{"title":"用近场地震记录估计2019年台湾秀林ML 6.3地震的破裂方向","authors":"Ruey-Der Hwang, Chiung-Yao Lin, Cai-Yi Lin","doi":"10.1007/s10950-024-10251-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We deconvolved regional seismograms to derive the azimuth-dependent source time functions for the 2019 Xiulin (Taiwan) earthquake. Subsequently, using rupture directivity and multiple-event analyses, we investigated the earthquake’s rupture features. The rupture directivity analysis revealed a rupture length of 11.5 km, a source duration of 7.37 s, and a rupture velocity (Vr) of 1.56 km/s, approximately 0.4 times the crustal S-wave velocity. The multiple-event analysis indicated two sub-ruptures during the earthquake. Notably, the average rupture and the sub-rupture shared the same product of Δσ<sub>S</sub>Vr<sup>3</sup> (Δσ<sub>S</sub>: static stress drop), adhering to a specific source-scaling relationship. In summary, the 2019 Xiulin earthquake exhibited a relatively low Vr and a relatively high Δσ<sub>S</sub>. Additionally, we observed similarities between the 2018 Hualien and 2019 Xiulin earthquakes by comparing their fault parameters. The rupture directivity analysis revealed that both earthquakes occurred on the same westward-dipping plane, suggesting that the 2019 Xiulin earthquake represented the residual stress release from the 2018 Hualien earthquake. Compared with the Hualien earthquake, the Xiulin earthquake dissipated more energy per unit area to rupture the fault.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Seismology","volume":"28 6","pages":"1565 - 1576"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rupture directivity of the 2019 ML 6.3 Xiulin (Taiwan) earthquake estimated by near-field seismograms\",\"authors\":\"Ruey-Der Hwang, Chiung-Yao Lin, Cai-Yi Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10950-024-10251-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We deconvolved regional seismograms to derive the azimuth-dependent source time functions for the 2019 Xiulin (Taiwan) earthquake. Subsequently, using rupture directivity and multiple-event analyses, we investigated the earthquake’s rupture features. The rupture directivity analysis revealed a rupture length of 11.5 km, a source duration of 7.37 s, and a rupture velocity (Vr) of 1.56 km/s, approximately 0.4 times the crustal S-wave velocity. The multiple-event analysis indicated two sub-ruptures during the earthquake. Notably, the average rupture and the sub-rupture shared the same product of Δσ<sub>S</sub>Vr<sup>3</sup> (Δσ<sub>S</sub>: static stress drop), adhering to a specific source-scaling relationship. In summary, the 2019 Xiulin earthquake exhibited a relatively low Vr and a relatively high Δσ<sub>S</sub>. Additionally, we observed similarities between the 2018 Hualien and 2019 Xiulin earthquakes by comparing their fault parameters. The rupture directivity analysis revealed that both earthquakes occurred on the same westward-dipping plane, suggesting that the 2019 Xiulin earthquake represented the residual stress release from the 2018 Hualien earthquake. Compared with the Hualien earthquake, the Xiulin earthquake dissipated more energy per unit area to rupture the fault.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Seismology\",\"volume\":\"28 6\",\"pages\":\"1565 - 1576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Seismology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10950-024-10251-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Seismology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10950-024-10251-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rupture directivity of the 2019 ML 6.3 Xiulin (Taiwan) earthquake estimated by near-field seismograms
We deconvolved regional seismograms to derive the azimuth-dependent source time functions for the 2019 Xiulin (Taiwan) earthquake. Subsequently, using rupture directivity and multiple-event analyses, we investigated the earthquake’s rupture features. The rupture directivity analysis revealed a rupture length of 11.5 km, a source duration of 7.37 s, and a rupture velocity (Vr) of 1.56 km/s, approximately 0.4 times the crustal S-wave velocity. The multiple-event analysis indicated two sub-ruptures during the earthquake. Notably, the average rupture and the sub-rupture shared the same product of ΔσSVr3 (ΔσS: static stress drop), adhering to a specific source-scaling relationship. In summary, the 2019 Xiulin earthquake exhibited a relatively low Vr and a relatively high ΔσS. Additionally, we observed similarities between the 2018 Hualien and 2019 Xiulin earthquakes by comparing their fault parameters. The rupture directivity analysis revealed that both earthquakes occurred on the same westward-dipping plane, suggesting that the 2019 Xiulin earthquake represented the residual stress release from the 2018 Hualien earthquake. Compared with the Hualien earthquake, the Xiulin earthquake dissipated more energy per unit area to rupture the fault.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Seismology is an international journal specialising in all observational and theoretical aspects related to earthquake occurrence.
Research topics may cover: seismotectonics, seismicity, historical seismicity, seismic source physics, strong ground motion studies, seismic hazard or risk, engineering seismology, physics of fault systems, triggered and induced seismicity, mining seismology, volcano seismology, earthquake prediction, structural investigations ranging from local to regional and global studies with a particular focus on passive experiments.