profiles and whether these profiles differentially relate to aging health, we conducted a cross-sectional investigation in two independent middle-aged (51.4 ± 7.0 years (mean ± s.d.); N = 750) and older adult (71.1 ± 5.9 years; N = 282) cohorts, supplemented by longitudinal analyses in the former. Using a person-centered approach, three profiles emerged in both cohorts: those with low protective characteristics (profile 1), high risk characteristics (profile 2) and well-balanced characteristics (profile 3). Profile 1 showed the worst objective cognition in older age and middle age (at follow-up), and most rapid cortical thinning. Profile 2 exhibited the worst mental health symptomology and lowest sleep quality in both older age and middle age. We identified profile-dependent divergent patterns of associations that may suggest two distinct paths for mental, cognitive and brain health, emphasizing the need for comprehensive psychological assessments in dementia prevention research to identify groups for more personalized behavior-change strategies. This cross-sectional study in two independent middle-aged and aged cohorts investigates whether psychological characteristics associated with varying dementia risk aggregate into psychological profiles and relate to aging brain health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature mental health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"92-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-024-00361-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-024-00361-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-024-00361-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理特征与不同的痴呆风险和保护因素有关。为了确定这些特征是否汇总成心理特征,以及这些特征是否与衰老健康有差异,我们对两名独立的中年人(51.4±7.0岁(mean±s.d.))进行了横断面调查;N = 750)和老年人(71.1±5.9岁;N = 282)组,并辅以纵向分析。采用以人为中心的方法,在两个队列中出现了三种特征:低保护性特征(特征1),高风险特征(特征2)和平衡良好特征(特征3)。特征1在老年和中年(随访)中表现出最差的客观认知,并且皮层变薄最快。剖面2在老年和中年均表现出最差的心理健康症状和最低的睡眠质量。我们确定了依赖于个人资料的不同关联模式,这可能暗示了精神、认知和大脑健康的两条不同途径,强调在痴呆症预防研究中需要进行全面的心理评估,以确定更个性化的行为改变策略的群体。这项在两个独立的中老年队列中进行的横断面研究调查了与不同痴呆风险相关的心理特征是否汇总为心理特征并与衰老的大脑健康相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Psychological profiles associated with mental, cognitive and brain health in middle-aged and older adults

Psychological profiles associated with mental, cognitive and brain health in middle-aged and older adults
Psychological characteristics are associated with varying dementia risk and protective factors. To determine whether these characteristics aggregate into psychological profiles and whether these profiles differentially relate to aging health, we conducted a cross-sectional investigation in two independent middle-aged (51.4 ± 7.0 years (mean ± s.d.); N = 750) and older adult (71.1 ± 5.9 years; N = 282) cohorts, supplemented by longitudinal analyses in the former. Using a person-centered approach, three profiles emerged in both cohorts: those with low protective characteristics (profile 1), high risk characteristics (profile 2) and well-balanced characteristics (profile 3). Profile 1 showed the worst objective cognition in older age and middle age (at follow-up), and most rapid cortical thinning. Profile 2 exhibited the worst mental health symptomology and lowest sleep quality in both older age and middle age. We identified profile-dependent divergent patterns of associations that may suggest two distinct paths for mental, cognitive and brain health, emphasizing the need for comprehensive psychological assessments in dementia prevention research to identify groups for more personalized behavior-change strategies. This cross-sectional study in two independent middle-aged and aged cohorts investigates whether psychological characteristics associated with varying dementia risk aggregate into psychological profiles and relate to aging brain health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信